Categories
Coronavirus Coronavirus tyranny COVID-19 Covid-19 tyranny Desantis Florida Intelwars Mask mandates Masking children Masks in schools McMaster South Carolina

Horowitz: SC and FL governors lead on unmasking and unshackling our children

We often hear that half the states no longer criminalize human breath and have ditched their mask mandates, but it’s simply not true. The most immoral and scientifically indefensible aspect of the mask mandate is the masking of schoolchildren for seven hours a day. That is continuing in nearly every county of most red states, with few of the governors even attempting to rein in local school boards. South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster has now provided a blueprint for how to actually enforce the termination of the mask mandate on local school districts.

On Tuesday, Gov. McMaster ordered the state’s Department of Health and Environmental Control and the state’s Department of Education to distribute waiver forms to all parents, which will allow them to opt out of any mask mandate in their district’s public school. This will ensure that all children will be allowed in school without their face covered if their parent signs the document.

“We have known for months that our schools are some of the safest places when it comes to COVID-19,” McMaster said in a press release. “With every adult in our state having the opportunity to receive a vaccine, it goes against all logic to continue to force our children – especially our youngest children – to wear masks against their parents’ wishes. Whether a child wears a mask in school is a decision that should be left only to a student’s parents.”

Here is a copy of the waiver in the Spartanburg school district.

Notice that school districts are asserting that Biden’s executive order still requires masking on buses. There is no reason there should not be a lawsuit in every school district on the grounds that the president not only violated the civil rights of children but also overstepped his authority because these buses do not cross state lines.

McMaster’s Executive Order 2021-23 also declares any local mask mandate based on original emergency orders to be pre-empted and invalid. The order further prohibits any local government entity from requiring proof of vaccination to obtain services.

It has become clear that we will have to pry the mask obsession out of these local governments with as much force as we can apply. We cannot rely on simply terminating mandates in word only, but must repeal them with as much force as they were implemented. Requiring school districts to mail out consent forms is a good first step, which will also create a clear legal cause of action against those districts that violate the policy.

To the south in Florida, Gov. DeSantis has already superseded local mandates and signed a bill banning requirement of vaccines in schools. The Florida Department of Education already announced guidelines to end the school mask mandates for the next academic year. Also this week, Florida State University announced that masks will no longer be required on campus.

On Tuesday, DeSantis called on schools to return to complete normalcy. “These kids do not need to be wearing masks, OK? I’m sorry, they don’t,” DeSantis said Tuesday at a Jacksonville high school. “We need to be able to let them be kids and let them act normally, and that’s what should be the case in the fall (and) throughout the school year.”

Either way, the governors will have to use their control over the state departments of education and health to hold localities accountable and make sure the mask craze actually comes to an end. The mask has become to the left what guns are to the right. Just as Charlton Heston said, you will have to pry the gun “from my cold, dead hands,” so too we will have to pry the masks from the warm, moist, bacteria-filled faces of the COVID cultists. That will require an indefatigable grassroots pressure campaign that must include lawsuits, naming and shaming county and state bureaucrats, and a sustained focus on local elections.

Share
Categories
CDC Covid vaccines COVID-19 Dr. anthony fauci FDA Intelwars Pfizer vaccine Vaccines for children Vaccines for kids

Fauci: It’s ‘very important’ to vaccinate your kids, and if you’re vaccinated, you don’t need a mask outside

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said this week that it’s “very important” for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19, but doesn’t think parents should be required to have their children vaccinated before kids can go back to school. He also said vaccinated people do not need to wear masks outdoors.

“Whenever you’re talking about requiring something, that’s always a charged issue. So I’m not so sure we should be requiring children at all,” the top White House health adviser said on “CBS This Morning” Thursday. “We should be encouraging them. But you got to be careful when you make a requirement of something, that usually gets you into a lot of pushback, understandable pushback.”

The Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention this week approved the use of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for adolescents ages 12 to 15. Beginning Thursday, anyone 12 and older is eligible to receive the vaccine.

CDC data demonstrates that children in grades K-12 are at low risk of contracting and spreading COVID-19. In-person learning at school has not been associated with a substantial increase in community transmission of the virus, but there is ongoing debate over whether kids should be vaccinated before schools open in the fall.

Some parents remain hesitant to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. According to the KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor, a research project that tracks public opinions on the vaccines, 23% of parents with children ages 12-15 say the definitely will not have their kids vaccinated, while 30% say they will get their kids vaccinated right away. Another 26% said they want to wait to see how the vaccine is working, and 18% said they will only have their kids vaccinated if their school requires it.

“You don’t want to in any manner or form have the parents feel like they’re doing something wrong by questioning,” Fauci said. “It’s a perfectly normal thing to be concerned about your children and to question. And that’s the reason why you want to get them as much information as you possibly can.”

“It is very important for children to get vaccinated,” he continued, acknowledging that while children are at a low risk of serious infection from COVID-19, there are still some kids who become ill and are in “serious trouble.”

There are documented cases of children who contract COVID-19 continuing to have symptoms lasting more than 120 days after getting sick, a phenomena becoming known as “long covid.” At least five hospitals in the U.S. have opened “long-haul” pediatric clinics to care for children with lingering illness from the virus. While these cases happen at a “low rate,” Fauci advised parents to take preventive precautions by getting their children vaccinated.

“The other aspect of it that they need to understand, is that when children get infected — even though they may not, in fact, get serious illness — they could inadvertently and innocently pass the infection on to someone else, perhaps another member of the family who is vulnerable and could get in trouble,” Fauci added.

He reminded viewers that there are benefits to being vaccinated, according to CDC recommendations.

“If you were vaccinated, you don’t have to wear a mask outside,” Fauci said. “If you were going into a completely crowded situation where people are essentially falling all over each other, then you wear a mask. But any other time, if you’re vaccinated and you’re outside, put aside your mask. You don’t have to wear it.”

Share
Categories
Bette Midler Coronavirus vaccines COVID-19 Covid-19 vaccines for kids Intelwars Social Media Twitter Vaccinate kids

Bette Midler tweets ‘threat’ over unvaccinated kids: ‘If my kid can’t bring peanut butter to school, then yours can’t bring the deathly plague’

Actress Bette Midler’s posted a tweet about threatening to expose allergic children to peanuts that fell flat for many social media followers. Midler took heat on Sunday after she shared a tweet about forcing parents to vaccinate their children against the coronavirus.

In her tweet, Midler compared permitting unvaccinated children to attend schools to bringing peanut products to the classroom despite the danger children who may have peanut allergies could face.

She shared, “If my kid can’t bring peanut butter to school then yours can’t bring the deathly plague. Vaccinate or I’m bringing the Jiffy.”

What else?

The Food and Drug Administration did not announce the authorized emergency use of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12 to 15 years until Monday, one day after Midler’s tweet.

Children who are allergic to peanuts and peanut products can sometimes find themselves in middle of a nasty anaphylaxis response.

Symptoms of anaphylaxis, according to the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, include “impaired breathing, swelling in the throat, a sudden drop in blood pressure, pale skin or blue lips, fainting, and dizziness.”

What was the response?

One mom, who referred to herself as “super liberal,” took Midler to task over her remarks.

She wrote, “I’m super liberal, very pro vax and science but this isn’t funny. My son, like millions of others is severely allergic to peanuts and tree nuts! If he touches it he gets hives. If he eats even the tiniest amount, his throat closes, no amount of CPR would help. Do better!”

Another user added, “We are vaccinated. Our kids can’t be vaccinated yet. Parents of kids with allergies have seen epi pens save their kids lives. We are pro science. Imagine volunteering to vaccinate your community and seeing this after holding your kid in anaphylaxis because this threat happened?”

“‘Get vaccinated or I’m gonna start killing kids with peanut allergies’ is definitely a sales pitch,” one user countered.

Another user pointed out that Midler’s remarks were insensitive at best, and wrote, “There are better analogies than this. As someone who has two kids allergic to peanuts this is just stupid.”

“Choosy moms choose Jif and there is no FDA approved pediatric coronavirus vax as of today,” another user tweeted on Sunday. “I’m not certain where you’re going with this meme but wishing death on children is certainly a call for self reflection.”

Midler has not issued any updates on the backlash she received following the controversial Sunday tweet.

Share
Categories
COVID-19 In-person learning Intelwars san francisco San francisco teachers union

San Francisco concocts plan to send HS seniors to school for one day to obtain millions in state funds: ‘Blatant money grab’

The San Francisco Unified School District is being accused of a “blatant money grab” after concocting a plan to have high school students briefly return to in-person school in order to nab millions in state reopening funds.

What are the details?

The San Francisco teachers’ union recently announced that high school seniors would get to return to in-person school starting this Friday.

The union described the development as “exciting news,” and union President Susan Solomon told the San Francisco Chronicle the return would allow seniors to spend time with friends and teachers before graduation.

“UESF brought the initial proposal to SFUSD so that our current graduating seniors would have the opportunity to spend some time in-person on campus with teachers and their peers during their last few weeks of high school as they say goodbye to classmates and prepare for graduation and the next chapter of their lives,” Solomon said.

But what the teachers’ union did not say is that the return would be for one day only — and students would not even be in the classroom with their teachers.

According to Chronicle, the city school district and teachers’ union agreed to a deal that would bring the class of 2021 to school “for at least one day before the end of the school year” so that “the city’s public schools can qualify for $12 million in state reopening funds.”

To obtain the reopening funds, California law required school districts to reopen in-person instruction for elementary students and at least one entire middle or high school grade. The deadline to qualify for the funds is May 15, one day after the SFUSD and San Francisco teachers’ union suddenly agreed on an in-person return for seniors.

As part of the deal, seniors will be allowed to attend in-person at “one of two school sites,” and instead of instruction from their teachers, they will receive “in-person supervision.”

More from the Chronicle:

Each cohort of students would have two teachers or staff supervising them on campus. Activities might include “end of high school conversations,” or “college and career exploration,” district officials said, who were still working out the cohort size. Only two high school sites would be made available to seniors, meaning most who do return won’t be at their own school. As of Monday, it was unclear how many students would accept the offer, with the district polling families to see how many of the 4,000 12th graders want to return.

What was the reaction?

Decreasing the Distance, a San Francisco group advocating in-person learning, slammed the decision.

“What message does this give our kids about what they are worth and how adults take care of our vulnerable populations, including kids? Does this show them that they matter, or just that the money matters?” the group told the Chronicle. “One senior told us she wants to return, but not like this. Her reaction: ‘It’s too little too late. School’s over.'”

Meanwhile, California state Rep. Phil Ting (D) said San Francisco might not qualify for the funds because the deal is violating the spirit of the incentive, which was to promote a permanent return to in-person learning.

“It definitely doesn’t meet the spirit of the law,” Ting said. “Kids were supposed to come back in person. Kids were supposed to come back to learn.”

How is COVID in SF schools?

Despite being one of the last school districts in the country to return to some in-person learning — elementary students and some middle and high school students returned last month — in-person transmission of COVID-19 has been virtually nonexistent.

In fact, since 20,000 students and staff returned last month, there have been only 20 positive COVID cases inside San Francisco schools.

Of those, zero originated from within school buildings.

“In other words, zero cases were related to in-school transmission at SFUSD,” the city Department of Public Health said.

Share
Categories
Children Children and vaccines Coronavirus Coronavirus tyranny Coronavirus vaccines covid COVID-19 Covid-19 tyranny Covid-19 vaccines Intelwars Vaccinating children

Horowitz: The indefensible rush to experiment on children

Riddle me this: If the COVID vaccine for adults is so impervious and miraculous that it justifies emergency and immediate use for children after just a few months of trials, then, by definition, there is no need for children to take the vaccine. It can only potentially cause harm, since the virus doesn’t affect them, when we already know that any adult has had access to the vaccine for quite some time. If it really works, there should be no concern of unvaccinated children spreading it to vaccinated adults, especially when children’s transmission rates are so low to begin with. So what is motivating this frantic rush to experiment on children?

Nobody can justify an emergency use authorization for a novel mRNA vaccine on children because the risks far outweigh any potential benefits. Even if we are to trust Pfizer’s own trial data (p. 27) and allow the foxes of profit to guard the academic henhouse, there is a 1-in-333 risk for a serious adverse event (SEA) from the vaccine. Their trial resulted in 5 SEAs out of 1,127 12- to 15-year-olds in the vaccine group, as opposed to 1 in the 1,127 of the placebo group. That was the number of serious adverse events in just 30 days. If this excess absolute risk of 0.003 (0.3%) for SAEs holds up, that means for each 333 children 12-15 years old who are vaccinated, there would be one serious adverse event.

One in 333 doesn’t sound like a lot, but it’s a lot more than zero, and it’s their own biased data. Plus, we have zero trials longer than just one month, so we have no idea about the long-term effects.

So, what are the benefits? There is no data on children, but we know from Israeli data on the Pfizer vaccine for adults published in the New England Journal of Medicine (p.22), that the “needed to treat” number of vaccines to save a life from COVID is 27,778. Their study showed 19 fewer deaths in the vaccine group over the placebo group out of 526,877 people. That is 1/0.00036, which is 27,778.

As Dr. Andy Bostom of Brown University points out, if children 12-15, on average, suffer a serious adverse event every 333 doses, that would add up to about 84 SAEs before you get to one life saved at roughly 27,700 doses.

But the risk vs. return is likely much worse than an 84:1 spread. Remember, the Israeli data covered vaccination for adults only. Now that adults already have access to the vaccine and anyone who is vulnerable is protected, there is zero benefit to going a step farther from the current baseline and vaccinating children. They are exponentially less likely to get seriously ill from the virus and are also much less likely to spread it. And again, any adult who is vulnerable is already vaccinated, so there is no value add to vaccinating kids. Thus, the number needed to treat to save a life at this point for children in a universe of vaccinated adults is likely much higher.

According to statute (21 U.S.C. §360bbb–3(c)(2)(B)), a medical product can only be offered under emergency use if “the known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat such disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.” There is simply no way this condition can be fulfilled with kids.

Remember, the vaccine companies are absolved of all liability. The entire justification for such a move is that the need for a vaccine is so compelling that we must override all norms related to research, development, and liability. How can anyone possibly say that the risk to children justifies the use of a truncated study period?

Now riddle me this: Why is it that they are rushing an experimental, never-before-used, mRNA on children who don’t get critically ill from this virus, yet the government refuses to approve the use of ivermectin, which has been dispensed 3.7 billion times, even for seniors on ventilators with zero options? It takes a court order just to get hospitals to comply.

The answer is that they have to shut down all alternative treatments in order to approve the vaccine. The same statute ((c)(3)) states that the treatment, in this case the vaccine, can only be approved under emergency use if “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition.” Were people to know that there are numerous early, middle, and late-stage treatments, it would nuke the market for the vaccines. As such, they must judge the early therapeutics, including those used regularly for other ailments, with an impossible standard, while rushing through the vaccines at all costs.

Haven’t we used children enough to assuage our guilt the past year? Can we just leave them alone?

Share
Categories
CDC Cdc guidance on mask wearing COVID-19 face masks hhs Intelwars Mask mandate

Liberal network CNN presses Health Sec. Becerra on his call for vaccinated people to keep wearing masks. He has trouble defending it.

Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra went on CNN Monday to attempt to explain why fully vaccinated people should continue to mask-up.

And he struggled to make the case to the Democrat-family cable outlet.

What happened?

Becerra is the most recent member of the Biden administration to come out and contradict the latest face mask guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Late last month, the new CDC guidelines said that fully vaccinated Americans do not need to wear masks outdoors, or even indoors in many cases. Fully vaccinated people, the CDC said, can gather outdoors without wearing a mask except in certain crowded settings and can also gather indoors without wearing a mask or staying six feet apart.

President Joe Biden told NBC’s “Today” just a couple days after the CDC update that he would keep wearing a mask outdoors because “it’s a patriotic duty.” And last Friday he said to reporters who asked about his continued masking that being fully vaccinated and still wearing a mask indoors is “good policy.”

The president’s COVID czar, Jeff Zients, erroneously told CNN that Biden was following CDC guidance by wearing a mask, even after being fully vaccinated since January.

And senior Biden adviser Anita Dunn defended the president’s continued mask-wearing by saying people should follow CDC guidelines.

On Monday, Sec. Becerra attempted to make the case to CNN’s audience for fully vaccinated people to still wear face masks.

CNN host John Berman asked the secretary about Dr. Anthony Fauci’s remarks Sunday that it might be time to relax indoor mask mandates, especially for people who have been vaccinated.

“Who are you protecting, if everyone’s vaccinated, by wearing a mask?” Berman queried.

Becerra responded by claiming that the administration’s guidance “focuses on safety” and is the “best advice possible.”

What does that look like? In Becerra’s mind, it means fully vaccinated people masking up because — well — they could still be carrying the virus and spread COVID-19.

What did Becerra say?

“We still want you to be as safe as possible, that’s why the indoor policy should still be masking,” the HHS chief said. “But clearly, if you’ve been vaccinated fully and you’re with folks who are also vaccinated, John, the risk does diminish radically. But you could end up being a carrier and not know it and if somebody hasn’t been vaccinated and doesn’t wear a mask, guess what, there’s still that potential of getting COVID.”

Berman responded that he and his co-workers are inoculated and their safety is not being “impacted” by wearing a mask. He then indicated that perhaps it’s a matter of personal responsibility and assumption of risk for each person.

“If someone else is not vaccinated, it might be THEIR safety that’s being affected, so there’s two issues here,” Berman said. “Number one: Is that my concern anymore that someone who’s chosen to be unvaccinated is making a bad choice? And question two is maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building.”

Becerra responded that he still wants to convince everyone to act in what he says is their own best interests and “be as safe as possible.”

“You know, it’s always difficult to get people on motorcycles to wear helmets — for their own safety. It was tough at times to get people to wear seatbelts — for their own safety,” he said. “What we’re simply saying is the best guidance from those who are the experts in health care is be as safe as possible by wearing a mask, even if you’re vaccinated.”

The CDC experts’ guidance does not agree with Becerra’s assertion.

Share
Categories
Coronavirus Pandemic COVID-19 Dr. anthony fauci Gain of function research Intelwars Rand Paul Wuhan lab leak theory

Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Fauci clash again over NIH funding for Wuhan lab and virus leak theory

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci denied that the National Institutes of Health has ever funded “gain of function research” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — the Chinese lab that became the focus of intense scrutiny at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic — during yet another heated back-and-forth with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Fauci appeared Tuesday before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to testify on the ongoing pandemic response. When it was his turn to ask questions, Paul grilled Fauci on NIH funding for viral research in Wuhan, China, and the possibility that the novel coronavirus that caused the current global pandemic was a product of “gain of function” research that leaked from that lab.

“Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?” Paul asked.

“Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely incorrect,” Fauci retorted. “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund ‘gain of function research’ in the Wuhan Institute.”

“Gain of function” research involves genetically enhancing viral pathogens in order to predict which may become especially dangerous to the human population. The research is controversial because of the risk that a virus found naturally occurring in animals that is modified to be able to infect humans could accidentally — or deliberately — be released and cause a pandemic.

Paul made numerous references to an article published by New York Magazine in January that described the development of gain of function research and how a U.S. virologist named Dr. Ralph Baric collaborated with Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study bat and human coronaviruses beginning in 2015. The article noted there is no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was artificially created and subsequently leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, but also acknowledged there is a lack of direct evidence for the virus occurring naturally.

Between 2014 and 2019, a U.S. nonprofit group called the EcoHealth Alliance diverted $600,000 in National Institutes of Health subgrants to the Wuhan Institute to study bat coronaviruses. In March, Politico reported that the U.S. government was aware WIV was conducting gain-of-function research “on a much larger scale than was publicly disclosed.”

Fauci insisted that claims the NIH grants were used to fund gain-of-function research were false. He defended the subgrants to the Wuhan Institute, which he says were used to study coronaviruses in bats.

“Let me explain to you why that was done, the SARS-CoV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected,” Fauci said.

“Or perhaps it would be irresponsible to send it to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this knowledge and with this incredibly dangerous viruses,” Paul interrupted.

Fauci then adamantly denied that he supported gain-of-function research in China.

Paul’s next question dealt with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 escaped from the Wuhan lab.

“Will you in front of this group categorically say that the COVID-19 virus could not have occurred by serial passage in a laboratory?” Paul asked.

“I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I’m fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China,” Fauci said in response. “However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

After the hearing, Paul accused Fauci of dissembling during his questions.

Share
Categories
@NYT CDC Coronavirus Coronavirus transmission COVID-19 Covid-19 transmission Intelwars New York Times Outdoor covid transmission Outdoor mask requirement

Horowitz: NYT catches CDC in gravely consequential lie about outdoor transmission

From day one of this pandemic, it was abundantly clear that outdoor transmission — aside from perhaps an infected individual screaming in someone’s face — is essentially zero. Had the CDC properly conveyed this fact to the public, it could have preserved an amazing quality of life for so many people that would have included continuation of children’s play and sports, seniors enjoying more friendship, fresh air, and vitamin D, and a happier, less depressed society. Yet, to this day, they are continuing to force children to wear masks even outdoors in the summer heat.

In what Rush Limbaugh used to call “a random act of journalism,” New York Times reporter David Leonhardt published a very thorough takedown of the CDC’s outdoor masking guidance. The takedown brings into question how we can trust anything else they tell us when they seem hell-bent on playing up the danger of the virus at all costs and in all situations, over-stating the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical intervention, and underplaying the concerns about side effects from mask-wearing and the vaccines.

Several weeks ago, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky stated at a White House press conference that there’s “increasing data that suggests that most of transmission is happening indoors rather than outdoors.” She gave a number of “less than 10 percent of documented transmission” occurring outdoors.

The problem with this statement is that the number is really much closer to zero, and this fact was known over a year ago. As Leonhardt points out, some epidemiologists he spoke to believe it may be below 0.1 percent, and “almost all” transmission “seems to have involved crowded places or close conversation.”

“Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year,” writes Leonhardt. “(The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving.”

This is not just a matter of semantics. As the article observes, based on this notion that there is still some very measurable transmission outdoors, the CDC is still recommending all unvaccinated people wear masks outdoors, including children in summer camp. They also continue to give people the impression that one can catch the virus naturally outdoors just casually passing someone, which is continuing to discourage those who are really fearful of the virus from even living normal lives outdoors.

Indeed, not a single known case of casual outdoor transmission has been documented in the entire world. A study of 7,324 cases in Wuhan found just one outdoor transmission in a case where someone had a sustained conversation with an individual who already had symptoms. A study in Ireland found the ratio to be 1 in 1,000.

Now extrapolate the statistical anomaly of outdoor transmission to children who are not exhibiting symptoms for a virus that doesn’t even meaningfully affect them, and we are still making them wear masks in the summer heat without any evidence that masks work even indoors.

According to the New York Times, much of the reputed outdoor transmission in the academic research the CDC relied upon occurred at construction sites in Singapore that were likely indoors. And of course, nobody ever bothered to research whether those individuals were indeed wearing masks, as seems to be the case in most Asian countries, which would disprove the efficacy of masks anyway.

Rather than question the CDC’s illogical premise on mask-wearing altogether, Leonhardt continues to assume masks work indoors as a law of gravity and suggests that the CDC should issue the following message: “Masks make a huge difference indoors and rarely matter outdoors.”

The obvious question anyone should be asking is that if the CDC is exaggerating the need to wear masks outdoors, why are we to trust them about the efficacy of wearing them indoors? Both the CDC and the WHO have recently admitted that the six-foot rule is a complete hoax and that it’s primarily aerosols, remaining suspended in the air indoors and traveling farther than six feet, that are transmitting the virus.

First, this is a further indictment of their unwillingness to categorically bless normal living outdoors, given how easy it is to transmit indoors. But more broadly, as I’ve explained in great detail, the aerosols that are small enough to suspend in air and travel great distances are, by definition, small enough to get through the gaps and pores of a face mask, especially ones that are not rated as high as N-95s and above. But we are somehow to believe the fake advertising of the CDC on masking as if it were brought down by Moses on the tablets.

Notice a pattern here? The misinformation always flows in the direction of creating more panic, fear, and social control, while also boosting Big Pharma, though not enough to interfere with the control, because if vaccines were that awesome, all masking should be over with. Even 14 months after amassing incontrovertible scientific data proving children are not at risk and outdoor transmission is statistically insignificant, they are still willing to advocate life-and-death policies that contradict this science. This is what we call political science, not life science.

Share
Categories
agenda Biontech Children COVID-19 Dr. janet Woodcock emergency use authoriation experimental gene therapy false statistics FDA government is slavery Headline News Intelwars jabs liars LIES New World Order not vaccines numbers Pfizer plandemic propaganda roll up sleeves ruling class scamdemic Shots slaves vaccines wake up

FDA Authorized Gene Therapy Shots For Children As Young As 12

The Food and Drug Administration has “authorized” (not given approval) for the experimental gene therapy shots created by Pfizer and labeled as vaccines to be used on children as young as 12. Despite the low death rates from their admittedly inflated numbers, the ruling class will now begin injecting young Americans.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

Parents Increasingly Reject COVID “Vaccine” For Kids

“Today’s action allows for a younger population to be protected from Covid-19, bringing us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy and to ending the pandemic,” acting FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock said in a statement on Monday. “Parents and guardians can rest assured that the agency undertook a rigorous and thorough review of all available data, as we have with all of our Covid-19 vaccine emergency use authorizations.”

“The FDA has determined that Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine has met the statutory criteria to amend the EUA and that the known and potential benefits of this vaccine in individuals 12 years of age and older outweigh the known and potential risks, supporting the vaccine’s use in this population,” the press release states. -RT

The timing couldn’t be more perfect considering they are running out of slaves willing to take this thing voluntarily.  The decision to “approve” the emergency use of this “vaccine” opens up the shot to a whole new segment of the population after inoculations were previously allowed only down to the age of 16. It also comes at a time when all US states have worked through their vaccine priority groups and made shots available to everyone 16 and older.

New Poll: U.S. Is Running Out Of Adults “Willing To Be Vaccinated”

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data (which they admitted they inflate to propagate fear) shows that as of April 30, there had been about 1.5 million US Covid-19 cases among children aged 11-17. Children typically suffer more minor symptoms than adults. While 11- to 17-year-olds account for about 4.5% of overall infections, children under 17 make up less than 0.1% of Covid-19 deaths.

Even with their inflated statistics and useless PCR diagnostic tests and calling everything from gunshot wounds to car accident deaths “covid”, there still is no reason at all that anyone under the age of 30 has anything to worry about. The fact that parents will give their child this vaccine that will do far more damage than this scamdemic ever could is a testament to where we are as a society. It’s disturbingly sad, actually.

The post FDA Authorized Gene Therapy Shots For Children As Young As 12 first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
Cdc mask guidance Coronavirus Pandemic COVID-19 Health Intelwars Science Us centers for disease control and prevention

CDC’s misleading stat exaggerates risk of outdoor COVID-19 spread. Agency says it was done to protect people.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used a misleading statistic in its updated mask wearing guidance last month that exaggerated the risk of contracting COVID-19 while outdoors, according to the New York Times.

When CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced the updated guidance on mask-wearing, she told reporters that studies showed “less than 10 percent” of documented COVID-19 transmissions occurs outdoors. But several epidemiologists who spoke to the Times say the CDC’s benchmark is misleading.

The number “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” said Dr. Muge Cevik, a virologist at the University of St. Andrews.

Epidemiologists who spoke to the Times say the actual rate of outdoor transmission is less than 1% and may even be below 0.1%. If outdoor transmission does occur, it happens in crowded places or during close conversation, the Times’ David Leonhardt reported.

By saying outdoor transmission is “less than 10 percent” of COVID-19 transmission, the CDC actually made the risk of catching COVID outdoors seem far greater than it actually is.

Leonhardt wrote:

This isn’t just a gotcha math issue. It is an example of how the C.D.C. is struggling to communicate effectively, and leaving many people confused about what’s truly risky. C.D.C. officials have placed such a high priority on caution that many Americans are bewildered by the agency’s long list of recommendations. Zeynep Tufekci of the University of North Carolina, writing in The Atlantic, called those recommendations “simultaneously too timid and too complicated.”

They continue to treat outdoor transmission as a major risk. The C.D.C. says that unvaccinated people should wear masks in most outdoor settings and vaccinated people should wear them at “large public venues”; summer camps should require children to wear masks virtually “at all times.”

These recommendations would be more grounded in science if anywhere close to 10 percent of Covid transmission were occurring outdoors. But it is not. There is not a single documented Covid infection anywhere in the world from casual outdoor interactions, such as walking past someone on a street or eating at a nearby table.

He went on to explain how the academic research cited by the CDC to come up with the “10 percent” number seems suspect. Frequently cited studies linked most outdoor transmissions of COVID-19 to construction sites in Singapore.

“In one study, 95 of 10,926 worldwide instances of transmission are classified as outdoors; all 95 are from Singapore construction sites. In another study, four of 103 instances are classified as outdoors; again, all four are from Singapore construction sites,” Leonhardt wrote.

Noting that it doesn’t make sense for all cases of outdoor transmission to be linked to construction sites, Leonhardt said Times investigative reporter Shashank Bengali learned that the government agency that collects data on COVID-19 in Singapore did not categorize construction-site cases as outdoor transmission.

In fact, there is reason to think many of the infections at those sites occurred indoors, with workers congregating in enclosed spaces for meetings, eating lunch together, or working in buildings that have completed concrete shells but need their interiors constructed.

Additionally, academic researchers collecting data on COVID-19 from government databases made a judgment call to define outdoor spaces “very broadly.”

“We had to settle on one classification for building sites, and ultimately decided on a conservative outdoor definition,” said French researcher Quentin Leclerc, who authored one of the papers analyzing Singapore. Another paper defined “workplace, health care, education, social events, travel, catering, leisure and shopping” settings as outdoors, only counting “mass accommodation and residential facilities” as indoor settings.

The result was many cases of indoor transmission were reported as outdoor transmission by media outlets citing the CDC, which cited this research.

In a statement to the New York Times, a CDC spokesperson described the “less than 10 percent” number as a “conservative estimate” and explained that the CDC “errs on the side of protection when it comes to recommending steps to protect public health.”

The attitude of the CDC echoes what White House top medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNN about the CDC back in March: “They’re being careful, understandably. They want to get science, they want to get data, and then when you don’t have the data and you don’t have the actual evidence, then you’ve got to make a judgment call.”

Share
Categories
Coronavirus COVID-19 Covid-19 tyranny Intelwars lockdowns pandemic Vitamin D

Horowitz: Stay-at-home orders are the worst thing you can do in a pandemic

It’s clear that the mask obsession will continue indefinitely, especially in the blue states. When it comes to lockdowns, it might appear that even all the blue states have moved on from them at this point. However, it’s important for anyone who cares about liberty and true public health to make sure a provision is codified into law to ban stay-at-home orders in the future. Failure to do so will ensure that lockdowns become the new baseline policy response to any future pandemic flu or even erroneous prediction by the “experts” of an impending pandemic.

If you listen carefully to every governor announcing the end of restrictions (except masks, of course) they are not doing so out of admission that such policies don’t work and are actually harmful. It’s just that the current case level no longer justifies the continuation of those policies and saddling a Democrat administration with the political liability of the economic consequences headed into the midterm elections. But the minute there is a warning from Fauci and his ilk of another pandemic, perhaps even the return of the seasonal flu, they will immediately push lockdowns.

The numbers have been examined upside-down and inside-out, and nobody can find a single correlation between lockdowns and positive results relative to any control group that did not implement those policies. Dozens of studies have shown zero correlation based on geographical and seasonal comparison. The only correlation between lockdowns and unique outcomes is more unemployment:

A new working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research demonstrates why that is the case.

“Micro evidence contradicts the public-health ideal in which households would be places of solitary confinement and zero transmission,” concluded University of Chicago economist Casey B. Mulligan after analyzing the progression of primary and secondary attack rates by profession and comparing them to household rates. “Instead, the evidence suggests that ‘households show the highest transmission rates’ and that ‘households are high-risk settings for the transmission of [COVID-19].'”

We always knew that household transmission was the key ingredient to the pandemic early on. Last year, data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health showed 83% of cases resulted from household exposure. At the same time, none of the venues from a list of 21 categories – including K-12 schools, restaurants and food courts, and retail and services – ever represented more than 2% of the share of cases.

Thus, we shut down our economies and left people at home for longer periods of time with less ventilation and closer quarters than they would have otherwise spent their time.

What’s worse is that when all the public statements from Fauci Inc., state advertisements, and highway signs suggested people should “stay home, save lives,” many fearful citizens took that literally. I have neighbors who literally never left their homes and stayed home in close quarters, living with depression and anxiety. Not only did that make it more likely that they would spread the virus to their households if they caught it during one of the times they inevitably had to be around other people, but it depleted their health in a way that made them most vulnerable to this virus. All the evidence shows that exercise, low BMI, and exposure to sun and vitamin D are among the best ways to boost one’s immune system against serious illness from COVID-19. The lockdown mentality and policies actually ensured that people would suffer from all three of these vulnerabilities like pouring lighter fluid on a fire.

Weight gain

The mix of panic-inducing anxiety and reduced human activity caused Americans to gain weight … big-time. According to a survey conducted by the American Psychological Association, 61% experienced undesired weight gains during the COVID panic of the past year, with the average weight gain being a whopping 29 pounds. Millennials reported gaining an average of 41 pounds, a trend that will create a long-term time-bomb for heart disease, diabetes, and an endless litany of other ailments.

It turns out, as we’ve known all along, that obesity is the 800-pound gorilla in the room for almost anyone under the age of 65 who gets a severe case of COVID-19. A CDC study from March found “A J-shaped (nonlinear) relationship was observed between continuous BMI and risk” of three outcomes: ICU admissions, ventilation, and death. Overall, 78% of the people in the study sample who were hospitalized with COVID-19 were overweight or obese. Thus, we took a younger population that was largely unaffected by this virus and made a great many more of them vulnerable through excess weight gain.

Loss of exercise

Not only is exercise critical to staving off obesity, it also puts people at inherently lower risk of serious illness from COVID-19. A recent study of over 48,000 people diagnosed with the virus last year found that lack of exercise makes the patient 1.73 times more likely to die from COVID with those “constantly inactive” being 2.49 times more likely to die.

“Even after we included variables such as obesity and smoking in the analysis, we still saw inactivity was strongly associated with much higher odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death compared with moderate physical activity or any activity at all,” said one of the co-authors of the study, which was published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. They found that “other than being over age 60 or having a history of organ transplant, being consistently inactive conferred the highest risk for death from COVID-19.”

So, what did the government and media do? Encourage everyone to stay home! They even closed the gyms and arrested gym owners. Then the gyms that were opened had mask mandates, and in many places, they mandated masks outdoors. What was the net effect? Further dissuading people from exercising, thereby making them more vulnerable to COVID.

Another American study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that masking led to less exercise. “Cloth face masks led to a 14% reduction in exercise time and 29% decrease in VO2max, attributed to perceived discomfort associated with mask-wearing,” concluded the authors of the randomized controlled trial. “Compared with no mask, participants reported feeling increasingly short of breath and claustrophobic at higher exercise intensities while wearing a cloth face mask.”

Lack of sunshine

It’s already become clear from dozens of studies that one’s vitamin D levels are nearly perfectly correlated with outcomes of COVID-illness. Yet so many people took the dictate to stay home literally and never left their houses even to get sunshine. Most Americans are already vitamin D deficient, and government never warned people doing this to take daily high-dose supplements. In fact, they never apprised the public that vitamin D should have been the mask and toilet paper of last spring. The result is that we had people dying a year later after they had months to bump up their vitamin D levels and instead saw them plummet as they avoided the sun’s vitamin D as if it were the plague itself. Wearing a mask over the few parts of one’s body that are exposed to direct sunlight certainly didn’t help either.

Imagine if our government and media had made exercise, weight loss, and vitamin D the crazed obsession that was instead directed to masking and lockdowns, which worked against all three COVID-mitigating strategies. Imagine how many fewer people would have died from COVID and other ailments.

Taken together, I don’t think the government could possibly have found a better way to maximize deaths from both COVID and the COVID response than their approach of panic, fear, lockdowns, and masking.

How prophetic were the words of D.A. Henderson, the former dean of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, who is widely credited with helping to eradicate smallpox, when he wrote in 2016 that lockdowns would produce so many negative effects that “this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.” He advised, “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” If only we had listened.

Share
Categories
authoritarianism CDC Child abuse children playing Coronavirus COVID-19 Critical Thinking Dr. Rochelle Walensky government is slavery Headline News illness Intelwars liars lockdowns Masks overreaction oxygen restriction political parasites ritualistic shame muzzles ruling class Science Virus wake up

Covid Authoritarians Abuse Children

This article was originally published by Ron Paul at The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. 

Centers for Diseases Control (CDC) Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky has “recommended” that children wear masks while playing. Her offered reason is to ensure Covid is not spread by “heavy breathing” of children near each other while around a soccer ball.

Dr. Walensky’s recommendation is one more example of Covid authoritarians’ refusal to “listen to the science.” The science says no to lockdowns and masks. The masks are not blocking the very small viruses in “heavy breathing.” Dr. Walensky also ignores the science showing that wearing a mask while exercising or playing sports has negative health effects.

Dr. Walensky’s most outrageous disregard of science is ignoring the fact that children are statistically unlikely to be at risk of either spreading Covid or becoming very sick from it.

Dr. Walensky’s recommendation is one of many examples of how children are harmed by the overreaction to coronavirus. Many children have had their physical and mental health damaged because they cannot go to school, play with their friends, or even have a birthday party because of the lockdowns.

Disappointingly, but not surprisingly, the two major teachers’ unions — the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) — have stood in the way of reopening schools. Teachers’ union leaders have claimed it is too dangerous for teachers to resume in-person instruction, even though adults are at little or no risk of getting Covid from children. Sadly, teachers’ unions are disregarding the interest of children. Recently released emails show the CDC disregarded the science in favor of the AFT’s restrictive guidance when developing recommendations concerning reopening schools.

The negative effects of lockdowns and school closings for children have led many parents to consider alternatives to government schools. Some private schools have not just remained open, they have followed the science and not forced their students to wear masks. Many parents are also considering homeschooling. Homeschooling parents obviously can ensure their children are not forced to obey mask, social distancing, and other unscientific mandates.

Parents interested in providing their children with a quality education that emphasizes the ideas of liberty should consider my homeschooling curriculum. The Ron Paul Curriculum provides students with a well-rounded education that includes rigorous programs in history, mathematics, and the physical and natural sciences. The curriculum also provides instruction in personal finance. Students can develop superior communication skills via intensive writing and public speaking courses. Another feature of my curriculum is that it provides students the opportunity to create and run their own internet-based businesses.

The government and history sections of the curriculum emphasize Austrian economics, libertarian political theory, and the history of liberty. However, unlike government schools, my curriculum never puts ideological indoctrination ahead of education.

Interactive forums allow students to learn from each other outside of a formal setting. The curriculum’s emphasis on self-directed learning and student interaction makes it ideal for parents who need to work from home but still want to homeschool their children.

I encourage parents looking at alternatives to government schools to go to RonPaulCurriculum.com for more information about my homeschooling program.

The post Covid Authoritarians Abuse Children first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
American Federation of Teachers COVID-19 Fox News Intelwars Martha MacCallum randi weingarten School reopening teachers unions

Teachers union president blames Trump and implies vaccine-hesitant Fox News viewers are why schools aren’t fully reopened

The president of the second-largest teachers union in the United States said Monday that she supports schools fully reopening for the fall semester but would not commit to doing so.

In a contentious interview, Fox News host Martha MacCallum and American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten argued about school reopenings and whether teachers unions had successfully lobbied to keep schools closed even though scientific evidence suggested children are at low risk for spreading COVID-19, as the New York Post reported last week.

Weingarten told MacCallum that she hopes schools will be open in the fall and that her union would not require children to be vaccinated before schools reopen. She did not definitively state that schools would be fully opened this fall. She defended the teachers unions’ record on school openings, casting blame for the slow return to in-person instruction on the Trump administration, and on vaccine hesitancy among Fox News viewers.

“Right now 97% of schools are open,” Weingarten claimed, but MacCallum interjected to clarify that only 67% of schools were reopen for full-time in-person instruction.

“We believe that the conditions have changed now so that everybody can be back in full time, but the bottom line is this: I begged the Trump administration, I can show you — I have many, many letters right now. I went to my office to find them,” Weingarten said. “I begged the Trump administration to do exactly what the Biden administration did, which is real safety guidance that Trump, that the former president didn’t mock every other day.”

Weingarten went on to praise the Biden administration for issuing the safety guidance AFT had lobbied for, but MacCallum interrupted her to point out that the Trump administration had aggressively pushed for schools to reopen because studies were showing viral “transmission among children is very low.”

She added that the U.S. has lagged behind countries like China and Russia in sending children back to school for in-person instruction.

Weingarten blamed the teachers union opposition to reopening schools on former President Donald Trump.

“If we had actually listened to Dr. [Robert] Redfield and the CDC last May and that the president — the former president — hadn’t kept on changing his mind and changing these things, we would have gotten more schools back in session,” she claimed.

“Really?” An incredulous MacCallum responded. “Because, what you told me was that there wasn’t money, that some of these schools had problems like mold, I mean, all these things started getting into the mix that were not part of the equation at all when parents were just wanting to get their kids to go back.

“Obviously, you didn’t have the pull with the prior administration, but in this administration there’s been $20 million that has gone from — to Democrats — from teachers unions and teacher organizations,” MacCallum continued, referencing the Post’s report that AFT donated $20 million to the Democratic Party during the 2020 election. “So that money seems to be working.”

Weingarten dismissed the accusation, pointing out that school reopenings were complicated by COVID-19 spikes in November and December and adding that the availability of vaccines, thanks to the Trump and Biden administrations, is now “a real game changer” for schools reopening.

MacCallum countered that virus transmission rates among students in the classroom “was very low” even during the COVID-19 spikes.

“The bottom line, Martha, is it’s time for our kids to be back in school,” Weingarten responded. “I am grateful that the Biden administration is listening to parents and to teachers and to administrators and to even Fox to try to figure out how we get people vaccinated, how we get our kids back to school and how we get our country back to being back.”

Asked what needs to happen for schools to fully reopen in the fall, Weingarten said Fox News needs to tell its viewers that the vaccine is safe, implying that the network is responsible for spreading misinformation on vaccines.

“I would hope that Fox would do what everybody else in public health is doing, which is, ‘We have to get our kids vaccinated once the vaccination is ok,” Weingarten said, though earlier she said students would not be required to get a vaccine for schools to reopen. “I would hope Fox says to all of these people that don’t want the vaccines that think there’s a problem, ‘Why don’t you and I do things together to get our kids back to school.'”

“This is what we need to do,” she added. “We have to stop the misinformation, we have to stop the disinformation, we have to stop the chaos.”

Share
Categories
Andrew Cuomo Covid vaccine COVID-19 Intelwars Larry schwartz Letitia james New York

Cuomo investigation expanded to include top adviser who may have linked vaccines to political support for Cuomo: report

New York investigators have reportedly expanded their investigation into Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) to include whether a top COVID-19 adviser tied vaccine access to political support for the scandal-embattled governor.

New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) opened an investigation into Cuomo earlier this year after numerous women came forward with sexual harassment allegations. The scandal boiled over just Cuomo was taking heat from federal officials over his COVID-related nursing home scandal. The U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York is handing the nursing home investigation.

Cuomo is also being investigated over allegations “misused state resources to write and promote his pandemic book” about the pandemic, NBC News reported.

What are the details?

According to the Wall Street Journal, investigators have questioned at least three Democratic county executives “who said they were surprised to receive calls from Larry Schwartz,” Cuomo’s COVID vaccine czar who abruptly resigned from his position as a “volunteer adviser” last month.

More from Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Schwartz contacted more than a half-dozen executives in early March, executives said, as Mr. Cuomo faced mounting calls for his resignation from members of his own political party and was personally contacting state lawmakers to shore up support.

The executives said that at the time of Mr. Schwartz’s calls they were typically speaking with him about the allocation of vaccine supplies, not politics. Mr. Schwartz has said he didn’t link vaccine distribution to political considerations. On Friday, he referred questions to his lawyer, Guy Petrillo, who declined to comment.

At least one of the county executives filed a complaint with the state’s attorney general’s office after fielding a call from Schwartz, the Journal reported.

“Right at the time that every county was working, and desperately needed more vaccines, to receive a call from the person who was responsible for allocating those doses gauging political loyalty to the governor was an obvious conflict, and at best ethically gray,” one county executive told the Journal.

Erie County Executive Mark Poloncarz (D), meanwhile, told the Journal he did not feel Schwartz tried to pressure him into supporting Cuomo.

Why did Schwartz step down?

According to the New York Post, Schwartz stepped down after the New York State Legislature repealed a controversial rule that allowed some individuals to serve as volunteer officials during the pandemic.

The rule change, according to the New York Times, meant Schwartz would have been “treated as a public officer following the legislative changes, which would have required him to file financial disclosure forms and be subject to a two-year lobbying ban after his service to the state.”

Numerous staffers have resigned from Cuomo’s office in recent months as investigators continue their investigations into Cuomo. “Those include aides Max Orenstein, Laura Edidin, Christopher O’Brien, Caitlin Girouard, Eric Hammond, Will Burns, Kumiki Gibson and Gareth Rhodes. Most recently, Cuomo spokesman Jack Sterne left in mid-April, a year into serving in the communications department,” the Post reported.

Cuomo’s communications director, Peter Ajemian, is the latest to leave. His last day was Friday.

Share
Categories
CNN COVID-19 Energy policy gas prices Intelwars Jake Tapper Jennifer Granholm

Biden’s energy secretary blames COVID-19 for soaring gas prices, but oil industry expert points at Biden

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm is blaming the pandemic for soaring gas prices.

Since President Joe Biden took office on Jan. 20, the national average gas price has soared more than 50 cents. As of Friday, it stood at nearly $3 per gallon — $2.96. The average was $2.38 per gallon when Biden took office, and $2.11 per gallon on Election Day last year.

What did Granholm say?

CNN anchor Jake Tapper confronted Granholm on Friday about skyrocketing gas prices, asking the former Michigan Democratic governor whether high energy prices will slow down the post-pandemic economic recovery.

“Beyond whether or not you think your policies are to blame, are you worried that the prices could impact whether or not Americans travel, which is, of course, needed to put money back into the economy?” Tapper asked.

In response, Granholm suggested an out-of-control COVID-19 virus is to blame for higher prices at the pump.

“People need to travel, you’re right, but we need to get the virus under control first, we need to get to that 70%, we need to get to herd immunity,” Granholm replied.

“Why have gas prices gone up? Could that be because of the virus itself as well? Everything is tied together,” she added. “So I just want to say, this administration is totally focused on getting this virus under control, which means the economy will get under control, and then investing in the nation so that we can go big on America.”


Biden Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Has No Answer On Rising Gas Prices, Tries To Blame COVID-19

www.youtube.com

Ironically, Granholm’s remark about herd immunity comes after the New York Times published a story suggesting herd immunity in the U.S. is no longer probable.

What’s to blame?

While typical culprits such as refinery maintenance and converting to summertime blends are partly to blame for the surge in gas prices, oil expert David Blackmon recently explained in Forbes the Biden administration’s policies are also a major contributor.

“Since last November 3, the average price per gallon of regular gasoline in the U.S. has skyrocketed by 75 cents. The markets clearly see the Biden/Harris administration as one that will work to inhibit U.S. oil production, which will also have the effect of tightening the global market, and traders have responded by driving up the price of crude oil,” Blackmon wrote.

He explained:

President Biden’s Day 1 executive orders to cancel the cross-border permit for the Keystone XL pipeline and suspend the program for oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters were just initial shots across the bow. His order to raise the estimate for the “social cost of carbon” by over 700% will inevitably result in regulatory actions that will raise the cost of producing oil in the U.S., as will the coming effort by the Biden EPA to convince the courts to allow it to regulate carbon as a “criteria pollutant,” a topic I’ll address in more detail in the coming days.

All of these actions and more to come will increase the costs of not just oil and gasoline, but all forms of non-renewable energy for consumers, will make the country increasingly reliant on foreign oil imports and thus will render the country less energy secure than before. These outcomes are entirely predictable and are in fact features of the Biden/Harris plan, which is in part designed to make EVs and renewables more competitive by raising the cost of fossil fuels and other more traditional forms of energy. That’s not a value judgement: it’s just reality.

Share
Categories
CDC CNBC COVID-19 face masks Intelwars Scott Gottlieb

Former FDA chief says now is the time to begin lifting mask mandates: ‘As aggressively as we put them in’

Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, said this week that indoor mask mandates should begin to be lifted immediately, saying vaccine efficacy means the government should relax pandemic-related restrictions.

In fact, Gottlieb said Thursday that if the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not begin encouraging the lifting of mask mandates, they will quickly lose credibility.

“I think we should start lifting these restrictions as aggressively as we put them in,” Gottlieb told CNBC host Shepard Smith.

“We need to preserve the credibility of public health officials to perhaps reimplement some of these provisions as we get into next winter, if we do start seeing outbreaks again,” he continued. “And the only way to earn public credibility is to demonstrate you’re willing to relax these provisions when the situation improves. That’s what gives you the credibility to implement them when things worsen.”

Overall, Gottlieb predicted the COVID-19 situation in the U.S. will only continue to improve, yet another reason to relax or rescind mask mandates.

“Even if vaccination rates are slowing, we’re still going to continue to chip away at getting more people vaccinated,” he said, “but I think that these gains are locked in, and the summer looks very good.”

What is the CDC saying?

The CDC, under President Joe Biden’s leadership, does not agree with Gottlieb.

Despite finally updating mask guidance allowing fully vaccinated individuals to go outside without wearing a face mask under most circumstances, the CDC still says all people, regardless of their vaccine status, should wear a mask indoors.

Surprisingly, as vaccination rates slow because the people most enthusiastic about vaccines have already received their shots, the CDC and other public health officials who were aggressive with restrictions are not using mask mandate rescission as an incentive for more people to get vaccinated.

However, polling data suggest such incentives would work.

In one recent study, researchers discovered an overall increase of 13% in vaccine eagerness if it meant mask mandates become a thing of the past.

Share
Categories
6 feet COVID-19 experimental gene therapies Fear figure it out government is slavery Headline News Intelwars isolation LIES lockdown Masters panic plandemic public ruling class scamdemic slaves social distancing the masses time is running out Transmission Vaccination wake up

Not Giving Up: CDC Says COVID Spreads More Than 6 Feet

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is stopping at nothing to make sure people stay isolated from each other. Now, apparently, the smartest virus in history can infect people 6 feet apart, so we have to stay even farther away from others.

When will the public tire of these lies and bold agenda pushing? Probably never based on everything else they’ve been willing to subject themselves to.

Ruling Class: The Scamdemic Won’t End Until The WHOLE WORLD Is Vaccinated

The ruling class’s agency has allegedly “repeatedly documented” instances of coronavirus spreading through the air to people more than 6 feet away under certain conditions. “Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from inhalation of virus in the air farther than six feet from an infectious source can occur,” the new document says in large letters while noting it is “less likely than at closer distances.”

The risk of this kind of spread is highest indoors in places with “inadequate ventilation,” when people are shouting or singing, or when people are exposed for long periods of time, the CDC said.

Experts have also long said that being outdoors is far safer than being indoors. Yet last March, the rulers demanded we lock ourselves indoors in our homes for six weeks and allow our businesses to fail in epic numbers while still sat in lush mansions collecting paychecks off the backs of the slaves.

The CDC acknowledged in October that the virus can spread through airborne transmission, but there has since been a growing emphasis on that method of transmission. They can’t have us getting together and figuring things out, so the push to shove us further apart has begun.

The attempt to continually panic the public is obvious. The more they can get us to live in fear of each other, the more gene therapy shots they can get into arms. The good news is that they are running out of gullible sheep willing to take this thing.

After Running Out Of People Willing To Take The COVID Shot, Baltimore Resorts To Shaming

The post Not Giving Up: CDC Says COVID Spreads More Than 6 Feet first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
Albert Bourla Biontech blá COVID-19 Donald Trump Emergency use authorization FDA food and drug administration full approval Headline News Intelwars LIES mandates coming Military personnel Operation warp speed Pfizer plandemic public health emergency scamdemic wake up

Pfizer Will Seek FULL FDA Approval For The COVID-19 “Vaccine”

If Pfizer is successful, and the Food and Drug Administration gives them the approval to distribute the gene therapy falsely being a labeled a vaccine, the United States government could then mandate it for all military personnel who have, so far, been holdouts.

Have you ever wondered why the emergency pandemic declaration made by Donald Trump last March was never removed? It’s so they can “vaccinate” under emergency use authorization.  Once this gene therapy receives full FDA approval, anyone over 16 can be injected at any time. And Pfizer still won’t have any liability for any side effects, so it’s a massive win for them either way.

The companies announced they started their Biologics License Application (BLA) for the FDA to grant full authorization to give their vaccine to those 16 and older.

With the FDA’s full approval, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine could be given to patients after the public health emergency is declared over. -The Hill

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine would be the first COVID-19 gene therapy intentionally falsely labeled as a “vaccine” in the U.S. with the FDA’s full approval.

“We are proud of the tremendous progress we’ve made since December in delivering vaccines to millions of Americans, in collaboration with the U.S. Government,” Pfizer Chairman and CEO Albert Bourla said.  “We look forward to working with the FDA to complete this rolling submission and support their review, with the goal of securing full regulatory approval of the vaccine in the coming months,” he added.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

The companies’ two-shot mRNA vaccine was the first to receive the FDA’s emergency use authorization in the U.S. on Dec. 11, followed by the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine.  Since then, according to Pfizer and BioNTech, more than 170 million doses have been distributed across the country.

The companies are seeking full approval after 6 months of data following a second dose.

Stay alert and know what’s happening. Stay prepared. We know this “vaccine” is a piece of the overall agenda we just don’t know how much yet. We should be prepared for the FDA (government aka ruling class) to approve this for Big Pharma and mandates begin for the military. Things could really start to get interesting in the coming months unless people begin to figure some of this out.

Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY

The post Pfizer Will Seek FULL FDA Approval For The COVID-19 “Vaccine” first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
23 and me American DNA collection Anne Wojcicki bill gates Chiense China control Covid tests COVID-19 Critical Thinking Data DNA collection experimental Gates Foundation gene therapies Headline News Health Intelwars larger agenda medical misuse New World Order PCR tests philanthropy statisstics vaccines wake up Youtube

Bill Gates, China, 23andMe, And Your DNA

This article was originally published by Derrick Broze at The Last American Vagabond. 

EDITOR’S NOTE: *Whether you believe the “vaccine” is altering your genetic material or not, there is no denying at this point that our genetics have something to do with this overall agenda. The “vaccine” is playing a role in making the agenda a reality.

Is there a connection between China, Bill Gates, YouTube, and DNA collection?

Recent reports reveal that a Chinese company with connections to the Gates Foundation is involved in COVID-19 testing and poses a potential threat to American privacy, particularly the medical and health data of those who have been tested for COVID-19.

In late January, CBS’ 60 Minutes reported:

“60 Minutes has learned Chinese company BGI Group, the largest biotech firm in the world, offered to build COVID labs in at least six states, and U.S. intelligence officials issued warnings not to share health data with BGI. 

The largest biotech firm in the world wasted no time in offering to build and run COVID testing labs in Washington, contacting its governor right after the first major COVID outbreak in the U.S. occurred there. The Chinese company, the BGI Group, made the same offer to at least five other states, including New York and California, 60 Minutes has learned. This, along with other COVID testing offers by BGI, so worried Bill Evanina, then the country’s top counterintelligence officer, that he authorized a rare public warning.”

“Foreign powers can collect, store and exploit biometric information from COVID tests” declared the notice. Evanina believes the Chinese are trying to collect Americans’ DNA to win a race to control the world’s biodata.”

Evanina said a foreign entity could learn about a person’s current or future medical conditions by studying their DNA and using this information to gain a monopoly over necessary drugs and treatments.

BGI Group declined to be interviewed by 60 Minutes and said the idea that Americans genomic data has been compromised by BGI is “groundless”.

Concerns around BGI also arose in late January when Reuters reported that more than 40 publicly available documents and research papers show BGI’s links to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Reuters said the research dealt with topics as varied as mass testing for respiratory pathogens to brain science.

The Gates Foundation and BGI

In March, journalist Natalie Winter of National Pulse uncovered documentation of a relationship between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and BGI going back nearly a decade. Winter found a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Gates Foundation and BGI to “form a collaboration on global health and agricultural development with the goal of achieving common objectives in health and agricultural development.”

Specifically, this collaboration deals with developments in human, plant, and animal genomics, the study of DNA. In the press release for the MOU, the co-founder of BGI directly mentions the partnership as focused on genomics.

BGI looks forward to partnering with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in this significant collaboration to apply genomics research to benefit global human health,” said Dr. Huanming Yang, Chairman, and Co-Founder of BGI.

Bill Gates also visited BGI headquarters in 2010, according to a report from the Financial Times. The Times stated that BGI “is working towards a goal of building a huge library based on the DNA of many millions of people.” BGI’s goal is to use this information for new drugs, genetic research, and “transforming public health policy”.

It would appear the COVID-19 crisis has helped BGI and the Gates Foundation step into the role of influencing and transforming international health policy.

Winter’s report also notes that:

the Gates Foundation has also funded BGI projects relating to genome sequencing alongside Chinese Communist Party bodies such as the Ministry of Science and Technology and Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Similarly, Dr. Tadataka Yamada, the former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.”

It’s clear that BGI Group and the Gates Foundation have a documented relationship over the last decade. It’s equally apparent that BGI Group has an extensive relationship with the Chinese military and government. It is these connections – the relationship that exists between the Chinese government, the BGI Group, and the Gates Foundation – which has sparked fears regarding the potential misuse of the COVID-19 tests manufactured by BGI.

BGI and the DNA Testing Industry

Since March 2020, BGI has sold millions of its COVID-19 test kits around the world, including the United States, Europe, and Australia. Reuters reports that shares of BGI Genomics Co. have doubled in the last year, giving BGI a market value of around $9 billion USD.

The company is based in Shenzhen, on the coast of Guangdong, China. They have made a name for themselves by selling genetic sequencing services around the world, which has helped them to create a large database of DNA. BGI is also well known for creating a cloned pig in 2010.

The company has regularly partnered with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. BGI and the PLA’s Academy of Military Medical Science share a dozen patents for DNA tests. Coincidentally, Reuters notes that one patent from 2015 is for a “low-cost test kit to detect respiratory pathogens, including SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and coronaviruses.”

Further, Chen Weijun, BGI’s chief infectious disease expert, is listed as an inventor on the patent while also holding the title of one of the first scientists reported to have sequenced COVID-19 used samples from a military hospital in Wuhan.

BGI says the test kit developed with the Chinese military is not the same one sold to foreign countries.

The danger of COVID-19 tests being used as a method for gathering genomic data on the unsuspecting public is part of a larger conversation about the dangers posed by genealogy companies generally. Millions of people around the world have voluntarily submitted their DNA in exchange for information about their ancestry. The vast majority of the users of these companies, such as Ancestry and 23andMe, do not read the Terms of Service which outline how the genealogy firms can use the data.

One of the ways this data is used is to sell it to biotech companies that are interested in developing new drugs and therapies. Clearly, there are governments and militaries who also have an interest in collecting this data.

Evanina, the former counterintelligence officer, told 60 Minutes that Chinese companies are investing in U.S. biotech companies to gain access to the health data. He says most people do not realize that their genetic material represents “your past and your future as well as your children’s future.”

While there are clear reasons to be concerned about the influence of the Chinese government and what they might do with your DNA, the reality is most governments with the resources will likely seek to mine DNA as well. This absolutely includes the United States government, military, and private companies.

One such company is the aforementioned 23andMe. In the January 60 Minutes report Anne Wojcicki, CEO of 23andMe, answered questions regarding her company’s use of the data they are collecting. While Wojcicki says that her company has “empowered individuals with this opportunity to come together, to crowdsource research”, she doesn’t shy away from acknowledging that her company plans to use the information to develop drugs.

“And I absolutely stand behind: we are going to develop drugs. So that everyone is actually benefiting from the human genome. So absolutely the data is valuable,” Wojcicki told 60 Minutes.

While she says she agrees that Americans should be concerned about China’s investments in genomic research, she believes the answer is for the United States to invest in genetic programs.

Wojcicki and 23andMe have faced their own criticisms regarding how they use the data and whether the public can truly expect records of their DNA to be safe. In February it was announced 23andMe would become a publicly-traded company with help from billionaire Richard Branson. The Guardian noted that Branson’s Virgin Acquisition Group said 23andMe and their “vast proprietary dataset” of DNA would allow Virgin to “unlock revenue streams across digital health, therapeutics, and more”.

Branson’s interest in the study of DNA resembles the interests of wannabe billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein had an obsession with funding DNA programs. Bill Gates is also a part of this web because of his relationship with Epstein and partnership with the BGI Group. TLAV’s Whitney Webb recently reported:

Epstein donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the institution and Epstein was also used as a channel for making donations to MIT by billionaire Bill Gates. Gates has yet to explain why he would funnel his donations through Epstein as opposed to publicly donating via his well-known “philanthropic” foundation. Epstein’s funding of the MIT Media Lab in particular led to the resignation of its former director Joi Ito in September 2019 following Epstein’s arrest and subsequent ‘suicide.’”

The DNA-Biosecurity-Big Tech Web

What is not mentioned in the 60 Minutes piece – or anywhere else – is the fact that Anne Wojcicki, CEO of 23andMe, is the sister of Susan Wojcicki, CEO of YouTube.  Additionally, Anne Wojcicki’s husband until 2015 was Sergey Brin, one of the founders of Google and president of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc, until December 2019. Google also owns YouTube.

The reason these connections matter is because there are common threads between Google, the Gates Foundation, companies like 23andMe, and the Chinese government. While Anne Wojcicki and 23andMe work on DNA mining, her sister at YouTube censors reports on such topics that are often labeled misinformation. Understanding the incredible conflicts of interest here is of the utmost importance.

In a coming report, I will dive deeper into this tangled web of Big Tech, Big Philanthropy, and the Chinese government.

The post Bill Gates, China, 23andMe, And Your DNA first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
Americans central banking Corn COVID-19 disposable income economic collapse Food food prices Headline News Hunger Income inflation Intelwars money prices surge Statistics

What Will You Do When Inflation Forces U.S. Households To Spend 40 Percent Of Their Incomes On Food?

This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. 

Did you know that the price of corn has risen 142 percent in the last 12 months?  Of course, corn is used in hundreds of different products we buy at the grocery store, and so everyone is going to feel the pain of this price increase.  But it isn’t just the price of corn that is going crazy.

We are seeing food prices shoot up dramatically all across the industry, and experts are warning that this is just the very beginning.  So if you think that food prices are bad now, just wait, because they are going to get a whole lot worse.

Typically, Americans spend approximately 10 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food.  The following comes directly from the USDA website

In 2019, Americans spent an average of 9.5 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food—divided between food at home (4.9 percent) and food away from home (4.6 percent). Between 1960 and 1998, the average share of disposable personal income spent on total food by Americans, on average, fell from 17.0 to 10.1 percent, driven by a declining share of income spent on food at home.

Needless to say, the poorest Americans spend more of their incomes on food than the richest Americans.

According to the USDA, the poorest households spent an average of 36 percent of their disposable personal incomes on food in 2019…

As their incomes rise, households spend more money on food, but it represents a smaller overall budget share. In 2019, households in the lowest income quintile spent an average of $4,400 on food (representing 36.0 percent of income), while households in the highest income quintile spent an average of $13,987 on food (representing 8.0 percent of income).

Needless to say, the final numbers for 2020 will be quite a bit higher, and many believe that eventually the percentage of disposable personal income that the average U.S. household spends on food will reach 40 percent.

That would mean that many poor households would end up spending well over 50 percent of their personal disposable incomes just on food.

At one time that would have been unimaginable, but now everything is changing.  As I noted above, the price of corn his increased 142 percent since this time last year…

Corn prices have jumped roughly 142% over the past year to $7.56 per bushel, the highest price seen in eight years for the crop.

A drought in Brazil and increased demand in China have put pressure on global suppliers.

In other areas we are seeing more moderate inflation, but overall we just witnessed the largest increase in food inflation “in almost nine years”

The average prices in March of 2021 for pork chops and chicken breasts are both up more than 10% compared to March of 2020. Eggs and cheddar cheese are both up 6%.

Looking at all consumer goods as a whole, the latest inflation data in the Consumer Price Index from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the largest month-to-month increase in almost nine years.

Meanwhile, the price of lumber just continues to shoot even higher.

In New Jersey, one man says that the total cost of lumber used in building his new home will reach $70,000

Tom McCarthy can’t finish building a home in Bergen County, New Jersey because of the lumber shortage.

“There are pieces of wood that we can’t find,” said McCarthy, a real estate broker with the Chen Agency who also builds homes with his father on the side.

McCarthy estimates the cost of lumber for the home will hit $70,000, nearly double the cost of building the exact same home in a nearby town just eight months ago.

Isn’t that nuts?

Instead of building a new home, you could try buying an existing one instead, but real estate prices in many areas have gotten completely insane.

In northern California, one house recently sold for more than a million dollars over listing price

When a house in Berkeley sold for more than $1 million over its list price in late March 2021, it was covered in media outlets across the Bay Area, including this one.

While the Berkeley sale was particularly sensational — it sold for double its list price and received 29 offers — these individual stories are becoming more common in today’s real estate market, according to recent data and anecdotes from real estate professionals.

I never imagined that I would see such a thing happen.

But one real estate agent says that such wild bidding wars are becoming increasingly common

And that’s especially true in the East Bay. “People are not surprised when a home goes $1 million over,” said Josh Dickinson, the founder of real estate agency Zip Code East Bay. “When my clients see a house for $1.9 million they’re almost conditioned to think it’ll go over $3 million in Piedmont or North Berkeley.”

This is what the beginning stages of hyperinflation look like, but Federal Reserve officials insist that we have nothing to be concerned about.

In fact, Eric Rosengren just told the press that the crazy inflation we are seeing now “is likely to prove temporary”

Boston Federal Reserve President Eric Rosengren in an interview with MarketWatch on Wednesday dismissed talk of scaling back asset purchases as premature, and said temporary factors pushing up inflation this spring won’t last.

“My view is that this acceleration in the rate of price increases is likely to prove temporary,” Rosengren said Wednesday.

Do you believe him?

I don’t.

As Simon Black has pointed out, the federal government is just going to continue to borrow and spend trillions upon trillions of dollars…

This is the big one. The US federal government is hoping to spend a whopping $11 TRILLION this year, between the regular budget, COVID stimulus already passed, and all the new legislation they’re proposing.

And it’s only May.

Obviously Uncle Sam doesn’t have the money. So they have to borrow it.

Almost everybody loved it when the federal government started sending out big, fat stimulus checks.

But you aren’t going to love it when a cart of food costs you $400 at the grocery store.

Whenever the government hands out “free money”, someone has got to pay for it, and one way we are paying for it is through higher prices.

If you do not believe that this is a major national crisis yet, you will soon, because it won’t be too long before most of the country is loudly complaining about how nightmarish inflation has become.

***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***

About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com.  In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The EndGet Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned)  By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe.  I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream, and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe.  I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article.  The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial, or health decisions.  I encourage you to follow me on social media on FacebookTwitter, and Parler, and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help.  During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.

The post What Will You Do When Inflation Forces U.S. Households To Spend 40 Percent Of Their Incomes On Food? first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
COVID-19 Donald Trump experimental gene therapies Headline News Hoax Intelwars Ivanka Trump Joy Behar LIES Obey Operation warp speed plandemic ruling class scamdemic Statistics submission Vaccine wak up

Ivanka Trump Helps Push The Official Narrative: Get The “Vaccine!”

Ivanka Trump is helping the push to get as many people injected as possible with the experimental gene therapies they are calling “vaccines.” Trump touted the COVID-19 vaccine in a social media post celebrating her second dose, and once again urged her followers to get vaccinated.

The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Her father, former President Donald Trump initiated Operation Warp Speed and has also been trying to push his followers into taking the gene therapy shot.

Trump Does Fauci’s Bidding & Urges Americans To Get Vaccinated: “I Would Recommend It”

Ms. Trump’s posts come a few months after she told “The View” co-host Joy Behar in September that she would get the vaccine once it was available to her. Obviously, this is nothing more or less than a propaganda push for the “vaccines.”

To date, more than 105 million people have gotten their second doses in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine tracker. Obviously, based on how much we know they lied with their statistics about this scamdemic, to begin with, perhaps those numbers are dramatically off too.

Another COVID-19 Whistleblower: A Montana Dr. Says Government Is Drastically Overstating Deaths

When it comes to this “vaccine” people seem to be split more than the polling or mainstream media is willing to suggest. There are those who have already gleefully and willingly signed up to be injected with this experimental technology, and there are those who will not take ever regardless of the oppression and tyranny they will be subjected to for refusing.

With the goal of helping you all enhance your critical thinking skills, read the following article and the reasons (if they can even be reasons, it’s more of one guy just giving an answer you’re expected to believe without evidence because he “repeated” it often) that this is not gene therapy, but actually a vaccine. If you want a good starting place, look at how he describes the difference between RNA and DNA, and the research the difference.

Forbes article: Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines Are Not ‘Gene Therapy,’ As Some Are Claiming

Research and ask the questions, because the guy who wrote the above article is hoping you won’t. I am no scientist, but I do attempt to think things through, and based on the “evidence” he gives, I would say this is gene therapy. If you research and come to the conclusion that this is a “vaccine,” that’s fine too. Just use your critical thinking skills to do so, because that’s the one thing that panics the elitists the most.

Wake up, folks. Do everything you can to stay alert and prepared for anything. They will stoop to all-time lows to get people to take this shot.  It’s a piece of their agenda and to what extent, we will have to wait to find out.

The post Ivanka Trump Helps Push The Official Narrative: Get The “Vaccine!” first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
brainwashing CDC comply control COVID-19 Critical Thinking Dr. Rochelle Walensky experimental gene therapy Headline News Hoax Intelwars jab LIES Mainstream media modeling not a study Obey plandemic power puppets ruling class scamdemic scenarios Shots Social Engineering vaccines wake up

CDC Projects A “Sharp Decline” In COVID Cases While Calling Variants A “Wild Card”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States says that there will be a shape decline in COVID cases as long as people continue to take the experimental gene therapy shots.  But they also said the new variants are a “wild card.”

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

According to the ruling class and their mainstream media puppets, if fewer people follow Covid-19 precautions such as wearing masks and physical distancing, it could undermine the gains from vaccinations to slow the spread of the coronavirus in the United States, according to the study published by and funded by the ruling class (the CDC).

Again use your critical thinking. Does that statement make any logical sense? If vaccines (which are actually experimental gene therapy) work, then what’s the point of masking and social distancing. If those things work, why do we need vaccines too? If all of them work, why are there still COVID cases? Again, continue to ask the hard questions that no one else seems logical enough to pose.

The longer this scam goes on, the less logical sense it makes.

“High vaccination rates and compliance with public health prevention measures are essential to control the COVID-19 pandemic and to prevent surges in hospitalizations and deaths in the coming months,” the authors of a study wrote.

“Nationally, reported cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are now decreasing or stable,” the researchers added. “However, transmission remains widespread and increased cases, hospitalizations, and deaths continue to be reported in some jurisdictions and, as this study indicates, the potential for future increases persists.” –CNN

The study makes clear that the sooner the US gets more people vaccinated, the sooner the nation could return to normal — but coronavirus variants are a “wild card,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a White House briefing Wednesday.

Does anyone remember Walensky:

“Right Now I’m Scared” – CDC Director Chokes Back Tears As She Fearmongers “Impending Doom”

Of course, that’s what a study funded and published by the rulers will find. It’s going to fit the official narrative or it won’t be put out in the form of brainwashing propaganda. And guess how the “study” arrived at their conclusions? Modeling. Gee, where have we seen that before?

Oh, that’s right:

Shocking New Study Concludes That The “Best Case Scenario” For A COVID-19 Pandemic Is 15 Million Dead

You would think they would be tired of lying and panicking people, and yet the hoax goes on.

“The models give us an important reminder. They project that local conditions and emerging variants are putting many states at risk for increases in Covid-19 cases, especially if we do not increase the rate of vaccinations and if we do not keep our current mitigation strategies in place until we have a critical mass of people vaccinated,” Walensky said.So, again, this “study” was actually “modeling” and not really a study. It’s fascinating how they are doing this now and it’s also alarming that many can’t see through the facade still.

The post CDC Projects A “Sharp Decline” In COVID Cases While Calling Variants A “Wild Card” first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
Americans authoritarianism concerned Coronavirus COVID-19 Critical Thinking distribution Dr. anthony fauci experimental gene therapies government is slavery Headline News Humanity illogical Intelwars liars obedient submission Polling ruling class running out of people shaming tyrannical totalitarianism unvaccinated vaccinated wake up

Pro-Vaxxers Are “Concerned” The Some Won’t Take The Vaccine

In what has to be the most illogical thought process known to mankind, over half of Americans are “concerned” that some others are refusing to take the vaccine. Vaccine believers are so into this new religion that they are overly concerned about what others do, or do not do.

The main question no pro-vaccine advocate can answer, is if your vaccine works (and that’s why you go it right?) then why does someone else have to be vaccinated? Are you saying it doesn’t work? Probably, because Fauci even said it doesn’t work. Probably because it’s not a vaccine anyway. That’s evidenced by the rulers constantly telling people it won’t stop you from getting COVID, it’ll “lessen the symptoms.” And even then, if you believe it works to do that, why not just let the people who won’t get it suffer and we can compare down the road which ones made the right choice during this gigantic medical experiment of all of humanity?

In a new poll, it has become all too obvious that humans are willing to suspend their logical and critical thinking in exchange for blind obedience to their master.

New polling shows just how many Americans are willing to suspend critical thinking in exchange for obedient submission. Three times more concerned with people in their areas not getting vaccinated against Covid-19 than they are with the availability or distribution of the jabs.

After Running Out Of People Willing To Take The COVID Shot, Baltimore Resorts To Shaming

The main concern among Americans appears to be vaccine hesitancy from their fellow citizens. While over half of American adults have received at least one dose of a vaccine, 55% of those surveyed said they are concerned about people in their local areas choosing not to get vaccinated. Among that group, 28% are “very” worried and 27% aremoderately” worried. Another 16% said they are “not too” worried, while 30% are not concerned. -RT

It still is confusing how the unvaccinated are a threat to the vaccinated if vaccines work. The whole point is to create an immune response so when the virus is introduced, there will be no illness. If that’s the whole idea behind vaccines, why anyone would care is beyond logic. No “authority” or doctor has ever been able to come up with an explanation as to why this phenomenon of thought that goes: “my vaccine won’t work unless you get a vaccine that doesn’t work too.”

Critical thinking and discernment are going to be skills that are rare in the coming years. Hone them, and refuse to give up your free will. Ask the questions others refuse to ask because we could see something coming as the ruling class runs out of people willing to take this jab.

New Poll: U.S. Is Running Out Of Adults “Willing To Be Vaccinated”

Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY

“Now we’re going to have to bring the vaccine to people who are less eager,” Biden said Tuesday. “So we also know that there are millions of Americans who just need a little bit of encouragement to get the shot.”

Who knows what that “encouragement” will look like. Personally, I expect it to look like tyrannical totalitarian enslavement.

The post Pro-Vaxxers Are “Concerned” The Some Won’t Take The Vaccine first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share
Categories
agenda Albert Bourla Biden administration booster shots CEO COVID-19 demands Earnings elitists Emergency use authorization experimental gene therapies government is slavery governments Headline News Hoax injections Intelwars LIES lipid nanoparticle technology minors money stream New World Order not approved official narrative Pfizer plandemic ruling class scamdemic Shots third shots United States Vaccinations wake up wealth transfer World

Pfizer Expects Vaccine Will Be “Durable Revenue Stream” As It Seeks Approval For Children 2 To 11

This article was originally published by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge. 

Yesterday, Pfizer released a strong earnings report (surpassing Wall Street’s elevated projections), and also revealed that it’s both on the cusp of securing regulatory approval in the US for minors between the ages of 12 and 15 to receive the vaccine (setting off another wave of demand as the Biden Administration heaps pressure on states to get their vaccination numbers up).

During a call with analysts and reporters, CEO Albert Bourla revealed that Pfizer is in talks with “basically all the governments of the world” about providing shots and booster shots through 2024.

The key number is that Pfizer expects sales of its coronavirus jab to hit $26 billion by the end of this year, a milestone that would make the vaccine the company’s biggest-selling pharmaceutical product, eclipsing Humira, the popular rheumatoid arthritis drug made by Abbvie. Also, Pfizer said it intends to use its mRNA technology underpinning its COVID-19 jab for other therapies and vaccines. For example, the company is working on creating seasonal flu shots using the same RNA lipid nanoparticle technology.

Bourla has already primed the public to expect to receive at least one additional shot within a year of their second dose, while also teasing the likelihood that the world might require annual booster shots – something that would be a boon to Pfizer’s bottom line as it moves to grow its COVID-19 vaccine division into a major, and permanent, line of business.

To help make its product more durable (and thus increase demand in poorer countries) the company said it is studying whether doses ould be stored at standard refrigerator temperatures.

Regardless, Bourla expects “durable demand” for vaccnes, similar to the flu vaccine.

“It is our hope that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine will continue to have a global impact by helping to get the devastating pandemic under control and helping economies around the world not only open, but stay open,” Bourla said in prepared remarks.

That’s bad news for the rag-tag band of emerging-market economies pushing a proposal at the WTO to waive IP rights when it comes to vaccine technology. If Washington were to back such a move, it would supercharge the “open vaccine” movement, and represent a major threat to Pfizer’s latest profit stream. That effort is being led by India and South Africa, yet Bill Gates and Washington lobbyists have continued to insist that respecting IP and letting Big Pharma handle global distribution (as Covax dramatically lags expectations), which means the status quo is likely safe.

Even as WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus decries a “shocking imbalance in the global distribution of vaccines” and calls for more efforts to fortify the WHO’s Covax programs and speed up delivery to poorer nations, Pfizer appears to be more focused on building out its latest profit stream.

President Biden said Tuesday that while he had yet to make a decision on whether to support a vaccine waiver, the US was already moving “as quickly as we can” to export doses.

Pfizer’s earnings were so strong, they helped lift shares of vaccine makers on the other side of the world. Shares of some Asian vaccine makers with deals to distribute Pfizer’s jabs on the Continent rallied in sympathy with Pfizer. India’s Pfizer Ltd., a unit of Pfizer, rallied 4.9%, on Wednesday while Dr. Reddy’s and Cadila Healthcare rallied as much as 2.7% and 5.9%.

Looking ahead, CNN reported Wednesday that the FDA will approve the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID jab for use in 12 to 15-year-olds as early as next week. Data released by Pfizer recently purported to show that the jab is 100% effective at preventing serious symptoms. According to recent media reports, Pfizer is also seeking approval for the vaccine to be used on children as young as 2 and as old as 11 in both the US and Europe, an authorization it expects to arrive in September.

The post Pfizer Expects Vaccine Will Be “Durable Revenue Stream” As It Seeks Approval For Children 2 To 11 first appeared on SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You.

Share