#Clintonbodycount Bill Clinton broke the story Christopher sign CORRUPTION Death Death Threats Email case government is slavery Headline News Hillary Clinton Intelwars James Comey journalist liars Loretta Lynch Murder no masters no slaves Obama administration Phoenix tarmac political parasites Scandal Suicide wake up

Reporter Who Broke Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Story And Received ‘Significant’ Death Threats Found Dead

This article was originally published by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge. 

The body of a Birmingham, Alabama journalist who broke the story about the controversial 2016 tarmac meeting in Phoenix between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch was found on Saturday morning of an ‘apparent suicide,’ according to

45-year-old Christopher Sign – a news anchor at ABC 33/40 in Birmingham, was discovered at around 8 a.m. by Hoover police and fire personnel, according to the report.

“Our deepest sympathy is shared with Christopher’s loving family and close friends. We have lost a revered colleague whose indelible imprint will serve forever as a hallmark of decency, honesty, and journalist integrity. We can only hope to carry on his legacy. May his memory be for blessing,” said ABC 33/40 Vice President and General Manager Eric Land in a statement.

The tarmac bombshell, which gave the appearance that Bill Clinton was privately pleading his wife’s email case after then-FBI James Comey launched a new investigation, is thought to have contributed to Hillary Clinton’s loss in 2016.

Sign, meanwhile, had complained last year of receiving ‘significant’ death threats, having his credit cards hacked, and creating code-words to use with his children.

Sign, an Emmy-award-winning reporter, made national headlines over the June 27, 2016 tarmac meeting at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport amid the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized server. The meeting between Clinton and Lynch occurred days before Comey announced that the bureau would not press charges against Hillary – after the agency changed internal language describing Clinton’s conduct from “gross negligence” to “extremely careless.”

“Gross negligence” is a legal term of art in criminal law often associated with recklessness. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, gross negligence is A severe degree of negligence taken as reckless disregard,” and “Blatant indifference to one’s legal duty, other’s safety, or their rights. “Extremely careless,” on the other hand, is not a legal term of art.

In addition to the “gross negligence” –> “extremely careless” edit (performed by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok), the FBI removed a key justification for elevating Clinton’s actions to the standard of “gross negligence” – that being the “sheer volume” of classified material on Clinton’s server. In the original draft, the “sheer volume” of material “supports an inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information.”

Also removed from Comey’s statement were all references to the Intelligence Community’s involvement in investigating Clinton’s private email server, as well as changing the language to downgrade the probability that Clinton’s server was hacked by hostile actors, changing their language from “reasonably likely” to “possible” – an edit which eliminated yet another justification for the phrase “Gross negligence.” To put it another way, “reasonably likely” means the probability of a hack due to Clinton’s negligence is above 50 percent, whereas the hack simply being “possible” is any probability above zero.

In short, Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting appears to have had quite the effect on his wife’s investigation, despite the fact that she still lost. And now the guy who broke the story is dead.

The post Reporter Who Broke Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Story And Received ‘Significant’ Death Threats Found Dead first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Afghanistan Afghanistan withdrawal Forever wars Hillary Clinton Intelwars Islamic terrorism Joe Biden Taliban US Military

Hillary Clinton: Islamic terrorism and ‘huge refugee outflow’ could be consequences of Biden leaving Afghanistan

Former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic nominee for president Hillary Clinton raised concerns over President Joe Biden’s withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, warning of “two huge consequences” of leaving the war-torn region in an interview Sunday.

The first consequence is “the potential collapse of the Afghan government and a takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban,” Clinton said.

She warned that civil war might resume in the country if American troops leave, a concern shared by U.S. commanders in the region who opposed the withdrawal over fears the Taliban could overrun Afghan armed forces without American military support.

Clinton added that the United States has an obligation to protect “many thousands of Afghans” who worked with the U.S. and NATO, those who “stood up and spoke out for women’s rights and human rights.”

“I hope that the administration in concert with the Congress will have a very large visa program and will begin immediately to try to provide that channel for so many Afghans to utilize so that they are not left in danger,” she said, predicting a “huge refugee outflow” if Afghanistan spirals into civil war.

The second major consequence of U.S. withdrawal, according to Clinton, is the “resumption of activities by global terrorist groups, most particularly Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.”

Acknowledging that there has been a “sharp drop in both capacity and action on behalf of Islamic terrorist groups,” Clinton said she wouldn’t count on that “downward spiral” lasting if the Taliban retakes power and provides refuge for Islamic terrorist groups.

“The Taliban has never been willing to separate itself from Al-Qaeda,” Clinton pointed out.

“It’s one thing to pull out troops that have been supporting security in Afghanistan, supporting the Afghan military, leaving it pretty much to fend for itself, but we can’t afford to walk away from the consequences of that decision,” Clinton concluded.

The United States officially began to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan last week, with President Joe Biden’s ultimate goal being a complete exit from the country by Sept. 11 — commemorating the 20-year-anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City.

Biden’s timetable for withdrawal broke an agreement between the Trump administration and the Taliban to have American military forces leave Afghanistan by May 1. In response, the Taliban said Friday it will “take every counteraction it deems appropriate against the occupying forces,” possibly signaling new attacks on U.S. forces as they attempt to leave the country.

Big Government CNN COVID Pandemic COVID-19 Fareed Zakaria Hillary Clinton Intelwars Joe Biden

Hillary Clinton ‘thrilled’ Joe Biden is using the COVID pandemic to push big-government agenda

Hillary Clinton celebrated on Sunday President Joe Biden’s aggressive push to enact a progressive, big-government agenda, commending Biden for using the COVID-19 pandemic as the means to expand government in Americans’ lives.

What is the background?

Despite having been president for just three months, Biden has already proposed $6 trillion worth of legislation.

First it was a $1.9 trillion pandemic-related economic recovery bill — that, of course, was filled with countless spending items unrelated to the pandemic — then it was a $2.3 trillion infrastructure and jobs plan that had very little to do with improving highways and bridges. Finally, Biden unveiled a $1.8 trillion plan that “seeks to expand access to education, reduce the cost of child care and support women in the work force,” the New York Times reported.

Biden has also proposed a massive immigration reform bill that would provide a pathway to citizenship to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.

What did Clinton say?

Clinton told CNN host Fareed Zakaria that she is “thrilled” Biden is exploiting the vulnerability of Americans caused by the pandemic “to try to push the agenda as far as possible.”

In fact, Clinton packaged government action as something that Americans — including Republicans and independents — view positively, citing Biden’s job approval.

“It wasn’t until the pandemic that I think a truly working majority of Americans … suddenly understood in a clear way that, you know what, there’s lots of times when we need the government, and we’ve been exposed as lacking in the kind of investments and support that we, as Americans, should be providing each other with the government as our partner,” Clinton opined.

“I’m thrilled that, you know, President Biden is taking advantage of this moment to try to push the agenda as far as possible,” she added.

However, polling data indicates that Biden is deeply unpopular with Republicans and extremely popular with Democrats and that only a slight majority of independents approve of Biden’s job.

Clinton went on to say that Biden is building on the work of previous Democratic presidents — and, of course, she took a shot at former President Donald Trump, although not by name.

“I think both, you know, Presidents Obama and Clinton did, too,” she said of having a big government agenda, “but they were more constrained given what the climate was politically during their administrations.”

“I think it builds on a lot of what did happen in prior Democratic administrations. But it also goes further. And it can go further because people understand, guess what, you know, we kind of were failed by our government for four years when we confronted one of the worst health care crises, economic crises that our country has seen,” Clinton added.

Overall, Clinton graded Biden’s first 100 days as president with an A.

“We now have a mature, experienced president, and thank goodness we do,” Clinton said.

Constitution Hillary Clinton IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Marco Rubio Trump Impeachment

Marco Rubio questions whether Trump impeachment sets ‘new precedent’ that could target Hillary Clinton

Could the Democratic Party’s pursuit of another Trump impeachment have consequences for one of their own? That is exactly what Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) suggested could happen.

What happened?

During former President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial on Friday, Rubio asked whether retroactively using the Constitution’s impeachment mechanisms against Trump would create a ripple effect allowing other former government officials to be impeached and face a Senate trial.

In his question, Rubio asked about a “former secretary of state,” a clear reference to Hillary Clinton.

Rubio asked, according to Mediate:

Voting to convict the former president would create a new precedent that a former official can be convicted and disqualified by the Senate. Therefore, is it not true that under this new precedent a future House facing partisan pressure to “lock her up” could impeach a former Secretary of State and a future Senate be forced to put her on trial and potentially disqualify from any future office?

In response, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the lead House Impeachment Manager, claimed the “jurisdictional issue is over.”

Raskin added that Rubio’s hypothetical question “has no bearing on this case because I don’t think you’re talking about an official who was impeached while they were in office for conduct that they committed while they were in office.”

What did Trump’s lawyer say?

Michael van der Veen, one of former President Donald Trump’s defense attorneys, disagreed.

He told Rubio that Democrats are setting a precedent that could not only be applied to the “former secretary of state,” but “to a lot of people and that’s not the way this is supposed to work and not only could it happen to a lot of people, it would become much more regular, too.”

Van der Veen added that Rubio’s question highlights the “absolutely slippery slope” of Democrats decision to pursue an impeachment trial despite Trump no longer being president.

“The original question is an absolutely slippery slope that I don’t really think anybody here wants to send this country down,” van deer Veen said.

Anything else?

Trump’s trial will most likely end on Saturday with his acquittal.

Earlier in the day, the Senate voted to call witnesses, which would have extended the trial indefinitely. However, the Senate quickly reached an agreement that included not calling witnesses.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also announced that he would vote to acquit Trump.

“While a close call, I am persuaded that impeachments are a tool primarily of removal and we therefore lack jurisdiction,” McConnell said in a letter to Senate Republicans.

abolish slavery Bill Clinton Compliance democracy is mob rule Donald Trump Dr. anthony fauci godvernment Government government is slavery Headline News Hillary Clinton Intelwars Joe Biden Masters Michael Cohen New World Order One World Religion power system voting doesn't matter wake up we live in a psyop worship government

Cult: Government Is Now The New Religion?

A new magazine cover of the Jacobin is striking a nerve after it appears that the magazine is saying the government is now god and our religion, to be worshipped. It sure begs the age-old question: who do you serve?

If we are ever to be free, we have to remove our consent. That goes for those who worshipped Trump as the messiah as well (and there were plenty.)  We should have never allowed ourselves to see each other as slaves to the ruling class, submitting to democracy (which is mob rule) and letting others have power over anyone else for any reason. Our inability to take the moral high ground has led to us this point in history. Government is now your god. Like it or not.

Describing Trump supporters as a cult has become a trope among his Democratic critics. Which seems ironic, considering how the very same crowd in the past four years tended to invest emotionally in whoever they hoped would end Trump’s presidency. Special Counsel Robert Muller probably received the lion’s share of the prayers, though figures like ex-FBI director James Comey or even Trump’s fixer-turned-critic Michael Cohen basked in some limelight. –RT

Here’s the cover of the magazine in its entirety for you to have a look at:

Biden’s larger-than-life, bare-chested figure is shown surrounded by ‘holy spirits’ of Twitter and ‘saints’. The latter include kneeling Democrat leaders in the US Congress, Dr. Anthony Fauci, fawning journalists, and manager-class devotees eagerly consuming the ‘holy scripture’ from what is probably the latest Barack Obama memoir. The former president himself is shown as a six-winged seraphim bracketed by the likewise angelic Hillary and Bill Clinton, with the trio gazing benignly from the heavens. A crowd of mask-wearing suburban laymen on Earth celebrates Biden’s ascension. A pair of Reaper drones complete the picture, providing a clear hint for the doubtful that the image should be taken with a grain of salt.-RT

It is way past time to figure out that this is the plan.  One world government, worshipped under the one world religion where the very few control and enslave the many.  Trump obviously didn’t do anything he promised, such as drain the swamp, and people are still worshipping him as some sort of messiah as well.  Stop allowing others to rule over you and making exceptions if one has a different letter behind his name.

Democracy is mob rule. If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let us do it. Government is slavery. Taxation is theft. Time to wake up and take the moral approach that no one should be a master and no one should be a slave regardless of whether it’s called “government” or not.

Manipulating The Masses: Edward Bernays & Why The System Needs Your Compliance

Hopefully, this is the wake-up call people need and the push toward a liberated humanity, truly free from their chains.

The post Cult: Government Is Now The New Religion? first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Capitol conspiracy Capitol riots Hillary Clinton Intelwars Pelosi Trump putin

Clinton, Pelosi float conspiracy theory that Trump and Putin worked together to plan the Capitol riot

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi are floating an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that President Trump worked with Russian President Vladimir Putin to coordinate the riot at the U.S. Capitol and are calling for commission to unearth the facts.

What are the details?

During a bonus episode of Clinton’s podcast, “You and Me Both,” released Monday, the two discussed the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol and took turns theorizing Putin’s potential role in the event.

“I hope historically we will find out who he’s beholden to, who pulls his strings,” Clinton said, first raising the notion. “I would love to see his phone records to see whether he was talking to Putin the day that the insurgents invaded our Capitol.”

“But we now know that not just him, but his enablers, his accomplices, his cult members, have the same disregard for democracy,” Clinton continued before asking Pelosi: “Do you think we need a 9/11-type commission to investigate and report everything that they can pull together and explain what happened?”

Pelosi responded: “I do. To your point of who is he beholden to, as I’ve said over and over, as I said to him in that picture with my blue suit as I was leaving, what I was saying to him as I was pointing, rudely, at him: ‘With you, Mr. President, all roads lead to Putin.”

“I don’t know what Putin has on him politically, financially, or personally, but what happened last week was a gift to Putin, because Putin wants to undermine democracy in our country and throughout the world. And these people, unbeknownst to them, maybe, are Putin puppets. They were doing Putin’s business when they did that at the incitement of an insurrection by the president of the United States,” Pelosi added.

The speaker then once again agreed that a 9/11-type commission should be launched regarding the incident and noted there is “strong support” in Congress for such a measure.

Anything else?

The wild theory, despite having no factual basis at present, is not exactly surprising coming from the two Democratic political figures.

Since the dawn of Trump’s political ascendancy, he has been dogged by Democratic claims that he was in cahoots with the Russians to undermine the United States. Such accusations culminated during Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Russian influence during the 2016 election.

Mueller’s investigation, however, to the ire of Democrats, concluded that there was no evidence that Trump or members of his team “conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.” Evidently, Clinton and Pelosi are still not convinced.

Strangely enough, it was reported last year that in July 2016, U.S. intelligence officials had become aware of claims that Clinton had approved a smear campaign against Trump, attempting to tie him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.

(H/T: The Daily Wire)

Georgia runoff election Hillary Clinton Intelwars Mitch McConnell Senate Twitter

Hillary Clinton mocks ‘Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’ on Twitter — and pays for it bigly

In the wake of what appears to be a Democratic sweep in the Georgia runoff election — which would give Democrats control of the U.S. Senate — former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton couldn’t help herself and joined a massive leftist chorus on social media, which plunged verbal daggers into conservatives far and wide.

But Clinton had a special target in mind: Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Because if the Georgia leads hold, McConnell no longer will be majority leader — and Clinton reminded him of that fact on Twitter:

“Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,” the former Secretary of State mocked.

What was the reaction?

While Clinton surely has scads of Twitter fans who loved her hearty jab — it has garnered more than 270,000 likes in less than three hours — many others saw a prime opportunity to mock the former first lady right back:

  • “Hillary ‘Will Never Be President’ Clinton,” one commenter offered.
  • “Criminal tampering with evidence, lying about Benghazi, bleachbit computers, smashing cell phones, and not being worth a stolen election Hillary,” another commenter said. “Are you and your staff assisting in destroying election evidence? It would be stupid for the party not to use a pro …”
  • “Has Been Washed Up Secretary of State Hil Clinton, who had patriots and an ambassador killed,” another user noted. “What a resume.”
  • “Citizen Hillary Clinton…. don’t act like you are some leader of people or of a cause,” another user asserted. “You want what stuffs your pockets. You don’t offer anything to society in the way of goods and services and yet make millions off the backs of hard working Americans.”
  • “Donald Trump served as President. YOU will never be president. Ever,” another commenter said.
  • “It certainly doesn’t keep her from fantasizing that she’s still relevant,” another user added to the previous tweet. “Bitter old hag.”
  • “‘Twice’ Not Elected President of the United States Hillary Clinton,” another commenter quipped.
  • “Side chick Hillary Clinton,” yet another user noted.
  • “And Hillary lost; bad, bad sore loser because she has not shut her effing mouth in 4 years,” another commenter said.

No love lost

Clinton and McConnell have locked horns before. In fact, just a few months back, McConnell called Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court a “wonderful birthday present” for Clinton.

“It was a wonderful birthday present for Hillary Clinton to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court Monday night on her birthday,” McConnell said during a campaign stop in Lawrenceburg, Kentucky, the New York Post reported. “Oh, I’m sure she was so grateful, so grateful.”

It should come as no surprise that Clinton — who turned 73 years old — was not particularly in favor of the confirmation of Barrett, a deeply religious conservativ, whose presence on the high court following Trump’s nomination tipped the balance further away from liberal justices.

Hillary Clinton Hunter biden IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Joe Biden Ukraine

The Bidens, Burisma, and Hillary: More back story on ‘Kyiv/Washington gravy train’

A year after the Democratic House voted to impeach President Donald Trump, we’re finding out more about witnesses in the impeachment hearings, the Biden family, Burisma Holdings, and now even Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

My book “Abuse of Power: Inside the Three-Year Campaign to Impeach Donald Trump” explains that Burisma hired Democratic-leaning lobbying firm Blue Star Strategies, which contacted top State Department officials in February 2016 and dropped Hunter Biden’s name as a board member in attempting the make the case there is no evidence of corruption from the Ukrainian energy firm. The book details why Hunter Biden’s work for Burisma sparked State Department concerns from officials who thought it would complicate then-Vice President Joe Biden’s diplomacy in Ukraine.

Blue Star Strategies apparently kept working for its client in both the U.S. and Ukraine, according to new information released by government watchdog group Judicial Watch, which sheds some new light on the events of 2019 and the Democrats’ effort to oust Trump from office without an election.

On Sept. 3, 2016, State Department official George Kent sent an email to then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and other officials stating that then-Ukraine Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko told him Blue Star Strategies CEO Karen Tramontano offered him meeting with the Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. “He confirmed he had been pitched by Blue Star, not sought them out,” Kent’s email said.

“Blue Star CEO Tramontano’s pitch was that she could gain him access to high levels of the Clinton campaign,” the Kent email continued, adding, “and that was appealing – to meet the possible next Presidential Chief of Staff.”

Tramontano was a top White House official under former President Bill Clinton before heading Blue Star Strategies. Kent suggested Lutsenko not take the offer to be in contact with the campaign, suggesting it was unlikely he would gain such access so close to an election, according documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The subject line from Kent said, “Lutsenko now likely not to go to DC with Blue Star, other Ukr issue comments.” Kent said he talked to the prosecutor about the suspected corruption by Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, and “the media attention being paid at present to the Kyiv/Washington gravy train.”

In 2019, Democrats and media pundits claimed talking about Hunter Biden was a distraction from Trump’s impeachment. “Abuse of Power” contends that Trump’s impeachment was a distraction from the Biden family problems. This is particularly the case now that we know Hunter Biden is under federal investigation for other business deals — though probably not Burisma.

Both Kent and Yovanovitch were witnesses in the House Intelligence Committee impeachment hearings. Kent was the most forthcoming about his concerns regarding Hunter Biden’s job on the board of Burisma, getting paid $50,000 at a time the company was facing corruption allegations.

“This smoking gun email ties Hunter Biden’s Burisma’s lobbying operation to an influence-peddling operation involving the Clinton campaign during the 2016 election,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a public statement. “This further confirms the Obama-Biden-Deep State targeting of President Trump was to cover-up and distract from their own corruption.”

Yovanovitch told the House committee in her October 2019 testimony that she knew little about Burisma and that “it just wasn’t a big issue.” In October, Judicial Watch released State Department records that include a briefing checklist of a February 2019 meeting in in Kyiv between Yovanovitch and Sally Painter, co-founder and chief operating officer of Blue Star Strategies.

Last Friday marked one year since House Democrats voted almost along party lines, with four defections on at least one of the two impeachment articles. But impeachment was the culmination of what Democrats sought to do since Trump was elected in 2016. When the Russia case fell apart, Trump’s imperfect phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would suffice. As it turned out, the phone call gave Democrats an avenue for two political goals impeach Trump and (for the time being) protect the Bidens.

Donald Trump election electors electral college Faithless electors Headline News Hillary Clinton Illusion of Choice Intelwars Joe Biden mike pence Nevada political parasites selection United States

The Electoral College Will “Vote” Today And Officially Certify The (S)Election

Today is the day.  Members of the Electoral College will get together throughout the day in their respective states to cast their official ballots for president. Most states will offer live streams to watch their proceedings, as they decide whether Joe Biden or Donald Trump will sit behind the resolute desk.

These votes will take place at locations chosen by state legislatures which is typically the state’s capitol. Exceptions include Delaware – whose electors will meet in a gym, and Nevada – which will be the only state to hold its meeting virtually this year, according to the New York Times.

Electors will use paper ballots to cast their votes for president and vice president.

And while33 states require their electors to choose whoever won the state’s popular vote, 17 other states don’t “bind” their electors – who can vote for whomever they choose. If they cast a vote for another candidate than the one which won the state, they are considered ‘faithless electors.’ In 2016, two faithless electors didn’t vote for Trump, while five faithless electors didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton. The seven electors were from Hawaii, Texas and Washington State. –ZeroHedge

After the electors meet and the votes are officially counted in Congress during a joint session held in the House chamber on January 6, with Vice President Mike Pence presiding over the affair. Pence will open the certificates, organized in alphabetical order by state, and present them to four “tellers” – two from the Senate and two from the House, who count the votes. Once Joe Biden receives at least 270 votes, as is expected to be the case, Pence will announce the result. The session cannot end until the count is complete and publicly declared, at which point the election is officially decided.

Last month, Donald Trump told reporters that if Biden is elected by the Electoral College, that he would leave office. “Certainly I will, and you know that,” he said, adding “I will and, you know that,” though he also said, “It’s going to be a very hard thing to concede because we know there was massive fraud.”

California will cast all of their electoral votes for Joe Biden around 5 pm, and that could be the push Biden needs to become the president of the United States in January.

The post The Electoral College Will “Vote” Today And Officially Certify The (S)Election first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Amy coney barrett confirmation Birthday debra messing Hillary Clinton Intelwars Leftists Mitch McConnell

Mitch McConnell says Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation was ‘wonderful birthday present’ for Hillary Clinton

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell took an opportunity to poke some fun at Hillary Clinton by saying Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court on Monday was a “wonderful birthday present” for the former Democratic presidential nominee.

What are the details?

“It was a wonderful birthday present for Hillary Clinton to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court Monday night on her birthday,” McConnell (R-Ky.) said during a Wednesday campaign stop in Lawrenceburg, Kentucky, the New York Post reported. “Oh, I’m sure she was so grateful, so grateful.”

It should come as no surprise that Clinton — who turned 73 years old — was not particularly in favor of Barrett’s confirmation.

And she took some time out on her birthday to blast the move on Twitter:

“It is an insult to the American people that the GOP is ramming through a Supreme Court justice with just eight days until the end of an election in which nearly 60 million people have already voted,” she wrote.

‘I’m sorry that this tragic day in American history has landed on your birthday’

Far-left actress Debra Messing — who earlier this year tweeted a doctored image likening President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler and even called it a “dog whistle to white nationalists and Nazis” — didn’t miss that Barrett’s confirmation came on Clinton’s birthday. And she was very sorry about that:

“I’m sorry that this tragic day in American history has landed on your birthday,” she wrote. ” I, for one, am grateful for you, and all that you have given our country. Happy birthday. May this next year be one of enlightment [sic] and healing.”

But like McConnell, House Judiciary Committee Republicans couldn’t resist using Barrett’s confirmation to mock Clinton on her birthday:

Others tore into Clinton’s “insult to the American people” tweet:

  • “The fact that you walk free is an insult to America,” Errol Webber, a GOP U.S. House candidate, commented. “Happy Birthday, by the way, you demon!”
  • “You’re just pissed it’s happening on your birthday… ” another commenter said. “But the rest of us absolutely LOVE it.”

And this guy chimed in, too:

Image source: Twitter

Clinton biden Clinton born to be president Clinton sick Clinton trump Hillary Clinton Intelwars

Hillary Clinton still fuming: ‘I was born’ to be president; it makes me ‘literally sick to my stomach to think’ of another Trump win

Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is apparently still fuming over her loss to President Donald Trump in the 2016 election.

During a
recent appearance on Kara Swisher’s New York Times Opinion podcast, “Sway,” the former secretary of state alleged that she was “born” to be president and that it literally makes her “sick” to her stomach to think of another Trump win.

What did she say?

At one point during the lengthy interview, Swisher asked Clinton if she thought a woman president would handle the coronavirus pandemic more ably.

Clinton quickly responded by tooting her own horn, saying, “I have no doubt, especially if it were me.”

I was born for that. I mean, that’s why I knew I’d be a good president. I was ready for crises and emergencies, and I would have done what you see these women leaders doing. You listen to the science. You bring in people in an open, inclusive way. You communicate constantly, you make the case by explaining why what you’re doing is in the long-term interests, not only of health, but also, of the economy. Yeah, I have no doubt in my mind at all that I would have stepped up to that crisis.

Later in the interview, when the topic of Trump’s re-election chances came up, Clinton jumped in, saying, “I can’t entertain the idea of him winning.”

“It would cause cognitive dissonance of a grave degree,” she said before adding that even thinking about a potential Trump win would also make her physically ill.

It makes me literally sick to my stomach to think that we’d have four more years of this abuse and destruction of our institutions, and damaging of our norms and our values, and lessening of our leadership, and the list goes on. But there’s no doubt that he would do everything he could to attack and punish anyone who was, in his view, an adversary …

… I don’t think he has any boundaries at all, Kara. I don’t think he has any conscience. He’s obviously not a moral, truthful man. So he will do whatever he can to lift himself up. And remember, as I said, he lives with this specter of illegitimacy. He knows more about how he got really elected than we still do. Hopefully, we’ll learn more in the years ahead.

Clinton, who has since endorsed Democratic nominee Joe Biden, last year reportedly considered running for president again in 2020. Clinton has had a difficult time getting over her 2016 loss, allegedly thinking about a rematch with Trump “all the time.”

What else?

Yet despite exuding obvious bitterness about the result of the election four years ago — even alleging that it was illegitimate — Clinton wanted listeners to know that it’s Trump, not her, who remains plagued by the outcome.

“Well, I think I live rent-free in his head,” she said. “He does not live rent-free in my head, because I have very little regard for him.”

But Clinton seemed sure that, this time around, Biden would do what she couldn’t do and seal an Electoral College win over Trump. Part of the reason for that, she said, is that “most Republicans are going to want to close the page” on the Trump era.

“They have been cowards, spineless enablers of him,” she added. “They want to see him gone as much as we do, but they can’t say it publicly.”

Dana perino interview Emails released before election Hillary Clinton Hillary clinton's classified emails Hillary emails released Intelwars Mike pompeo hillary emails Mike pompeo release hillary emails

Mike Pompeo says he will release Hillary’s emails before the election after Trump criticizes him publicly

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that he would be releasing more of Hillary Clinton’s emails after the president publicly criticized him about the subject on Fox News.

Pompeo made the comments to Dana Perino of Fox News on Friday after the “Daily Briefing” host played for him criticism from the president about the lack of released documents.

“They’re in the State Department, but Mike Pompeo has been unable to get them out. Which is very sad. Actually I’m not happy about him for that reason,” said Trump in the recording.

“He was unable to get them out, and I don’t know why, you’re running the State Department, you get them out, forget about the fact that they were classified! Let’s go! Maybe Mike Pompeo finally finds them, OK?” he added.

Perino also played video from Trump criticizing Pompeo during a radio interview with Rush Limbaugh.

“She deleted 33,000 emails, she should be in jail for that,” said Trump. “I don’t even care if they’re very highly confidential emails, I don’t care what.”

“So what is the state of this investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails at the State Department?” asked Perino.

“We got the emails, we’re getting them out, we’re getting all this information out so the American people can see it” said Pompeo.

“You’ll remember there was classified information on a private server, it should have never been there. Hillary Clinton should have never have done that. It was unacceptable behavior, it’s not the kind of thing that leaders do,” he added.

“They don’t put that kind of information out and you can see, whether it’s Russia, or China, or Iran, or the North Koreans who want to get their hands on this kind of information, classified information needs to stay in the right places,” he continued. “Secretary Clinton, when she was here at the State Department, did not do that.”

Perino pointed out that the president could declassify the information himself and release it, and Pompeo agreed. He also said that the president would never release information that would put any intelligence sources in harm’s way.

When asked if that information would come out before the election, he responded, “doing it as fast as we can, I certainly, I certainly think there’ll be more to see before the election.”

Here’s the video of the exchange from Dana Perino’s show:

Pompeo calls Pelosi’s 25th Amendment bill a ‘political stunt’

declassification documents Hillary Clinton Intelwars Russia hoax trump

Breaking: Trump authorizes declassification of all documents related to ‘Russia hoax’ without redactions

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday night that he has authorized the declassification of all government documents related to claims that Hillary Clinton and her campaign sought to link him to Russian collusion ahead of the 2016 election.

What are the details?

“I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax,” the president tweeted. “Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions!”

Trump added, “All Russia Hoax Scandal information was Declassified by me long ago. Unfortunately for our Country, people have acted very slowly, especially since it is perhaps the biggest political crime in the history of our Country. Act!!!”

The president’s announcement came within hours of Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassifying a heavily redacted CIA memo addressed to former FBI director James Comey and former Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, who was part of the investigations into both the Clinton email scandal and the Trump-Russia collusion claims.

The memo informed Comey and Strzok of “an exchange…discussing U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”

Strzok was later fired by the FBI. Comey was later fired by President Trump.

Ratcliffe also released notes taken by former CIA Director John Brennan, showing that Brennan was aware of the allegations. Brennan had written in 2016, “Cite alleged approval by Hillary Clinton (on 28 July) on proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to villify (sic) Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.”

Brennan also wrote “any evidence of collaboration between Trump campaign & Russia,” in a bullet point next to where he had written “POTUS” in the margin.

Fox News reported that “a source familiar with the documents explained that Brennan’s handwritten notes were taken after briefing [President Barack] Obama on the matter.”

Last week, Ratcliffe sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, alerting him that “In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

The DNI also wrote that “The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”

But Ratcliff told Fox on Tuesday, “To be clear, this is not Russian disinformation and has not been assessed as such by the Intelligence Community. I’ll be briefing Congress on the sensitive sources and methods by which it was obtained in the coming days.”

concede Debate Donald Trump Economy Fear Gold GREED Headline News Hillary Clinton Index Intelwars interjecting Joe Biden LIES no winner political theatre propaganda Silver Stock Market


This article was contributed by James Davis with Future Money Trends.

I watched the debate and my FIRST CONCLUSION is that no one has truly WON IT decisively.

Going into it, everyone expected Trump to dominate it and to have the UPPER HAND, but ex-Vice President Joe Biden did not get RATTLED or shaken up by Trump’s strategy of meddling with Biden’s AIRTIME.

In our opinion, the tactic of constantly INTERJECTING and commenting, which worked with Hillary, didn’t achieve the SAME OUTCOME this time around. It did not buy Trump sympathy points since the moderator did not fall for the same trap the 2016 hosts did.

We believe that because of the setting and the subject matter, viewers wanted SUBSTANCE, not entertainment. We believe that Biden was able to present his side calmly and that by cutting him short, it seems to us that Trump didn’t let Biden MAKE MISTAKES and sound inaccurate like he did in previous occasions.

Trump’s advisors, if that’s where this thought process originated from, did a BAD JOB here.

To make sure I’m not confusing you, we’re definitely not Biden supporters and we remain pretty far away from politics, but we do know the outcome of these elections mean A WHOLE LOT to you, so we’re publishing what we think is important. OBJECTIVELY, we saw Trump win AS EXPECTED, but not by crushing his adversary like we initially anticipated.

This means that Trump lost an IMPORTANT MILESTONE, which means that markets might continue to wander WITHOUT DIRECTION since it’s not yet known who has the UPPER HAND.

Look how perfectly this is displayed by the FEAR/GREED index:


It’s SMACK-DAB in the middle of the column; a sign of the times.

Here are a few things to consider if you’re A TRUMP SUPPORTER:

  1. People that are of the same age group as Joe Biden OR OLDER might actually empathize with Joe and not appreciate Trump’s bullying him on account of his age alone.
  2. Because everyone came into this debate EXPECTING TRUMP to crush Biden, the fact that Biden was able to CARRY THROUGH was a pleasant surprise to UNDECIDED VOTERS who have heard that Sleepy Joe is senile and have now seen somewhat CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE.
  3. Biden’s approach was to keep the conversation civil, which is not Trump’s style and makes many reject him RIGHT OFF THE BAT. We wonder how many swing voters did not resonate with his manners.


September’s MARKET ROUT has been a catalyst for dollar strength, and that’s AWFUL for silver prices. Since Trump was elected, this has been the dollar’s SECOND-BEST month, so what is the market thinking here?

One thing to keep in mind as a GOLD BULL and a SILVER SPECULATOR is that Trump’s demeanor and his HANDS-ON approach with China have actually strengthened the dollar a lot!

The dollar has been VERY STRONG under his reign and a Biden win will LESSEN TENSIONS, which will lower the need to own so much liquid cash.

This isn’t over yet.

The presidential race is ALIVE AND WELL. Either can still win and, in our opinion, a Biden win is actually MORE INFLATIONARY.

It would be a shame, though, to see Trump concede since before Covid-19, things were looking good.

The post LET JOE SPEAK: TRUMP’S BIGGEST MISTAKE EVER! first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Congress dick durbin Donald Trump Election 2020 Hillary Clinton Intelwars us senate

Top Democrat: Hillary Clinton is ‘flat-out wrong’ for telling Biden not to concede election

The No. 2 Democratic leader in the U.S. Senate said his party’s 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is “flat-out wrong” for hypocritically encouraging 2020 nominee Vice President Joe Biden to refuse to concede the election against President Donald Trump.

“I disagree with Hillary Clinton,” Democratic Minority Whip Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in an interview Sunday. “I respect her, I like her, but I think she’s just flat-out wrong.”

In 2016 Clinton blasted Trump as a “threat to our democracy” after he would not commit to accepting the results of the election. In August 2020, Clinton changed her tune and said Biden should not “concede” the 2020 election “under any circumstances.”

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is,” Clinton said in an interview. She claimed Republicans are “looking toward … messing up absentee balloting” to steal the election.

“We’ve got to have a massive legal operation — I know the Biden campaign is working on that,” she said.

Clinton and other Democrats have repeatedly accused Republicans and President Donald Trump of sowing doubt about the integrity of the U.S. election, pointing to the president’s noncommittal comments about a peaceful transition of power. They say Trump’s frequent complaints about mail-in ballots suggest he will declare victory if he leads the vote on election night and refuse to leave office if he loses his lead after all the absentee ballots are counted. White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has dismissed these concerns and said the president will commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses “as long as it is a fair election.”

On ABC News, Durbin was asked about Republicans drawing a “moral equivalence” between Clinton’s comments on Biden and Trump’s comments about mail-in ballots.

“The election itself is going to be announced,” Mr. Durbin replied. “The winner will be announced. It will take longer with all the paper ballots that are being cast, but at some point I hope my choice Joe Biden is elected president.”

“But if we are going to maintain a democracy, peaceful transition through an election is the only way to do it,” he added. “Just look at the streets of Belarus today if you want to see the alternative. We don’t need that in America. Whoever the winner is, if it’s clear and legal, the other party should concede.”

Blame Charles Johnson Chelsea Manning Dana Rohrabacher declined Democratic National Convention dnc Donald Trump emails Headline News Hillary Clinton Integrity Intelwars Jennifer Robinson john podesta Julian Assange Pardon Russian hackers Seth Rich Source torture United States WAR CRIMES

Trump Offered Assange A Pardon In Exchange For His Source, Assange Declined

There is still some integrity in the human race.  Julian Assange was offered a pardon from President Donald Trump in exchange for giving up the source of the Democratic National Convention emails that he leaked.  Assange declined the offer refusing to throw his source under the bus.

Assange’s defense revealed the pardon deal to a court in London on Friday, where the WikiLeaks founder is currently fighting extradition to the United States. Should he lose, he will be tried for espionage offenses and could face 175 years behind bars, according to a report by RT. 

Assange has literally declined the offer to stop the brutal torture he’s enduring in London in order to protect his source. Defense lawyer Jennifer Robinson told the court that former US Rep. Dana Rohrabacher and another Trump campaign associate, Charles Johnson, offered a pardon if Assange were to reveal the source of the emails, which are widely considered to have helped Trump win the 2016 presidential election.

“Rohrabacher proposed a ‘win-win’ situation,” Robinson said.

“Assange can get ‘get on with his life’ – a pardon in exchange for information about the source.”

“Information from Mr Assange about the source of the DNC leaks would be of value to Mr. Trump,” she added, paraphrasing Rohrabacher and Johnson. –RT. 

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

The source of the Democratic National Committee emails remains a mystery, however, there is an abundance of evidence to suggest it was Seth Rich who was mysteriously murdered.  Opponents of both Assange and Trump have pinned the blame on “Russian hackers”, yet Assange himself has gone on record as saying that Russia was not the source.

The espionage charges against Assange stem from WikiLeaks’ publication in 2010 of a tranche of documents revealing U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. The documents were leaked by former soldier Chelsea Manning, who was imprisoned from 2010 until her sentence was commuted in 2017.

A New Kind of Tyranny: The Global State’s War on Those Who Speak Truth to Power


The post Trump Offered Assange A Pardon In Exchange For His Source, Assange Declined first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Bill Clinton Blazetv Hillary Clinton Intelwars Pat gray Pat gray unleashed

VIDEO: Hillary refuses to let go of Russia Russia Russia and Bill appears ‘thrilled’ over it

Tuesday, Pat and Jeffy reviewed the video of Hillary Clinton blaming President Trump’s victory in 2016 on Russia. But the highlight of the video is Bill Clinton’s expression as he sat behind his wife and listened to her play the blame game. Watch the video for details.

Use promo code PAT to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

2020 Election April Ryan Bill Clinton Donald Trump Hillary Clinton inauguration Intelwars Joe Biden watch

Bill Clinton: Trump will ‘be stacking sandbags in front of the White House’ during Biden’s inauguration

Former President Bill Clinton said President Donald Trump will “be stacking sandbags in front the White House” while Democrat Joe Biden is being sworn in as president next January — yet another propagation of the conspiracy theory that Trump won’t give up the presidency if he loses the election.

The comment came during an Instagram Live video interview Tuesday conducted by White House correspondent April Ryan, which also included Clinton’s wife, former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Toward the end of the interview Ryan suggested that inauguration TV coverage would include a “split-screen” of Biden being sworn in and “the military going in” to pry open Trump’s “orange-knuckle” grip upon the Oval Office desk.

“I was just thinking … he probably won’t even come to Biden’s inauguration,” Bill Clinton responded. “He’ll be stacking sandbags in front of the White House.”

What else was said during the interview?

Ryan — long known for her deep dislike of Trump — amazingly referred to herself as “objective” and still found time to attack Fox News, characterize America in 2020 as “almost like a third-world country,” and accuse Trump of “stoking a race war” with “ground zero” in Portland.

“Am I wrong?” she said.

Bill Clinton replied that she’s not wrong, and Hillary Clinton said Ryan is “profoundly right” that “fear” is a major weapon Trump uses.

Bill Clinton noted Trump’s “proven ability to manipulate the psyche of the people that he is trying to scare the hell out of. This is a person who says, ‘OK, I can’t win on my own, but people will believe whatever I tell them as long as it’s bad.'”

The former president also said Trump “can’t live without somebody to badmouth,” and without that dynamic “he’d have to get up every morning and decide to go to work and figure out what to do. And that’s boring … he doesn’t know how to do it.”

Hillary Clinton jumped in to note former first lady Michelle Obama’s point during the Democratic National Convention that Trump “doesn’t know how to be president. All he knows to do is be a reality TV star, and that’s what he’s going to continue to do.”

Bill Clinton conceded that Trump “cannot help who he is” but added that Trump also sees the American people as “suckers” who will buy anything he’s selling.

“He believes he can say anything and make it work. He believes he can do anything, and no one will stop it,” he said.

‘The other side is going to cheat and sneak and try to do everything they possibly can’

The Clintons not surprisingly sounded the alarm to vote Trump out of office in November.

“The only answer is to beat this guy,” Bill Clinton said. “There is no other answer.”

Hillary Clinton added that Trump “is a clear and present danger to our freedoms, our liberties, our unity, and we’ve got to defeat him.” She also said people have to vote for Biden in overwhelming numbers as though their “lives and livelihoods depend on it.”

Still, Bill Clinton worried about the Trump camp, saying its members are “cold-blooded calculating people.”

“I believe the other side is going to cheat and sneak and try to do everything they possibly can,” Hillary Clinton added, underscoring her recent advice to Biden to not concede the election “under any circumstances.”

acquiescing agenda Australia authoritarianism Bill Clinton chaos Civil Liberties democracy is a scam division dog and pony show Donald Trump elections are selections elites Emergency Preparedness experts Forecasting freedom Globalists Government H.G. Wells Hillary Clinton independence Intelwars law scams liberty advocates mind control muzzles New World Order peace plandemic Police State political theater power never concedes puppets ruling class scamdemic Socialism Society sovereignty Strobe Talbot Thomas Jefferson tyranny United States voluntaryism

The Totalitarian Future Globalists Want For The Entire World Is Being Revealed

This article was originally published by Brandon Smith at Alt-Market.

All over the Western world ever since 9/11 there have been incremental steps towards what many liberty advocates would call a “police state”; a system in which governments are no longer restricted by the boundaries of civil liberties and are given the power to do just about anything they want in the name of public safety. The use of “the law” as a tool for injecting tyranny into a culture is the first tactic of all totalitarians.

The idea is that by simply writing government criminality into the law books, that criminality somehow becomes justified by virtue of legal recognition. It’s all very circular. Whenever government abuse of the people is initiated, it’s always initiated in the name of what’s “best for society as a whole”. To save society, the individuals that make up a society must be sublimated or destroyed. This mentality is the complete opposite of what the Founding Fathers in America fought and died for, but as Thomas Jefferson once said:

Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.”

In countries like Australia, which claim to value Western democratic principles of liberty and rule by the people, the perception is that civil rights are codified into the legal framework just as they are in the US. However, there are some glaring differences and issues; specifically, Australian citizens (like many European citizens) have absolutely no means to compel their government or the elites that influence their government to limit themselves. It is these nations, in which the populations have been mostly disarmed and pacified, that any agenda for tyranny will first be established. But we will get to that in a moment…

Make no mistake, there is a very OPEN and easily identifiable agenda on the part of globalists to establish a heavily centralized police state system in every country they are able. This is not “conspiracy theory”, this is a conspiracy fact.

For many years now there have been numerous analysts, economists, and geopolitical experts in the alternative media that have predicted and warned the public about the globalist strategy of “order out of chaos”. In other words, the ultra-wealthy power brokers that hold influence over most governments on Earth seek to “reshape” the existing social order through the creation of crisis and disaster. By engineering public desperation, they hope to lure us into accepting restrictions on our freedoms that we would have never considered otherwise.

The goal of a single global economy and government has been spoken of by elites time and time again, yet it is still to this day called “conspiracy theory” or “paranoid delusion”. I could quote these elites and their organizations all day long, but I’ll cite a few choice statements to make my point.

As former Deputy Secretary of State under Clinton and Council on Foreign Relations member Strobe Talbot wrote in an article for Time Magazine in 1992 titled ‘America Abroad: The Birth Of The Global Nation’:

In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

As elitist and Fabian Socialist HG Wells outlines in his non-fiction treatise titled ‘The New World Order’:

“…When the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”

And how about one of my favorite revealing quotes from Trilateral Commission member Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson? He wrote in the April 1974 issue of the Council on Foreign Relation’s (CFR) journal Foreign Affairs (pg. 558) in an article titled ‘The Hard Road To World Order’:

In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end-run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

Members of globalist foundations and think-tanks like the CFR have inhabited nearly every US government office and presidential cabinet for the past several decades. This includes the two dozen or so CFR members in Donald Trump’s cabinet.  Draining the swamp? Not going to happen.

As Harpers Magazine candidly revealed in a 1958 expose titled ‘School For Statesmen’:

“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common, they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”

The easiest method for the globalists to get what they openly say they want is to either conjure a crisis or exploit an existing crisis in order to “erode sovereignty”. The current pandemic fits this plan perfectly, but before sovereignty can be eliminated on a national level they need to undermine sovereignty on an individual level first.

Actions within the US and nations allied to the US suggest an accelerated attack on personal liberties is at hand.

There are sister foundations to the CFR in many other countries. For example, in Australia they have the highly embedded and influential Strategic Policy Institute, which has been consistently advocating for complete centralization of government power in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Their stated plan is to concentrate policy administration in the hands of a new “commission” or “department” made up of the “brightest minds”. This commission would not be tasked with getting Australia back to normal, but convincing the public to ACCEPT the “new normal” beyond the pandemic.

The ASPI enthusiastically heralds the idea in an article titled ‘Coronavirus Response A Chance To Reimagine Future For Australia’:

The agenda of such a department now is not about getting Australia back to normal after the pandemic. It’s about re-imagining what Australia can be and how we can thrive and prosper in our future beyond the coronavirus and in light of the drought, bushfires, and climate change. Think about the kind of new economy we can have after the forced, rapid adoption of dispersed home working and schooling through digital means. We can be the leading digital economy the prime minister desired before the pandemic, not by 2030 but much earlier.”

This reminds me immediately of the post 9/11 push to rapidly remove constitutional protections while the public was blinded by fear and confusion.  As US globalist Rahm Emanuel would say:

You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”

The ASPI reveals the true agenda, which is the complete federalization and unilateral implementation of law without public approval. The plan is to do this by exploiting the pandemic event to its full potential and then applying the rapid societal changes in government structure. This will then be carried on long after the coronavirus disappears in the name of the economy, welfare programs, and so-called “global warming”. The pandemic response is just a means to an end, and the end game is the total dominance of the population.

I focus on Australia and the surrounding regions in particular because this seems to be the place where globalists are enforcing technocratic policies first. Or at the very least, they are test-running their strategy and using Australians as guinea pigs. When the ASPI says they plan to keep the pandemic changes in place well after the virus is gone, they aren’t just talking about shifting into a digital economy.

Right now, Australia and New Zealand are slamming citizens with perhaps the most draconian measures yet in the Western world. These are policies that the elites want to introduce everywhere, but they are going full bore in Australia, and it just keeps getting worse.

In various areas of Australia, “Level 4” response measures have been enforced for at least the next six weeks, including curfews, strict mask policies including people being forced to wear masks OUTSIDE (contrary to everything science and virology has to say about the low possibility of transmission in sunlight and open-air), residents are not allowed to travel more than 3 miles from their homes and only one person from a household is allowed to leave at any given time. Citizens violating these rules are subject to $10,000 fines or arrest. And yes, people are being arrested simply for not wearing a mask or being too far from home.

In New Zealand, the situation has become exceedingly grim and I think it should be treated as a warning to Americans specifically as to our potential future if we allow the narrative of “public health security” to be turned into a vehicle for tyranny.

While Australia has been using quarantine facilities to force people considered high risk to isolate, NZ quarantine camps are now fully under the control of the military, and ALL citizens that test positive or are suspected to have COVID can be separated from their families and placed in the camps, which are hotels converted into prisons.

It is the complete erasure of personal liberties all because of an increase in cases which has amounted to a mere 525 deaths in Australia and 22 deaths in New Zealand.

I believe the reason Australia and New Zealand have been targeted with this level of restrictions first is because they have been almost fully disarmed and have no means to defend themselves from government overstep. That said, I see signs that similar measures will be attempted in the US as well. In states like New York, there are low key programs to set up COVID checkpoints stopping and checking vehicles coming into the state. This is where heavier restrictions start.

First, checkpoints will be established in the name of keeping infected people out of a state or city. Then, those same checkpoints will be used to keep people from leaving a state or city. Then, checkpoints will be set up at random to test people for fever or symptoms of illness. If allowed to continue, the natural progression of checkpoints is to terrify the population into not traveling anywhere for any reason. Like in Australia and NZ, people will effectively be imprisoned in their homes. At this stage, bringing in laws or executive orders punishing people for leaving home will be easier; they will have already acclimated to being trapped at home anyway.

Furthermore, elites and globalists within the US are calling for hard lockdowns for at least six weeks, just like the Level 4 lockdowns in Australia. Federal Reserve member Neel Kashkari recently asserted that Americans are saving more, thus they should be subjected to hard lockdowns “because they can afford it”.

Virginia is planning mandatory COVID vaccinations, even though vaccines for SARS-like viruses have proven impossible to develop in the past, and rushed vaccines have a history of harming or killing people rather than protecting them. Set aside the issue that giving the government the power to force citizens to inject anything into their bodies is immoral.

What’s next? COVID camps? Well, yes, unless Americans make a hardstand. Mainstream media outlets have been suggesting this strategy for months. The Washington Post applauded the use of forced isolation camps in other nations and asks why the US has not yet used them beyond ports for foreign travelers? The reason is this: Many Americans will not go along with such measures, and will use force in-kind against anyone trying to lock them up because of a virus that is a moderate threat at most to a small percentage of the population.

That said, don’t assume that the establishment will not eventually try it here. They will. Be ready when they do so. Look to the actions in places like Australia and NZ and ask yourself, am I willing to go along with that? And if so, for how long? Because the globalists intend for these restrictions to become the “new normal”. They intend for this nightmare to last forever.

The post The Totalitarian Future Globalists Want For The Entire World Is Being Revealed first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Actors Donald Trump Election 2016 Federal Reserve Forecasting Headline News Hillary Clinton Intelwars left-right paradigm playing a role rigged system Triggered

Why The Federal Reserve Chose Trump Over Hillary In 2016

Admittedly, this was difficult for me and many others to come to terms with. But we don’t choose the president, they are selected by the Federal Reserve, and there are reasons why Donald Trump was chosen over Hillary in 2016, and one that should be obvious by now.

It does us no good to reject truth just because we don’t like it. Politicians are puppets to the central banks. The system is rigged, and there’s no way the Federal Reserve would have “allowed” Trump to win if they didn’t already know they could control him. Like it or not, he’s destroyed the dollar, which ironically, is the goal of the Federal Reserve since it was created over a century ago. Their goal is economic destruction so they can usher in a fully centralized slave system of an unbacked digital dollar.

But that’s just one reason the Fed made sure Trump won. He wouldn’t have gotten the nomination if he wasn’t going to play into the hands of the Federal Reserve. Hillary would have done this as well, and maybe more effectively. But the real reason Trump won will likely trigger a lot of people:

Trump won to pacify those getting upset with Barack Obama. This neutered any resistance to the Fed’s plans by making people believe that Trump was going to be their savior. Not many so-called Patriots are fighting the tyranny right now because they are waiting for the all mighty Trump to save them.

Again, facts are facts even if you dislike them. And the fact is, this country is far more tyrannical under Trump than it ever was under Obama. Does that mean I support Obama? Nope. Does that mean I think Biden is better than Trump? Nope. Don’t put words in my mouth or make assumptions. It means the system is rigged and I am no longer participating in it as a pawn in the elitists’ games.

A great video putting most of this together was done by Richie From Boston. If you get triggered by facts about the left/right paradigm easily, don’t watch this video. (It starts at 2:05 after Richie explains his giveaway.) If you want to know the truth, here it is:

The evidence is there if you are willing to see it. Those still asleep may not wake up in time, however. Things are going to get ugly over this election, it’s already been promised to us by the elites.

They have made sure that byTrump’s election in 2016, there’s no resistance to their plans because Trump is the one instituting the totalitarianism. Everyone who used to voice that they wanted real true freedom has silenced themselves since Trump’s election. That’s not a coincidence and not an accident.

“In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” It’s extremely difficult to wake up and realize you have been lied to and manipulated for your entire life. But it’s imperative if you ever expect to experience freedom.

The post Why The Federal Reserve Chose Trump Over Hillary In 2016 first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Campaign 2020 Election integrity Hillary Clinton Intelwars Joe Biden

Hillary Clinton gives hypocritical advice to Biden: Do not ‘concede under any circumstances’

Democrats have routinely accused President Donald Trump and Republicans of sowing distrust in the upcoming election, especially with conspiracy theories about the U.S. Post Office. They even allege that Trump may not peacefully leave office if defeated in November.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.), the third-highest ranking Democrat in the House, said earlier in the month, “I don’t think he plans to leave the White House. He doesn’t plan to have fair and unfettered elections.”

In fact, during the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton claimed Trump was a “threat to our democracy” after he did not commit to accept the election results during a debate.

“To say you won’t respect the results of the election, that is a direct threat to our democracy. The peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America America,” said Clinton.

Now, Clinton is giving Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden ironic advice.

What is Clinton saying now?

Clinton is now urging Biden not to “concede” the 2020 election “under any circumstances.”

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is,” Clinton said.

Clinton was speaking with Jennifer Palmieri, one of her former top aides, for Showtime’s “The Circus.”

During the interview, Clinton alleged Republicans would manipulate election results in crucial swing states by targeting the legitimacy of absentee ballots.

“I think [Republicans] have a couple of scenarios that they are looking toward. One is messing up absentee balloting. They believe that helps them so that they then get maybe a narrow advantage in the Electoral College on Election Day,” Clinton claimed.

“So we’ve got to have a massive legal operation, and I know the Biden campaign is working on that,” Clinton added.

What is the background?

With concern brewing over safely conducting a national election in the midst of the coronavirus panic, mail-in ballots and the USPS have taken center stage in the national dialogue.

Trump and Republicans generally oppose mail-in ballots, arguing they increase the likelihood that voter fraud could impact election results. Democrats, however, are pushing hard for mail-in ballots because they could increase voter “turnout.”

Many primary elections have already tested the merits of mail-in ballots with sobering results

For example, Clark County, Nevada — in which Las Vegas sits — mailed 1.326 million ballots for the Nevada primary in June. Nearly one-quarter million of those ballots were returned “undeliverable,” the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported.

Meanwhile, a New Jersey judge ordered a new election in Paterson City last week after multiple elected officials were charged with voter fraud. They were caught when the U.S. Postal Inspection Service notified the New Jersey attorney general’s office that hundreds of ballots were discovered in a single mailbox.

concede Conspiracy Fact and Theory Donald Trump election experts Federal Reserve Forecasting Government Headline News Hillary Clinton illusion Intelwars Joe Biden left-right paradigm LIES massive civil unrest mental battle predictive programming selection system is rigged voting is a facade voting is an illusion

They Are Promising This Election WILL Be UGLY: Clinton Urges Biden to NOT Concede

Hillary Clinton has urged democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden to “not concede” the election “under any circumstance.” We also already heard that the elitists have done “election modeling” to find the most disturbing outcome that will ignite massive civil unrest.

Add that to the fact that Trump has alluded to the fact that he won’t concede either. It’s all a setup. It’s all theater, and we are being played. Do not fall for it. We DO NOT choose the president. The Federal Reserve will select the person who will best push their agenda, and it’s critical at this point in time that you understand this. Voting is a facade.  It will give people the illusion that they have a say win who rules over them.

The Shadow Government Blackmails Everyone (Why Voting Doesn’t Matter)

In a clip released just as the Republican National Convention was about to kick off on Monday evening, Clinton argued that if Trump emerges victorious in the November presidential contest but with a small margin, Biden should refuse to acknowledge his victory, according to RT.

Brace For The Worst Election In U.S. History

It isn’t just this little tidbit from Hillary we need to pay attention too. There have been many other clues that the elitists will use this election to manufacture violent social unrest and have already decided who is oin to win, and how in November. Participating in the delusion that you have a choice is giving the elites power, and it’s time we all realize the if votin made any difference, it would be illeal.

We have also been attempting to warn the public that this election is going to be one that will play us like fiddles. And yet, Americans, rather than stand up for real rights, liberty, and justice, will go vote in November, in an election that’s already been decided to they feel like they did their duty that the ruling class told them they had to fulfill.  They have already modeled this election, months before it will happen, just like they did with Event 201 for the coronavirus scamdemic.

The former VP must brace himself for a dragged-out legal battle in which, Clinton believes, he would prevail in the end.

Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances, because I think this is going to drag out and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is. -Hillary Clinton

Trump also refused to say whether or not he’d accept the election results as well. The election modeling has shown that the “worst case scenario” for massive civil unrest would be Biden losing the electoral collee but winning the popular vote; the same manner in which Hillary Clinton lost.

They are not hiding their plans anymore, only preparing you for what’s to come. This is a battle for your mind, and most of us are still losing to the illusion the elitists have created. It’s beyond time to wake up. The information is available.

Not voiting is not “givng up.” It’s a realization that the system is rigged so you won’t participate in the system anymore.

The post They Are Promising This Election WILL Be UGLY: Clinton Urges Biden to NOT Concede first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You.

Benghazi Deposition emails Hillary Clinton Intelwars judicial watch

Appeals court rules Hillary Clinton doesn’t have to sit for deposition in lawsuit over emails

A panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously on Friday that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton does not have to sit for a deposition regarding her intentions with using a private email server for government business, after all.

What are the details?

In March, a district court judge ordered Clinton to appear under oath to answer questions for a lawsuit brought by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, saying that her previous written responses “left many more questions than answers.”

But Clinton appealed the decision, and the appeals court agreed, issuing a ruling saying that she has already explained her reasoning before Congress and to Judge Emmet Sullivan — the judge who refuses to drop charges against Gen. Michael Flynn — and therefore “the deposition of Secretary Clinton, if allowed to proceed, at best seems likely to stray into topics utterly unconnected with the instant FOIA suit, and at worst could be used as a vehicle for harassment or embarrassment.”

Judicial Watch also asked to depose Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff at the State Department, and that deposition will be carried out.

The Washington Examiner explained:

Judicial Watch wants to question Clinton and Mills about the talking points for former United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice’s appearances on television shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Members of Ansar al Sharia launched a coordinated assault on Sept. 11, 2012, killing U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Clinton, Rice, and others incorrectly blamed the attack on a YouTube video.

The appeals court noted on Friday that Clinton had been long gone by the time the State Department conducted its FOIA-related email search and pointed to the fact that “several executive agencies and a House Select Committee have conducted inquiries” into Clinton’s use of a private email server and that Clinton had “also provided eleven hours of public testimony before the House Select Committee” and “has answered countless media inquiries on the matter.

The basis of the lawsuit all stems from a 2014 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit from Judicial Watch, seeking “documents related to the Benghazi attack in 2012 that killed four Americans went unanswered,” the Washington Times reported.

In its decision Friday, the appeals court echoed an assertion made by Clinton and Mill’s attorney, David Kendall, who argued that “the real purpose” of the depositions “is harassment.”

Biden administration Clinton hillary Hillary Clinton Intelwars Ready to help

Hillary Clinton hints at​ return to politics in a Biden administration: ‘I’m ready to help in any way I can’

To virtually no one’s surprise, failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton expressed openness to getting back into politics in the coming year should presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden win the election and tap her for an administration position.

The former secretary of state hinted at the potential return to Washington during a keynote conversation with The 19th, a nonprofit news organization reporting on gender and politics.

During the conversation, when asked if she would consider taking a position if offered, Clinton downplayed the idea but said she would be “ready” if the call came.

“I’m ready to help in any way I can because I think this will be a moment where every American — I don’t care what party you are, I don’t care what age, race, gender, I don’t care — every American should want to fix our country,” Clinton said. “So if you’re asked to serve, you should certainly consider that.”

Hillary Clinton in a Biden administration? ‘I’m ready to help in any way I can.’

Clinton served alongside former Vice President Biden during the Obama administration as head of the State Department from 2009 to 2013.

Her tenure at Foggy Bottom was plagued by controversy over her bungled response to the terrorist attacks on a U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, and her use of a private email server while serving as secretary. The latter of which frustrated her run for president in 2016.

In April, Clinton endorsed Biden for president, saying: “I’ve been not only a colleague of Joe Biden’s, I’ve been a friend, and I can tell you that I wish he were president right now but I can’t wait until he is — if all of us do our part to support the kind of person that we want back in the White House.”

Clinton, 72, is scheduled to speak next week at the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee along with her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as well as former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama.