http://anexconsview.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/real-or-fake/

Here is my latest video/blurb.

Feel free to post on your website if you want.

http://www.bestvancouverguide.com/main-and-hastings-best-place-to-see-crackheads-and-junkies-in-vancouver/66/

Mic check, Mic check
Thank you Dr. Paul
Thank you for opposing the indefinate detention of Americans
Thank you for opposing bailouts for Wall Street Billionaires
Thank you for opposing unnecessary wars
Thank you for standing up against corporatism
and cronyism
Thank you for fighting to stop 
the private bank the federal resevere
from stealing the wealth of the many
while enriching the few
Thank you for fighting for our liberties
Thank you for caring about the 99%
We love you Dr. Paul
Let’s hear it for Ron Paul!

No one says that a 100% Asian neighborhood needs more diversity.

No one says that a 100% Muslim neighborhood needs more diversity.

According to anti-Whites, they are already 100% diverse.

All White neighborhoods and only White neighborhoods need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no White people left in them.

Anti-racist is a codeword people HIDE BEHIND to be anti-White.

I FIND THIS BEYOND DISGUSTING. these charedim should be locked up and the key should be
thrown away. They need psychiatric help. Hitler and today’s neo-nazis gain in
stature when pictures of these insane idiots are seen througthout the world.

I FIND THIS BEYOND DISGUSTING. rabbi dr. bernhard rosenberg

http://www.datapoke.org/blog/8/study-modeling-fukushima-npp-radioactive-contamination-dispersion-utilizing-chino-m-et-al-source-terms/

http://www.datapoke.org/partmom/a=40

I’ve suspected for some time that the publicly
released emissions data had been manipulated – If the models are correct I
suppose this re enforces my hunch.  Is there anyone here that can help us
explain the implications of this model?

Right To Travel Freely in their own Country?

The
U.S. can’t become a Police State until the 4th Amendment is either

eliminated
or so watered down it has no legal effect.

TSA
recently refused to provide comprehensive information regarding test results
concerning TSA backscatter and other x-ray scanners at airports that might
determine if (frequent flyers) could be physically harmed, sustain organ damage
from repeated X-Ray scans.

TSA is now moving forward to
establish thousands of Check Points at surface transportation locations. One
can’t help recall at similar Check Points the Nazi Military and Police
constantly harassed, searched and delayed German travelers, especially persons
deemed politically undesirable at roadway checkpoints, when boarding trains and
at bus stops. Some Germans were stopped and delay daily, many lost their jobs
because they were late or missed work. Germans without probable cause were put
on (Nazi do not hire lists) similar to the lists started in 2010 by U.S.
Homeland Security. One must wonder if today’s outspoken Americans that defend
the Constitution, e.g., writers and Bloggers might later be deemed
“Belligerents” by U.S. Government and constantly stopped, searched, questioned
at checkpoints without cause or warrants; forced to endure X-ray scans damaging
their health and or Indefinitely Detained. It is foreseeable Americans could be
intimidated from traveling by TSA.

Currently one can only guess how much radiation is
covertly being transmitted by U.S. Government and police into the bodies of
“Persons of Interests” repeatedly scanned” without warrants, x-rayed on the
street, in their vehicles, inside their homes. The Obama
government ordered 500 backscatter X-ray vans that U.S. Government and local
Police will without public oversight or warrants to scan private homes—vehicles,
Citizens walking, riding a bicycle, standing someplace. Corrupt government and
police can too easily over X-RAY Citizens they deem undesirable.

I just stumbled upon this
study detailing high altitude radioactive contamination from Fukushima.  It uses TEPCO and MEXT
emission data to develop dispersion models of the radiation.  If the
models are correct the concentrations of contamination at upper altitudes are
orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations at near ground levels.

http://www.datapoke.org/blog/8/study-modeling-fukushima-npp-radioactive-contamination-dispersion-utilizing-chino-m-et-al-source-terms/

It is problematic U.S. Government in the future will want
to expand the scoop of Section 1021 in the passed Defense Authorization Act of
2012 (to include as “covered persons” for Indefinite Detention, not only
persons “suspected of substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban; or
their associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its
coalition partners” (but add to the list of “covered persons” (other) alleged
terrorists and organizations foreign or domestic. Currently what constitutes
(1) a terrorist act, (2) supporting terrorists or (3) being a “Belligerent” is
broadly vague and not clearly defined? For example, Americans attending a protest
demonstration against a U.S. Policy or U.S. Military Action could be charged
with all (three) under the Patriot Act and The Defense Authorization Act of
2012.

Provisions in The Defense Authorization Act of 2012 govern
the “Authority of the President and Armed Forces to Detain (Covered Persons)
without trial pursuant to the (AUMF) Authorization for Use of Military Force.

FYI: Glenn Greenwald recently wrote an article titled
“Three myths about the detention bill” that deeply examine provisions of The Defense
Authorization Act including wording that is broadly vague, that potentially
could cause the indefinite incarceration of Americans without trial; and
conflicting definitions of “Covered Persons” in provisions  (A) & (B) of section 1021. You may read
Glen Greenwald’s article at: 

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/singleton/

Is The Passed Defense Authorization Act of 2012
(retroactive) To Detain Americans?

The Defense Authorization Act of 2012) appears more
threatening to Americans than Hitler’s (1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS. Hitler’s laws
set time limits that Germans could be incarcerated for e.g., Serious
Disturbance of the Peace and Rioting. But Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s
bill broadly mandates holding Americans indefinitely in Military Custody for
being a “Belligerent.”

Why should anyone be surprised President Obama insisted on
indefinite detentions of U.S. Citizens in The Defense Authorization Act? It was
widely known that Obama gave a speech in May 2010 at a Security Conference that
proposed, incarcerating anyone in indefinite detention without evidence of
wrongdoing that government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage or support
a violent act in the future; including U.S. Citizens.

Now that Obama has signed The National Defense
Authorization Act of 2012, Obama like Hitler, will have the power to arrest
members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to
be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s premise someone is a
“Combatant” or Belligerent” having or likely to engage in or support a violent
act in the future or do something that (might) threaten National Security.

Now that Obama signed the National Defense Authorization
Act of 2012, could millions of lawful U.S. activists be subject to indefinite
military detention. When you examine Obama’s May 2010 speech, it appears Obama
wanted (retroactive power) to incarcerate anyone that government alleged had
(prior) committed or supported violent acts on the premise he or she is likely
to engage in or support violent acts in the future: some U.S. activists may be
vulnerable because no activist knows what other activists or groups they
associated or networked did in the past or might do illegally in the future
domestically or overseas. U.S. Government need (only allege) a person; group,
organization current or former inmate—has committed or might commit a violent
act or threaten U.S. National Security to order Indefinite Detention of
Americans in military custody with no evidence whatsoever.

Historically when countries have passed police state laws
like S.1867, many Citizens abstain from politically speaking out; visiting
activists websites or writing comments that might be deemed inappropriate by
the Government, i.e. cause someone to be investigated or detained in Military
Custody. Are some writers dead-meat with Obama’s signing of S. 1867?    It is foreseeable any “American” who
writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against any entity of
U.S. Government or its coalition partners may under the Patriot Act and The
Defense Authorization Act of 2012 be deemed by U.S. authorities a “Combatant or
Belligerent” or someone likely to engage in, support or provoke violent acts or
threaten National Security. U.S. Government can too easily allege an author’s
writings inspired Combatant(s) or Belligerent(s) in the past; could in the
future or currently, to order an author’s indefinite military detention.

It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens
not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or
allowed legal counsel that are interrogated, will be prosecuted for
non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while
held in Indefinite Military Detention. Obama will have the power to override
the U.S. Constitution. Obama will have the power to detain indefinitely any
American without probable cause or evidence. What American will dare speak out
against the U.S. government now that Obama has signed The Defense Authorization
Act of 2012.

Obama appears to be centralizing the power of federal
Government, by getting legislation passed that U.S. government can potentially
use to intimidate and threaten any individual or corporation. Hitler got passed
similar laws shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building
blamed on the communists: immediately after the fire, Hitler used his prior
passed police-state laws to coerce corporations and influential Citizens to
support passage of fascist legislation e.g., the (1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS /
DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE that
suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens’
freedoms and civil liberties. Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s (Defense
Authorization Act of 2012) appears more threatening to Americans than Hitler’
(1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS. Hitler’s laws set time limits that Germans could be
incarcerated for e.g., Serious Disturbance of the Peace and Rioting. But
Senators Carl Levin (D) and John McCain’s ® bill broadly mandates holding
Americans indefinitely in Military Custody for being a Combatant or
Belligerent. A U.S. Police State Government can use The Defense Authorization
Act; and Patriot Act that includes more than 350 civil asset forfeiture laws to
threaten or seize the assets of any corporation or individual; to strong-arm
U.S. corporations, institutions and others to support government actions
including passage of more Police State (Fascist) legislation that will intimidate,
threaten and curtail the civil liberties of Americans.

Immediately Below: compare The 1933 Nazi Decrees with
Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s National Defense Authorization Act of
2012.

1933. ROBL. I 83.

DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE
PEOPLE AND STATE

Note: Based on translations by State Department, National
Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler
Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the
following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence,
endangering the state:

Section 1

Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the
Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus,
restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion,
including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of
association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and
telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for
confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond
the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

Section 2

If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of
public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily
take over the powers of the highest state authority.

Section 4

Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the
disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the
authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders
given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as
the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with
imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000
Reichsmarks.

Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to
be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with
imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death
of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary
sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include
confiscation of property.

Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public
welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating
circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

Section 5

The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable
with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81
(high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods),
315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).

Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been
previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life
imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a
member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or
provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer,
or conspires with another for such a murder;

2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code
(serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious
disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously
and intentionally with an armed person;

3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the
Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage
in the political struggle.

Section 6

This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

Reich President

Reich Chancellor

Reich Minister of the Interior

Reich Minister of
Justice

It is problematic U.S. Government in the future will want to expand the scoop of Section 1021 in the passed Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (to include as “covered persons” for Indefinite Detention, not only persons “suspected of substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban; or their associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners” (but add to the list of “covered persons” (other) alleged terrorists and organizations foreign or domestic. Currently what constitutes (1) a terrorist act, (2) supporting terrorists or (3) being a “Belligerent” is broadly vague and not clearly defined? For example, Americans attending a protest demonstration against a U.S. Policy or U.S. Military Action could be charged with all (three) under the Patriot Act and The Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

Provisions in The Defense Authorization Act of 2012 govern the “Authority of the President and Armed Forces to Detain (Covered Persons) without trial pursuant to the (AUMF) Authorization for Use of Military Force.

FYI: Glenn Greenwald recently wrote an article titled “Three myths about the detention bill” that deeply examine provisions of The Defense Authorization Act including wording that is broadly vague, that potentially could cause the indefinite incarceration of Americans without trial; and conflicting definitions of “Covered Persons” in provisions  (A) & (B) of section 1021. You may read Glen Greenwald’s article at:  http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/singleton/

Is The Passed Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (retroactive) To Detain Americans?

The Defense Authorization Act of 2012) appears more threatening to Americans than Hitler’s (1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS. Hitler’s laws set time limits that Germans could be incarcerated for e.g., Serious Disturbance of the Peace and Rioting. But Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s bill broadly mandates holding Americans indefinitely in Military Custody for being a “Belligerent.”

Why should anyone be surprised President Obama insisted on indefinite detentions of U.S. Citizens in The Defense Authorization Act? It was widely known that Obama gave a speech in May 2010 at a Security Conference that proposed, incarcerating anyone in indefinite detention without evidence of wrongdoing that government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage or support a violent act in the future; including U.S. Citizens.

Now that Obama has signed The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Obama like Hitler, will have the power to arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s premise someone is a “Combatant” or Belligerent” having or likely to engage in or support a violent act in the future or do something that (might) threaten National Security.

Now that Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, could millions of lawful U.S. activists be subject to indefinite military detention. When you examine Obama’s May 2010 speech, it appears Obama wanted (retroactive power) to incarcerate anyone that government alleged had (prior) committed or supported violent acts on the premise he or she is likely to engage in or support violent acts in the future: some U.S. activists may be vulnerable because no activist knows what other activists or groups they associated or networked did in the past or might do illegally in the future domestically or overseas. U.S. Government need (only allege) a person; group, organization current or former inmate—has committed or might commit a violent act or threaten U.S. National Security to order Indefinite Detention of Americans in military custody with no evidence whatsoever.

Historically when countries have passed police state laws like S.1867, many Citizens abstain from politically speaking out; visiting activists websites or writing comments that might be deemed inappropriate by the Government, i.e. cause someone to be investigated or detained in Military Custody. Are some writers dead-meat with Obama’s signing of S. 1867?    It is foreseeable any “American” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against any entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners may under the Patriot Act and The Defense Authorization Act of 2012 be deemed by U.S. authorities a “Combatant or Belligerent” or someone likely to engage in, support or provoke violent acts or threaten National Security. U.S. Government can too easily allege an author’s writings inspired Combatant(s) or Belligerent(s) in the past; could in the future or currently, to order an author’s indefinite military detention.

It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel that are interrogated, will be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Military Detention. Obama will have the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama will have the power to detain indefinitely any American without probable cause or evidence. What American will dare speak out against the U.S. government now that Obama has signed The Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

Obama appears to be centralizing the power of federal Government, by getting legislation passed that U.S. government can potentially use to intimidate and threaten any individual or corporation. Hitler got passed similar laws shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building blamed on the communists: immediately after the fire, Hitler used his prior passed police-state laws to coerce corporations and influential Citizens to support passage of fascist legislation e.g., the (1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS / DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE that suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens’ freedoms and civil liberties. Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s (Defense Authorization Act of 2012) appears more threatening to Americans than Hitler’ (1933 DISCRIMINATORY LAWS. Hitler’s laws set time limits that Germans could be incarcerated for e.g., Serious Disturbance of the Peace and Rioting. But Senators Carl Levin (D) and John McCain’s ® bill broadly mandates holding Americans indefinitely in Military Custody for being a Combatant or Belligerent. A U.S. Police State Government can use The Defense Authorization Act; and Patriot Act that includes more than 350 civil asset forfeiture laws to threaten or seize the assets of any corporation or individual; to strong-arm U.S. corporations, institutions and others to support government actions including passage of more Police State (Fascist) legislation that will intimidate, threaten and curtail the civil liberties of Americans.

Immediately Below: compare The 1933 Nazi Decrees with Senators Carl Levin and John McCain’s National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

1933. ROBL. I 83.

DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF
THE PEOPLE AND STATE

Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:

Section 1
Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

Section 2
If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.

Section 4
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.

Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

Section 5
The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).
Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;
2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;
3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.

Section 6
This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

Reich President                                                                                                       Reich Chancellor                                                                                                      Reich Minister of the Interior
Reich Minister of Justice

Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns Over
Global Warming http://fxn.ws/mPQKmD

Harold Lewis, emeritus professor of physics at the University of
California-Santa Barbara, who resigned this month from the American Physical
Society after 67 years of loyal membership. His resignation letter said this:
“It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of
dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS
before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful
pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.” http://bit.ly/h2XnZ8

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in history . . .When people come
to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” –
UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, and award-winning PhD
environmental physical chemist. 

source:  

http://www.private-investigator singapore.com

Thank you for your care and concern and certainly I can understand why all this nonsense is so frightening.

Please take a minute to see the truth too:

Unfortunately, some disgruntled  people who had been previously involved with Adya Inc. allegedly got together to essentially, from what I’ve been lead to understand, wage a corporate attack on Adya.

All the accusations are completely 100% false. Please rest assured that your product is completely and totally the wonderful Adya we all love.

I would never sell anything that would harm someone.

Below there is TONS of information showing how all accusations are false.

Here are all the responses: http://www.blackmicaextract.biz/response.html

Official Statement from Adya Inc.: http://adyaclarity.com/official-statement

Latest press release: www.AdyaClarity.com

All Test results:

http://www.blackmicaextract.biz/test-results.html

http://www.blackmicaextract.biz/researchdocuments.html

About the Aluminum scare: http://adyaclarity.com/research

Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Adya-Clarity-Page/167760793237826?sk=wall&filter=1

Adya Inc. has just received notification that Canada has issued 2 new Natural Product Numbers for Themarox and for Adya Clarity. They say that it is safe to take up to 7 ½ teaspoons of Adya Clarity a day for adults. Now we can officially/legally publish supershot directions!

The issuances of these numbers knocks the accusations of Mike Adams, completely out of the water. It can be put to rest once and for all. It is impossible for Mike to maintain any of his accusations in light of this announcement.

It is very hard to obtain a Natural Product Number from Canada. The cost to even apply for one is $25,000. Even after paying this amount, you are not assured you will obtain one. We received two separate NPN’s for the price of one! The official Product License Issuance Letter and the two NPN Product Information are attached.

Also, I found this article, you may be interested in reading:

http://www.endtimeessentials.com/press-release-on-adya-clarity-the-truth/

Please let me know any questions or concerns you have further.

We are here for you!

Thank you kindly.