Categories
Cybersecurity infrastructure Intelwars threat models Video

Cyber Public Health

In a lecture, Adam Shostack makes the case for a discipline of cyber public health. It would relate to cybersecurity in a similar way that public health relates to medicine.

Share
Categories
Intelwars Squid Video

Friday Squid Blogging: Ram’s Horn Squid Video

This is the first video footage of a ram’s horn squid (Spirula spirula) .

As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered.

Read my blog posting guidelines here.

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: DC to Give Children Vaccine Consent Behind Their Parents’ Backs (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: the District of Criminals plans to give 11 year olds vaccine consent behind their parents’ backs; Oregon spearheads the war on the war on drugs; and the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry petitions the government to re-open the investigation into the 2001 anthrax false flag.

Share
Categories
Facebook.com Intelwars Video

Two-time USA memory champion quizzed on memorization of the US Constitution

On Tuesday’s episode of the “Chad Prather Show,” Chad and the gang were joined by two-time USA Memory Champion Ron White. In this clip, Chad selected random excerpts from the U.S. Constitution and prompted Ron with a few words to see if Ron could recite the full clause.

About Ron White

Ron White is a mnemonist, and was the USA memory champion in 2009 and 2010. In 2010, he appeared on the History Channel television program, “Stan Lee’s Superhumans.”

Watch the video and be amazed.

Use promo code CHAD to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.


Want more from Chad Prather?

To enjoy more of Chad’s comedy, craziness and common sense, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Share
Categories
2020 presidential election ABC News Coronavirus George Stephanopoulos Gov. kristi noem Intelwars south dakota Video voting irregularities

George Stephanopoulos ignores Gov. Kristi Noem as she rattles off examples of voting irregularities — but Noem puts the smackdown later on

George Stephanopoulos — host of ABC News’ “This Week” and prominent member of former President Bill Clinton’s administration — seemed to ignore or mischaracterize South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem’s examples of voting irregularities in last week’s presidential election.

What are the details?

During Sunday’s interview, Stephanopoulos asked Noem if she would work with former Vice President Joe Biden — whom numerous media outlets on Saturday declared the winner of the 2020 election over President Donald Trump — with regard to the coronavirus.

Noem’s interview came after far-left New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s, in which he urged Republicans to accept Biden’s victory and predicted more governors will acknowledge the pandemic’s severity once Trump leaves office,
Townhall reported.

“Well, it is a regional increase that we’re seeing. We are testing more,” Noem replied. “And, frankly … I’m not going to take advice from Gov. Cuomo. He has the second-worst death rate per 100,000 people in this nation. He’s at 173 deaths per 100,000 per capita; South Dakota’s at 54.”

She then noted such questions are “premature” since the election technically isn’t over, and legal challenges from the Trump camp appear to be on the way.

“We have not finished counting votes,” Noem said. “There’re states that have not been called, and back in 2000, [Democratic presidential nominee] Al Gore was given his day in court. We should give President Trump his day in court, let the process unfold because, George, we live in a republic. We are a government that gets its power from the consent of the governed. That is the people. They give their consent on Election Day. Election Day needs to be fair, honest, and transparent, and we need to be sure that we had an honest election before we decide who gets to be in the White House the next four years.”

Stephanopolous rushed in to interrupt while Noem was finishing her sentence, asking if she had any evidence that it wasn’t an honest election and adding that he’s spoken with Republican officials who gave “zero evidence” of widespread fraud.

Besides the fact that voting irregularities in a handful of swing states are at issue as opposed to “widespread fraud,” Noem told Stephanopolous his assertions were “absolutely not true” and that “people have signed legal documents, affidavits, stating that they saw illegal activities, and that is why we need to have this conversation in court. The New York Times itself said that there were clerical errors. … In Michigan we had computer glitches that changed Republican votes to Democrat votes. … Dead people voted in Pennsylvania.”

“So George, I don’t know how widespread it is. I don’t know if it will change the outcome of the election,” she added. “But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out? We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president. Why would we not afford the 70.6 million Americans that voted for Trump the same consideration? If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure we had a fair election.”

By the end of the interview, despite all the points Noem made, Stephanopoulos wedged in a whopper, saying “It starts with providing evidence; you still have not provided that, but I’m afraid we’re out of time today. Gov. Noem, thanks for your time.”

“Let the process work, and we will,” she said.

The smack comes down

Noem wasn’t about to let things go after the interview. She replied to the “This Week” video tweet of her chat with Stephanopoulos — and added a well-deserved zinger when the intrepid poster referred to her state as “North Dakota”:

“More mischaracterization from ABC,” she wrote. “Watch the interview, I gave several specific instances of serious election integrity concerns. Oh, and it’s SOUTH Dakota”:

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: sElection Chaos Proceeds as Planned (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: the selection chaos proceeds as planned; Hollywood stooges fawn over MI6; and the Canadian military admits to the most bizarre psyops campaign you’ve ever heard of.

Share
Categories
academic papers Intelwars side-channel attacks Video

Determining What Video Conference Participants Are Typing from Watching Shoulder Movements

Accuracy isn’t great, but that it can be done at all is impressive.

Murtuza Jadiwala, a computer science professor heading the research project, said his team was able to identify the contents of texts by examining body movement of the participants. Specifically, they focused on the movement of their shoulders and arms to extrapolate the actions of their fingers as they typed.

Given the widespread use of high-resolution web cams during conference calls, Jadiwala was able to record and analyze slight pixel shifts around users’ shoulders to determine if they were moving left or right, forward or backward. He then created a software program that linked the movements to a list of commonly used words. He says the “text inference framework that uses the keystrokes detected from the video … predict[s] words that were most likely typed by the target user. We then comprehensively evaluate[d] both the keystroke/typing detection and text inference frameworks using data collected from a large number of participants.”

In a controlled setting, with specific chairs, keyboards and webcam, Jadiwala said he achieved an accuracy rate of 75 percent. However, in uncontrolled environments, accuracy dropped to only one out of every five words being correctly identified.

Other factors contribute to lower accuracy levels, he said, including whether long sleeve or short sleeve shirts were worn, and the length of a user’s hair. With long hair obstructing a clear view of the shoulders, accuracy plummeted.

Share
Categories
Facebook.com Intelwars Video

Steve Deace: ‘If Joe Biden wins…’

BlazeTv’s, Steve Deace joined Glenn Beck and Allie Stuckey for Live coverage of the 2020 presidential election on Tuesday. In this clip, Deace explained what a Joe Biden win might mean for the church and Americans’ right to practice their freedom of religion.

“If Joe Biden wins tonight, you are going to have to defend your right to worship and your freedom of religion at a pace we’ve never seen before,” Deace said.

Watch the video for more. Tune in for LIVE 2020 election coverage
here.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Share
Categories
Change my mind COMEDY Crowder Crowder confronts CURRENT EVENTS fake news Funny conservative Intelwars liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mug club news Politics Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder Video Youtube.com

Steven Crowder’s Election 2020 COVERAGE LIVESTREAM

Steven and the LwC team bring you live coverage of election night 2020 with a star-studded cast of guests.


LIVE: Election 2020: Trump vs. Biden #CrowderElectionStream | Louder with Crowder

youtu.be

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
Change my mind COMEDY Crowder Crowder confronts CURRENT EVENTS fake news Funny conservative Intelwars liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mug club news Politics Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder Video Youtube.com

Steven Crowder’s Election 2020 COVERAGE LIVESTREAM

Steven and the LwC team bring you live coverage of election night 2020 with a star-studded cast of guests.


LIVE: Election 2020: Trump vs. Biden #CrowderElectionStream | Louder with Crowder

youtu.be

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
Equality vs. equity Intelwars Kamala Harris Marxism Video

Kamala Harris accused of promoting Marxism with video on ‘equality vs. equity’

Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) raised eyebrows over the weekend after she shared a video of herself explaining the difference between equality and equity, sparking accusations that the California Democrat was promoting Marxist ideals just days before Tuesday’s general election.

What are the details?

Harris tweeted out an animated video narrated by herself, declaring in her tweet that “there’s a big difference between equality and equity.”

“Equality suggests, ‘oh everyone should get the same amount,'” the senator explains in the clip, saying, “the problem with that, not everybody’s starting out from the same place.”

The cartoon shows a white man and a black man, both walking toward a mountain, but the black man is shown at a lower level of land and is unable to climb out while the white man presses on toward the peak.

“It’s about giving people the resources and the support they need, so that everyone can be on equal footing,” Harris goes on to say, while flowers spring up at the black man’s feet and the ground beneath him suddenly rises so that he can climb the mountain.

“Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place,” Harris says in closing, before a “Biden Harris 2020” banner is flashed on the screen.

Harris was immediately ridiculed for the message, with several high profile individuals accusing her of creating Marxist propaganda.

Writer Andrew Sullivan quoted Harris’ line that “equitable treatments means we all end up in the same place,” telling the California Democrat, “That’s equality of *outcomes* enforced by the government. They used to call that communism.”

Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw (Texas) shared Harris’ video to his own feed, describing it as such: “The false promise of the left, in 1 minute. Start out with a well-intentioned point on equality of opportunity, only to end it with the true Marxist intent: equity in outcomes. They leave out the part where equity must be enforced with unequal -and tyrannical- treatment.”

GOP Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.) wrote, “Sounds just like Karl Marx. A century of history has shown where that path leads. We all embrace equal opportunity, but government-enforced equality of outcomes is Marxism.”

The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh wrote an op-ed about Harris posting the video, declaring that her campaign with running mate Joe Biden “has finally gone full Marxist.”

The far-left Harris has been accused several times in the past of embracing Marxist ideas. The Daily Mail pointed out that President Trump told Fox Business of Harris: “She’s a communist. We’re going to have a communist [as president]? She’s going to be [president], in my opinion, within a month. Look, I sit next to Joe and I looked at Joe. Joe’s not lasting two months as president,”

Newsweek reported that during an interview with “60 Minutes” last month, Harris laughed off such claims after host Norah O’Donnell asked the vice presidential candidate if she had a “socialist or progressive perspective.”

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: The Truth About the Coronavirus Vaccine Trials (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: the COVID-19 vaccine trials are not what you think they are; the IMF announces Bretton Woods 2.0; and Halloween creepiness abounds in the latest Hollywood/White House crossover.

Share
Categories
Change my mind co COMEDY Crowder Crowder bits Crowder clips Crowder confronts Crowderbits CURRENT EVENTS fake news Funny conservative Intelwars Leftists meltdown liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mug club news Politics Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder Video Youtube.com

Reaction Reel: Leftists react to  Amy Coney Barrett confirmation

On Monday, the Senate officially confirmed Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States.

In this clip, Steven Crowder and the “Louder with Crowder” crew discussed Barrett’s Senate confirmation and the meltdowns shared across social media following her confirmation. Later, Crowder delved into the modern-day feminist mentality that seemed to abhor strong, successful conservative women like Barrett regardless of sex/gender/pronoun.

Watch the clip for details.

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
... 2020 democrats 2020 Election 2020 elections 60 Minutes blaze Blaze podcasts Blaze tv Blazetv Commentary conservative Conservative commentary Conservative News democratic party election Harris Intelwars Joe Biden Kamala Kamala Harris news Pat Pat gray Pat gray radio Pat gray unleashed Pat gray videos Pat grey Pat unleashed Pathhead Policy Politics Progressive Radio TALK RADIO TheBlaze USA Video Youtube.com

Kamala Harris says she will NOT bring socialist policies to a Biden administration

“60 Minutes” correspondent Norah O’Donnell pressed Sen. Kamala Harris on her reputation of being considered “the most liberal United States senator.”

In this clip, Pat Gray discussed the interview, and how O’Donnell pushed Harris about being a socialist.

“As we’ve said multiple times, [Kamala Harris] is the most liberal person, the most progressive senator we had in all of the Senate,” Pat said, “including Bernie Sanders, including Elizabeth Warren.”

O’Donnell sought clarification on whether Harris would support the policies of running mate, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Harris noted that Biden did not share her support for socialist policies, including the Green New Deal and legalizing marijuana.

“Are going to bring those progressive policies — that you supported as senator — into a Biden administration,” O’Donnell asked.

In Harris’ response, she claimed part of a deal she made with Biden was to share her lived experience and give an honest perspective on policy matters.

“And is that a socialist or progressive perspective?” O’Donnell asked.

Harris said she would not bring a socialist perspective to the table. Harris added that she would not have joined the Democratic ticket if she didn’t support Biden’s vision for America.

For more interview details, click here.

Pat commented on the bizarre interview and gave his opinion of Harris’ denial of being a socialist.

Watch the video for more.

Use promo code PAT to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Share
Categories
... 2020 democrats 2020 Election 2020 elections 60 Minutes blaze Blaze podcasts Blaze tv Blazetv Commentary conservative Conservative commentary Conservative News democratic party election Harris Intelwars Joe Biden Kamala Kamala Harris news Pat Pat gray Pat gray radio Pat gray unleashed Pat gray videos Pat grey Pat unleashed Pathhead Policy Politics Progressive Radio TALK RADIO TheBlaze USA Video Youtube.com

Kamala Harris says she will NOT bring socialist policies to a Biden administration

“60 Minutes” correspondent Norah O’Donnell pressed Sen. Kamala Harris on her reputation of being considered “the most liberal United States senator.”

In this clip, Pat Gray discussed the interview, and how O’Donnell pushed Harris about being a socialist.

“As we’ve said multiple times, [Kamala Harris] is the most liberal person, the most progressive senator we had in all of the Senate,” Pat said, “including Bernie Sanders, including Elizabeth Warren.”

O’Donnell sought clarification on whether Harris would support the policies of running mate, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Harris noted that Biden did not share her support for socialist policies, including the Green New Deal and legalizing marijuana.

“Are going to bring those progressive policies — that you supported as senator — into a Biden administration,” O’Donnell asked.

In Harris’ response, she claimed part of a deal she made with Biden was to share her lived experience and give an honest perspective on policy matters.

“And is that a socialist or progressive perspective?” O’Donnell asked.

Harris said she would not bring a socialist perspective to the table. Harris added that she would not have joined the Democratic ticket if she didn’t support Biden’s vision for America.

For more interview details, click here.

Pat commented on the bizarre interview and gave his opinion of Harris’ denial of being a socialist.

Watch the video for more.

Use promo code PAT to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Share
Categories
Crowder Crowder confronts Intelwars Politics Video

LIVE: Biden vs. Trump Final Presidential Debate

Steven Crowder and the crew live stream the final debate! Steven is joined by all-star guests Donald Trump Jr. and Senator Ted Cruz!

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: This Week in Tyranny (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: it’s This Week in Tyranny with Irish lockdowns, Australian digital entry certificates and Canadian digital ID; the central banks work on their digital currencies; and the fake musical “rebel” rant continues.

Share
Categories
Court packing Fox News Intelwars Joe Biden Supreme court confirmation tim kaine us senate Video

Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine says Biden shouldn’t answer court packing question ‘because it’s not his business’

As Democrats and the Joe Biden presidential campaign hover between refusing to answer the question on packing the Supreme Court or redefining what “packing the courts” means, one Senate Democrat says it’s none of Biden’s business anyway.

Speaking Monday on Fox News, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said the reason Democratic nominee Joe Biden won’t give his opinion on packing the courts is because it’s “not his business.” He argued that under the Constitution it is Congress, not the president, who dictates the composition of the Supreme Court by law.

“Why won’t he answer that question?” host Bill Hemmer asked Kaine.

“Well, I haven’t asked him but I have a pretty good idea, Bill. Because it’s not his business, the Constitution gives no power to the president or vice president to pack the court,” Kaine said.

“It’s not a presidential responsibility. Congress, according to Article I of the Constitution, sets the composition. So that’s why it’s not even a part of the campaign plan,” he continued.

Several progressive Democrats have argued that if Senate Republicans are successful in confirming Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the current vacancy on the court, the next Democratic Congress and president must expand the court to undo a potential 6-3 conservative majority.

Last Thursday, Biden again refused to answer the question when confronted by a reporter about his position on packing the Supreme Court.

“You’ll know my position on court packing when the election is over,” Biden said.

“You know, the moment I answer that question, the headline in every one of your papers will be about that, other than focusing on what’s happening now. The election has begun. There’s never been a court appointment once an election has begun,” he added.

Biden’s running mate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) likewise dodged the question during her debate with Vice President Mike Pence last week, instead attacking President Trump for making 50 court of appeals appointments and not nominating any black judges.

Other Democrats have attempted to redefine the term, accusing Republicans of “court packing” by filling court vacancies with President Trump’s nominees. Traditionally, “packing the court” refers to expanding the number of seats on the court to create a more favorable ideological makeup of the bench, not filling vacancies, which is the constitutional duty of the president and the Senate.

Biden himself pointed out in a 1983 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on nominations to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that the origins of the term “court-packing” go back to Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s threat to expand the Supreme Court after several of his New Deal programs were ruled unconstitutional.

“President Roosevelt clearly had the right to send to the United States Senate and the United States Congress a proposal to pack the court. It was totally within his right to do that. He violated no law. He was legalistically, absolutely correct,” a 40-year-old Biden told the commission. “But it was a bonehead idea. It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make. And it put in question, if for an entire decade, the independence of the most-significant body … in this country, the Supreme Court of the United States of America.”

Sen. Kaine was asked about Biden’s 1983 comments, which suggest that the composition of the court is, in fact, a president’s business.

“You haven’t heard Joe Biden say he wouldn’t send a plan to the court — I don’t think this is a matter for the president at all,” Kaine said, likely misspeaking as a president would send a court packing plan to Congress, not the court.

Kaine then accused Republicans of making two “momentous changes” to the way the court is composed, warning “they’re about to make a third.”

“The first was they refused to entertain the nomination of Merrick Garland, depriving President Obama in a historic way of being able to fill a position,” Kaine said. “Second, we used to require that a Supreme Court justice get 60 votes, a bipartisan measure of support, and we thought that was a good idea — Democrats thought that was a good idea, the Republicans changed that to elevate Neil Gorsuch to the court.”

The third change, Kaine argued, would be hypocritically confirming Barrett during an election year after refusing four years ago to give Garland a hearing.

Kaine did not mention that it was then-Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) who first ended the filibuster for circuit court level judicial nominations, creating the precedent that Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) invoked in ending the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations.

Prompted by Hemmer, Kaine also predicted that Barrett will have enough votes to be confirmed to the Supreme Court before the election on Nov. 3 but said he hopes the confirmation hearings will persuade some Republicans to change their votes and the next inaugurated president fill the court vacancy.

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: COVID Criminals Accused of Crimes Against Humanity (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: the COVID pushback gathers steam; the OPCW forfeits all credibility; and women can destroy the planet, too!

Share
Categories
Coronavirus COVID-19 Intelwars Medicine Seniors trump Video

President Trump vows medication used to treat his COVID-19 will soon be available free to seniors

President Donald Trump released a video message aimed at America’s senior citizens on Thursday, wherein he promised them that medication used to treat him for the coronavirus would soon be available to them for no charge.

What are the details?

“So, to my favorite people in the world, the seniors,” the president began. “I’m a senior, I know you don’t know that, nobody knows that, maybe you don’t have to tell ’em, but I’m a senior. We are making tremendous progress with this horrible disease that was sent over by China. China will pay a big price for what they did to the world and to us.”

“But we have medicines right now, and I call them a cure,” he continued. “I went to the hospital a week ago, I was very sick, and I took this medicine and it was incredible. It was incredible. I could have walked out the following day. Sooner. It was incredible the impact it had. And we’re going to make that and others that are similar to it, almost identical, we’re going to make them available immediately. We have an emergency use authorization use that I want to get signed immediately.”

Trump did not name the medication he was referring to, but Fox News reported that during an interview earlier in the day with Fox Business News’ Maria Bartiromo, “Trump touted the experimental antibody-based treatment made by Regeneron, saying ‘all I know is I had it and I was better within 24 hours. I felt perfect. I feel perfect now. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be able to speak to you.'”

The president also said in his video to seniors that “the [Federal Drug Administration] has moved at a level that they’ve never moved before,” claiming, “that’s because of me.”

“We’re taking care of our seniors,” Trump said. “You’re not vulnerable, but they like to say ‘the vulnerable’ — but you’re the least vulnerable — but for this one thing, you are vulnerable and so am I.”

He added, “I want you to get the same care that I got. I got incredible care at Walter Reed [Military Medical Center]. The incredible doctors, and this medicine — in particular this one medicine — was unbelievable.” The president said the medication would be available to seniors “soon,” at “no charge.”

Trump also took the opportunity to take a shot at Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, saying of his opponent, “He just talks, it’s the same old thing. If it were up to him, you wouldn’t have this, you wouldn’t have anything near it for years. They wouldn’t be talking about anything like this. He had his chance with H1N1 swine flu and it was one of the great disasters. He didn’t know what he was doing, but I do know what I’m doing.”

Share
Categories
Campaign 2020 Donald Trump Election 2020 Intelwars Joe Biden Michelle Obama Video

Michelle Obama slams Trump as ‘racist’, defends BLM, advocates for Joe Biden in ‘closing argument’

Former first lady Michelle Obama blasted President Donald Trump’s policies as “racist” and beneficial to the rich and powerful in a campaign video making her “closing argument” for Democratic nominee Joe Biden 28 days from the presidential election in November.

In a 24-minute speech published on YouTube, the former first lady adopted talking points lifted from progressive election strategists who urged Democrats to link “racism and class conflict” in the left’s appeal to voters.

“Right now, our country is in chaos because of a president who isn’t up to the job,” Obama said.

Writing in the New York Times last month, progressive researchers Ian Haney López, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and Tory Gavito, founder of the left-wing Texas Future Project, called on Democrats to adjust their message to reach Hispanics and other voter groups the Biden campaign is struggling to consolidate support from.

“Democrats should call for Americans to unite against the strategic racism of powerful elites who stoke division and then run the country for their own benefit,” López and Gavito wrote. “This is not to deny the reality of pervasive societal racism. But it does direct attention away from whites in general and toward the powerful elites who benefit from divide-and-conquer politics.”

They proposed Democrats adopt a message like this:

We had come so far, but now Covid-19 threatens our families — for instance with health risks, record unemployment and losing the businesses we worked hard to build. To overcome these challenges, we need to pull together no matter our race or ethnicity. But instead of uniting us, certain politicians make divisions worse, insulting and blaming different groups. When they divide us, they can more easily rig our government and the economy for their wealthy campaign donors. When we come together by rejecting racism against anyone, we can elect new leaders who support proven solutions that help all working families.

That is exactly the message Obama used in her speech.

“Let’s be very real, America is divided right now, and a lot of people are being sold lies from those who want to get rich or stay in power, or sometimes both,” she said. “We must all empathize with those who might not look like us or vote like us. We have got to put ourselves in one another’s shoes.”

“Think about it,” she continued. “You’ve worked hard all your life and for too long you’ve watched the rich get richer. You’ve lost your farms and your livelihoods to corporate greed, you’ve seen your beloved towns shattered by joblessness, you’ve watched families destroyed by drug addiction and mental health challenges. All of this, long before this virus hit. And it is frustrating to hear some folks say that you’ve been the beneficiary of privilege, that the color of the skin gives you a head start. That is the reality for far too many hard-working decent Americans.

“But right now, the president and his allies are trying to tap into that frustration and distract from his breathtaking failures by giving folks someone to blame other than them,” she said.

Obama defended Black Lives Matter protests and said “the president and his allies” are “stoking fears about black and brown Americans, lying about how minorities will destroy the suburbs, whipping up violence and intimidation — and they’re pinning it all on what’s been an overwhelmingly peaceful movement for racial solidarity.”

Obama claimed “only a tiny fraction of demonstrations had any violence at all” and labels the president’s calls for law and order in U.S. cities beset by civil unrest “racist.”

She accused Trump of failing to take the coronavirus pandemic seriously, appealing to U.S. parents who are concerned for their children’s safety as schools reopen.

“If you’re a parent like me, you’re feeling the consequences of this president’s failure to take this pandemic seriously — from his constant downplaying of the importance of masks and social distancing to his relentless pressure on schools to open without offering a clear plan or meaningful support to keep students and teachers safe,” Obama said.

She said Trump, with all the resources of the United States government, failed to provide a plan to ensure Americans were tested for coronavirus and health care workers received the medical equipment they needed to handle a surge of sick patients. She said the president lied to the American people about the severity of the virus and attempted to “gaslight the American people by acting like this pandemic is not a real threat.”

Obama attacked Trump for allegedly calling U.S. military war dead “losers” and “suckers,” comments Trump denies making that were divulged to the press by anonymous sources. She also criticized the president and Republicans in Congress for failing to deliver additional stimulus aid to Americans facing economic hardship caused by the pandemic.

Former Vice President Joe Biden “has the character and the experience to put an end to this chaos, start solving these problems, and help lighten the load for families across the country,” Obama said.

Obama made several appeals to race in her speech, asking undecided voters for “empathy.”

“As a black woman, who has like the overwhelming majority of people of color in this nation done everything in my power to live a life of dignity and service and honesty, the knowledge that any of my fellow Americans is more afraid of me than the chaos we are living through right now — well that hurts. It hurts us all. It is a heaviness that sits on our hearts,” Obama said.

So I want to appeal for some empathy here too. I want everyone who is still undecided to think about all those folks like me and my ancestors. The moms and dads who worked their fingers to the bone to raise their kids right. The teenagers who wear hoodies while working hard to get their diplomas. The millions of folks who look like me and fought and died and toiled as slaves and soldiers and laborers to help build this country. Put yourselves in our shoes for just a moment. Imagine how it feels to wake up every day and do your very best to uphold the values that this country claims to hold dear — truth, honor, decency — only to have those efforts met by scorn not just by your fellow citizens but by a sitting president. Imagine how it feels to have suspicion cast on you from the day you were born simply because of the hue of your skin. To walk around your own country scared that someone’s unjustified fear of you could put you in harm’s way, terrified of what four more years of this kind of division might mean for the safety of you and those you love. Living with the knowledge that no matter how hard we try, how much good we do in the world, there will be far too many who will never see our humanity, who will project on us their own fears of retribution for centuries of injustice and thus only see us as a threat to be restrained, and we know what happens next. A racial slur from a passing car. A job promotion that never comes. A routine traffic stop gone wrong. Maybe a knee to the neck.

“Racism. Fear. Division. These are powerful weapons. And they can destroy this nation if we don’t deal with them head-on,” Obama said.

“Search your hearts, and your conscience, and then vote for Joe Biden like your lives depend on it.”


Michelle Obama’s Closing Argument | Joe Biden For President 2020

www.youtube.com

Share
Categories
Breonna taylor Daniel cameron Fox News Intelwars Kentucky ag Tucker Carlson Video

Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron responds to racially charged criticism over Breonna Taylor case: ‘It is repugnant’

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron responded to racially charged criticism launched at him for his handling of the Breonna Taylor investigation, saying the names he’s been called are “repugnant.”

“It is so unfortunate that because I have a different political philosophy and because in my role as the attorney general and as the special prosecutor in the Breonna Taylor investigation, because I led with the facts and the truth, and had that lead to the conclusion, somehow I betrayed my race,” Cameron told Fox News host Tucker Carlson in an interview Thursday.

After Cameron announced that the officers involved in Taylor’s death would not be charged with murder, outraged commentators called him names like “sellout negro,” “Uncle Tom,” and said he was “skinfolk” but not “kinfolk.” The only charge was issued against one officer for wanton endangerment.

“It is repugnant. It is so disappointing, but it’s par for the course,” Cameron said in response to his critics. “Anytime someone stands for the truth, and when that truth is different from a narrative that has been pushed by others, this is how they respond.”


Kentucky AG responds to harsh criticism he faced on Breonna Taylor decision

www.youtube.com

“I’m here tonight to say that enough is enough,” he added. “Black Republicans, folks that believe in the truth … we are going to stand up.

“That’s what I did in presenting all of the information to the grand jury in the Breonna Taylor investigation, and that is what I’m charged to do. That is my responsibility as the attorney general of the Commonwealth of Kentucky,” he continued.

On Sept. 23, Cameron held a news conference to announce the results of the state attorney general’s investigation into Taylor’s shooting death.

TheBlaze covered the news conference and the facts of the night Taylor died as recounted by Cameron:

When the three officers charged into Taylor’s apartment around 1 a.m. March 13, Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired one shot at them. The officers were not in uniform, and Walker said he thought it was a home invasion. Walker shot Mattingly in the leg. The three officers returned fire with more than 20 shots. Taylor was shot five times.

Attorney General Daniel Cameron said that despite reports that it was a no-knock raid, the officers did knock and announce themselves before entering the apartment.

Cameron said that because the police were fired upon first, the returned fire was justified and Kentucky state law prevented him from charging the police with Taylor’s killing. Two of the officers Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and Detective Myles Cosgrove, did not face any charges. The third officer, former LMPD Sgt. Brett Hankison, was charged with three counts of wanton endangerment for allegedly firing his gun recklessly.

Asked by Carlson to dispel the biggest “myth” surrounding the facts of the shooting, Cameron criticized the claim that the police officer who was allegedly shot by Kenneth Walker actually shot himself.

“Well, the biggest myth that is being promoted right now is the idea that Sgt. Mattingly, one of the office officers who was administering the search warrant in the morning hours at Breonna Taylor’s apartment, was shot by friendly fire, meaning shot by another officer,” Cameron said. “Look, I’ve taken to calling this a conspiracy theory. In order to believe this narrative that’s being promoted by the defense attorney in Louisville, Kentucky, you have to believe, (1) to defy physics and disregard the trajectory analysis, but you have to believe that the officer that was standing outside the apartment shooting into the apartment, that he had a magic bullet, and that that bullet went through the apartment unit and then made a sharp turn left without any obstruction or any impediment to match it up with the entry point of the wound that Sergeant Mattingly suffered.

“It is a silly notion; it’s one of the biggest myths that has been promoted here in the last few weeks,” Cameron continued. “Before three weeks ago and before this defense attorney uttered this statement, it was a foregone conclusion that what happened that evening was that Kenny Walker, Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend, fired a shot at the officers. The officers responded and returned fire, justified in doing so because they had been fired upon. And the tragedy, and again, I’ve said this from the very beginning, the tragedy here is that Breonna Taylor was in that hallway as well and was hit.

“But the tragedy doesn’t allow for me to not present the facts and the truth, and that’s what we’ve done here,” he said.

Cameron blamed celebrity and media commentators for driving false narratives about the shooting, leading to confusion about what happened.

“Well, again, there were a lot of people inside and outside, a lot of celebrities, a lot of folks that were either misrepresenting the facts because it was to their advantage, or didn’t know all the information,” Cameron said. “They made conclusions first and then want to cherry-pick the facts to meet those conclusions. I don’t have that luxury as the attorney general here in the commonwealth. My responsibility is to the truth and to the information, and then that is ultimately what leads to the conclusion. We presented all the information to the grand jury. Ultimately, we presented to them as well the fact that the officers, Mattingly and Cosgrove, were fired upon and they were justified in returning their fire.

“We obviously have a prosecution into a third officer that was there that night,” he continued. “I can’t get into the specifics because that is an ongoing prosecution, but again, a lot of folks had already made up their mind and weren’t interested in what the truth is, and now are still trying to cherry-pick so that they can fashion a narrative that meets their agenda and advances their own interests.”

Since Cameron delivered his news conference in September, several new facts have come to light that raise questions about the findings the Kentucky attorney general’s office presented.

Bodycam footage made public days after the investigation’s findings were released appear to show Louisville Metro Police Department officers and SWAT team members breaking department policy regarding officer-involved shooting incidents.

As Leon Wolf wrote for TheBlaze:

Notably, for obvious reasons, officers who are involved in a shooting are prohibited per LMPD policy from being involved in the investigation of those shootings and are furthermore explicitly required to be promptly separated from the scene and paired with a “peer support” escort who can both comfort shaken officers and also vouch for the fact that the officers did not fabricate evidence or otherwise adulterate the crime scene.

Videos taken of the shooting aftermath show that this policy was flagrantly disregarded, particularly by the now-terminated Hankison and Cosgrove, and that the SWAT and Public Integrity Unit officers who were there complained aloud about the officers they were investigating still being “in the mix” and even actually in the active crime scene. One of the other officers involved in the raid was also observed to have left the scene and been canvassing witnesses.

Also, a ballistics report released recently contradicted Cameron’s claim that Walker shot first and struck Mattingly and that friendly fire was ruled out.

From the New York Post:

Kentucky State Police said that “due to limited markings of comparative value,” the bullet that hit Mattingly was neither “identified nor eliminated” as coming from a 9mm pistol fired by Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, the outlet said.

The ballistics report also contradicted Cameron’s claim that the cops only carried .40-caliber handguns, when the shot that hit Mattingly was a 9mm.

The report said Police Officer Brett Hankison had also been issued a 9mm handgun.

A separate FBI ballistics report has been received by Cameron’s office but has not yet been released.

Share
Categories
#NewWorldNextWeek alternative news corbett report Intelwars Media Monarchy mediaMonarchy new world next week podcast Video

#NewWorldNextWeek: Palantir Police State Wizardry Goes Public (Video)

This week on the New World Next Week: MI6 involvement in Iran coup finally confirmed; Palantir goes public as police state ramps up; and JPMorgan found guilty of market manipulation.

Share
Categories
Alaska Elecion 2022 Intelwars Lisa Murkowski republican primary Sarah Palin us senate Video

Sarah Palin calls out Lisa Murkowski for opposing Trump’s Supreme Court nominee: ‘I can see 2022 from my house’

Could Sarah Palin challenge Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) in the 2022 Alaska Republican Senate primary?

The former governor of Alaska and 2008 running mate with Republican presidential candidate John McCain said she “can see 2022 from my house” in a video calling out Murkowski for opposing President Donald Trump’s plan to nominate a new Supreme Court justice before the presidential election.

“Lisa Murkowski, this is my house,” Palin says in the video. “I’m willing to give it up for the greater good of this country.”

“If you can’t find it within yourself to do the right thing this time and at least give a fair shake to the Supreme Court nominee that your president will be bringing before you,” Palin continues.

She demands that Murkowski do “what the majority of Americans want you to do when you were sent to Washington, D.C.”

She urges Murkowski to “backtrack” her opposition to a Trump nominee.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Murkowski refused to commit to supporting a Republican-led effort to confirm a new justice.

“I know everybody wants to ask the question, ‘Will you confirm the nominee?'” Murkowski said. “We don’t have a nominee yet. You and I don’t know who that is. And so I can’t confirm whether or not I can confirm a nominee when I don’t know who the nominee is.”

She reaffirmed her position that she “would not support taking up a potential Supreme Court vacancy this close to the election.”

“Sadly, what was then a hypothetical is now our reality, but my position has not changed,” Murkowski said. “I did not support taking up a nomination eight months before the 2016 election to fill the vacancy created by the passing of Justice Scalia.”

“We are now even closer to the 2020 election — less than two months out — and I believe the same standard must apply,” she added.

Palin suggested Murkowski’s instance on waiting for the election indicates she hopes President Trump loses.

“You’d better backtrack … you know you’d already put yourself in this box saying no matter who it is you’re not going to support the person, not until you have the chance to appoint a judicial nominee under another president instead of this one?” Palin asked. “You’re hoping what, that this president doesn’t win?

“Otherwise you’d be cooperating with the president, really what it is is cooperating with the majority of Americans who know that it’s now or never for America.”

“So much hinges on the Supreme Court … you know why it’s so important and that’s why you’re thinking you’re going to go rogue,” Palin says. “There’s a time and a place to go rogue, this isn’t the time. This isn’t the place.”

Palin ends the video with a possible threat to challenge Murkowski when her term ends in 2022.

“We sure hope that you have it within you have it within you to do the right thing this time. So you should walk back, we’ll forgive you,” Palin says. “If you can’t do that, remember my house? I can see a lot of things from my house.

“Lisa, I can see 2022 from my house.”

This is not the first time Palin has threatened to challenge Murkowski. In 2018, when Murkowski opposed the Supreme Court nomination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Palin tweeted “Hey @LisaMurkowski – I can see 2022 from my house …”

Watch:


Former Governor Sarah Palin calls out Murkowski.

www.youtube.com

Share