Categories
2024 bid Intelwars Mike Pompeo trump WHITE HOUSE

Mike Pompeo doesn’t rule out 2024 White House bid — even if Trump runs

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Friday that he has not ruled out running for Republican presidential nominee in 2024 — even if his former boss, President Donald Trump, makes another White House bid that year.

What are the details?

During an interview with Fox Business’ “WSJ at Large,” host Gerard Baker asked Pompeo, “Are you seriously pondering a run in 2024 for the Republican nomination?”

“Just like every day, I’m going to go work for the set of policies that I’ve been working on all my life, including these last four years as CIA director and then secretary of state,” Pompeo replied.

“I think America first makes an awful lot of sense,” he continued. “We’ve got to do that here at home as well.”

Pompeo went on to say, “What happens electorally in ’22 matters an awful lot. I’m going to go work to help good conservative candidates be elected, and then we’ll consider whether 2024 is an opportunity for me to go back to elected office or not. I love the fight, Gerry.”

Baker then asked, “If President Trump runs again — and all indications are that he may — would you run against him?”

“That’s a long way off,” Pompeo responded, “I don’t think any of us have figured out what we’re doing 2024.” But the former secretary of state left the possibility open, adding, “We’ll make make those decisions another time.”

Speculation about Pompeo running has ramped up in recent weeks after he traveled to Iowa and made a number of stops at GOP gatherings, in what CNN called “an unofficial but unsubtle step into the 2024 presidential race.”

Pompeo declared on the March 26 trip, “We’re in Iowa after all — the first-in-the-nation primary.” Iowa is the first state to caucus, and the first primary is then held in New Hampshire.

Anything else?

Pompeo also hit the news Friday after the State Department’s inspector general’s office released the findings of its investigation into allegations that the former secretary of state and his wife, Susan Pompeo, instructed State Department staff to perform personal tasks for the couple on the taxpayer’s dime.

Politico obtained the report, which found “over 100 requests to Department employees” by the Pompeos “that are inconsistent with the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch or raised questions about the proper use of Department resources.”

Examples of tasks carried out by State Department employees for the Pompeos allegedly included addressing and mailing their Christmas cards, booking hair appointments for Mrs. Pompeo, planning non-government-affiliated events and setting up restaurant reservations for the family.

The outlet reported:

Mike Pompeo, in an interview with investigators, insisted that the requests were often small and the types of things friends do for friends. His lawyer, William Burck, slammed a draft version of the report he received as a politically biased “compilation of picayune complaints cherry-picked by the drafters.”

The inspector general’s office, however, defended the investigation, noting that many of the rules governing such interactions are clear, do not make exceptions for small tasks, and that the Pompeos’ requests ultimately added up to use a significant amount of the time of employees paid by taxpayers.

Share
Categories
Abortion administration Biden COVID-19 Intelwars pandemic Pills trump

Biden administration to ‘temporarily’ allow abortion pills by mail citing pandemic

The Biden administration is set to “temporarily” lift a Trump administration policy requiring women seeking abortion-inducing drug Mifepristone — also known as RU486 — to be administered in person by health professionals, allowing the pills to be disbursed via mail citing the coronavirus pandemic.

What are the details?

CBS News reported that acting FDA Commission Janet Woodcock informed the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists in a letter on Monday that her agency would allow providers in some states to “exercise enforcement discretion,” citing studies that dismissed any “serious safety concerns…occurring with medical abortion as a result of modifying the in-person dispensing requirement during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Pro-life organization March for Life said of the move:

“With this action, the Biden administration has made it clear that it will prioritize abortion over women’s safety. Allowing unsupervised chemical abortions via telemedicine, without requiring timely access to medical care, will put women in grave danger.

“Data released in 2018 by the FDA shows thousands of adverse events caused by abortion pills, including 768 hospitalizations and 24 deaths since 2000. Chemical abortions should have more medical oversight not less.”

CBS reported that the “temporary” action by the Biden administration handed “abortion-rights groups one of their first major victories of the new administration.”

It was only the first move of the week by President Joe Biden’s administration in rolling back abortion restrictions imposed by former President Donald Trump.

On Wednesday, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed a rule change that would reverse a Trump-era policy that bans abortion referral-services from receiving federal funding, according to ABC News. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provided, was hardest hit when Trump implemented the restriction.

In a separate report, CBS News explained:

The current rules stemmed from the Trump administration’s promise to “defund Planned Parenthood.” The rule change prompted Planned Parenthood to exit the program, forgoing an estimated $60 million. In 2018, more than four million people relied on Title X for health care services, 41% of whom received services at Planned Parenthood, according to the health clinic.

For decades, Biden — a lifelong Catholic — supported the 1980 Hyde Amendment, which prohibits taxpayer dollars being spent on abortions. But he reversed his position on the policy when he ran for the Democratic ticket in 2020.

Share
Categories
Americans COVID-19 Intelwars Recommends trump Vaccine

Trump recommends Americans get vaccinated for COVID-19

Former President Donald Trump said Tuesday night that he recommends Americans get vaccinated for COVID-19, reassuring people that the inoculations are safe.

What are the details?

During a primetime interview on Fox News, host Maria Bartiromo asked Trump, “Mr. President, I know that you received the vaccine, Mrs. Trump also got the vaccine. Would you recommend to our audience that they get the vaccine then?”

“I would,” Trump replied. “I would recommend it, and I would recommend it to a lot of people that don’t want to get it — and a lot of those people voted for me, quite frankly.”

“But, again,” he continued. “We have our freedoms, and we have to live by that. And I agree with that also. But it is a great vaccine. It is a safe vaccine.”

There are various coronavirus vaccines now available to Americans, some of which were created during the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed — the foundational program for development and rollout of the inoculations in the U.S.

The former president made the statement after Dr. Fauci told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he hoped Trump would encourage his supporters to get vaccinated, Politico noted.

The outlet reported that “skepticism of the Covid vaccine has mostly fallen along party lines,” after “a recent
CBS News poll found a third of Republicans say they do not plan to get the vaccine, and an NPR/Marist poll showed that almost half of Republican men will not get the vaccine.”

While neither Trump nor former First Lady Melania Trump took the vaccines publicly nor have they acknowledged taking the shots, anonymous sources reported earlier this month that the pair got the jabs at the White House in January before leaving office, CBS News reported.

Last week, the Ad Council released a video of all other living former presidents calling on Americans to get the COVID-19 vaccine when available.

The New York Times reported Monday that “Trump was not asked to participate, as the others were, because at the time it was filmed, during Mr. Biden’s inauguration, he had not yet disclosed that he had been vaccinated.”

A Trump adviser told the newspaper had not been approached “in any formal way to speak directly to his supporters.”


Former Presidents and First Ladies ‘It’s Up To You’ :60 | Ad Council and COVID Collaborative

www.youtube.com

Share
Categories
Adviser Andy Slavitt Biden COVID-19 Intelwars Tip my hat trump

Top Biden COVID adviser: ‘I would absolutely tip my hat’ to Trump for Operation Warp Speed

President Joe Biden’s White House senior adviser for COVID-19 response acknowledged Thursday that former President Donald Trump and his administration deserve credit for the development and rollout of coronavirus vaccines under Operation Warp Speed.

Andy Slavitt said he would “absolutely” tip his hat to them for their accomplishments.

What are the details?

Slavitt told Fox News that he was grateful for the work done on vaccines prior to Biden taking office, saying, “I would absolutely tip my hat” when asked by host Bill Hemmer about his take on the success of Operation Warp Speed.

“This is a scientific process that actually began more than a decade ago with scientists inside the NIH…creating this mRNA vaccine,” Slavitt said..

He added, “I think the Trump administration made sure that we got — in record time — a vaccine up and out. That’s a great thing and something we should all be excited about.”

Hemmer then asked Slavitt why other members of the Biden administration “were talking about the shelves being empty,” noting, “on inauguration day, you had what. 1.5 million shots in the arms of Americans.”

“Look, I don’t think this is an effort to point fingers,” Slavitt replied.

Politico reported:

The Biden administration has previously said that the Trump administration left them “a mess” on Covid vaccination and President Joe Biden himself called Trump’s vaccine rollout in the early days a “dismal failure.”

Vice President Kamala Harris even told Axios last month that the Biden administration had to start from “scratch,” a claim Dr. Anthony Fauci had shot down weeks prior when he said “we certainly are not starting from scratch” on vaccine distribution.

Slavitt was also asked whether Biden would give Trump any credit for his role in the vaccine rollout when the president addresses the nation Thursday evening.

“He will try to look forward and talk about the commitments that he has made and that we’ve got to make to getting the country vaccinated, to getting people back up and standing,” Slavitt replied. “Our view is there really are no bad guys here. We are going to succeed together or we are going to fail together.”


Biden Advisor Slavitt Praises Trump Admin’s Operation Warp Speed: “I Would Absolutely Tip My Hat”

www.youtube.com

Anything else?

President Trump issued a statement this week reminding the American public of the success of Operation Warp Speed, writing, “I hope everyone remembers when they’re getting the COVID-19 (often referred to as the China Virus) Vaccine, that if I wasn’t President, you wouldn’t be getting that beautiful ‘shot’ for 5 years, at best, and probably wouldn’t be getting it at all. I hope everyone remembers!”

Share
Categories
Conservative actress Intelwars Stacey Dash Stacey dash trump trump Trump supporter

Conservative actress Stacey Dash denounces her support for Trump, says she’s done with politics

Conservative actress and ex-Fox News contributor Stacey Dash denounced her past support of former President Donald Trump and apologized for past comments she made while on the network during a recent interview.

The former “Clueless” star told the Daily Mail this week that she’s done with politics and never plans to work in political media again. She also claimed the network typecast her as an “angry, conservative black woman,” and said that role eventually wore her down.

“I’ve lived my life being angry, which is what I was on Fox News. I was the angry, conservative black woman. And at that time in my life it was who I was,” she said. “I realized in 2016 that anger is unsustainable and it will destroy you. I made a lot of mistakes because of that anger.

“There are things that I am sorry for,” she continued. “Things that I did say, that I should not have said them the way I said them. They were very arrogant and prideful and angry. And that’s who Stacey was, but that’s not who Stacey is now. Stacey’s someone who has compassion, empathy.”

Dash became a darling of conservatives ahead of the 2016 election cycle by passionately speaking out about conservative values and taking aim at the Hollywood liberal elite.

At times, her passion sparked controversy. One such example was in 2015 when she claimed on-air that former President Barack Obama “couldn’t give a s**t” about terrorism. Another occurred in 2018 during an interview with MSNBC, when she defended comments Trump made about the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Now she says, “God has forgiven me, how dare I not forgive someone else. I don’t want to be judged, so how dare I judge anyone else. So if anyone has ever felt that way about me, like I’ve judged, that I apologize for because that’s not who I am.”

Dash didn’t deny personal responsibility in stirring up political controversy while at Fox News, but she did claim the network paid her to do as much.

“I’m not a victim of anyone. Working for Fox at the time, that was my job. I did my job from the place I was at. Stacey now would never work at Fox, would never work for a news network or be a news contributor,” she said.

As for her support of Trump, Dash said, “He is not the president. We have a new president. Being a supporter of Trump has put me in some kind of box that I don’t belong in. But he’s not the president. I’m going to give the president that we have right now a chance.”

Dash, who also ran unsuccessfully for Congress in California in 2018, added that the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 was an important turning point for her.

“I think the Capitol Riots were appalling,” she said. “When that happened I was like ‘Ok, I’m done. I’m truly done.’ Because senseless violence of any kind I denounce. What happened on January 6 was just appalling and stupid.”

Share
Categories
editorial GOP Intelwars leave Spar trump Wall Street Journal

Trump fires back at Wall Street Journal editorial board after they urge GOP to leave him behind

Former President Donald Trump fired back at the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, issuing a statement saying the editorial board has “lost great credibility” after they published a piece asking, “If he was so great politically for the GOP, why is the party now out of power?”

What are the details?

In an editorial printed Monday, the board wrote that “as long as Republicans focus on the grievances of the Trump past, they won’t be a governing majority,” lambasting the former president while chiding, “if 2020 was so fabulous, why are Republicans shut out of power up and down Pennsylvania Avenue?”

The Journal pointed to Trump losing to President Joe Biden by 7 million votes and blamed the former president for Republicans losing in January’s Georgia Senate runoff races — which handed Democrats control of the upper chamber.

Trump wrote in response:

“The Wall Street Journal editorial page continues, knowingly, to fight for globalist policies such as bad trade deals, open borders, and endless wars that favor other countries and sell out our great American workers, and they fight for RINOS that have so badly hurt the Republican Party. That’s where they are and that’s where they will always be. Fortunately, nobody cares much about The Wall Street Journal editorial anymore. They have lost great credibility.”

He went on to blame “Georgia Republican leadership and Governor [Brian] Kemp (R)” in what he called “a rigged election,” along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for the Senate flipping blue.

The Hill noted that “Many Republicans believe Trump’s claims suppressed the GOP vote in rural Georgia, where some voters didn’t think their ballots would count, and in the Atlanta suburbs, where right-leaning independents were turned off by the GOP infighting and claims about a conspiracy.”

Anything else?

Thursday evening, the WSJ editorial board wrote another piece in response, hitting out at Trump again.

“For someone who says we don’t matter, he sure spends a lot of time reading and responding to us,” they said of the former president, adding, “thanks for the attention.”

The paper stood by its original piece, doubling down and writing:

Losing to Joe Biden of all people, and by 7.1 million votes as an incumbent President, must be painful. Counseling could be in order. Any good analyst will explain that the first step toward recovery is to accept reality. The same applies to Republican voters who want to win back Congress in 2022 and the White House in 2024.

Share
Categories
2020 Election 2020 elections Anti-racism Anti-racist Antiracist Biden Black Lives Matter BLM Change my mind Clark county COMEDY CPAC Crowder Crowder bits Crowder bits playlist1776 Crowder clips Crowder confronts Crowderbits CURRENT EVENTS Donald Trump Dr seuss books Dr. Seuss election election fraud fake news Fraud Funny conservative George floyd Horton How to be an antiracist How to debate How to debunk Intelwars Joe Biden liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mental Health Mug club NBC Nbc tv Nevada news Politics Presidential Election Secure election Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder The cat in the hat trump Trump Supporters US election Video Vote Voter voter fraud Youtube.com

‘How do you fix it?’ – Steven Crowder speaks to Clark County Elections Office about voter rolls

Recently, TheBlaze.com reported, “Conservative comedian and BlazeTV host Steven Crowder claimed that an unknown person or group attempted to engage in a cover-up by altering public records to hide the fact that a former Hillary Clinton staffer — who has allegedly been missing for two years — voted illegally in Nevada during the 2020 election.”

Crowder made a phone call Wednesday to the Clark County Elections Office and spoke to Dan Cullen about known voter roll errors.

Crowder asked if Clark County had required voters to verify their identification before their voter information is updated. Crowder simply wanted to know if there is a process in place that ensures voter information is updated accurately.

“How do you fix it? This is a person who voted from an address that does not exist,” Crowder asked.

Cullen eventually admitted that there is no law in place that can guarantee voter information is accurate.

Watch the clip for more details. Can’t watch? Download the podcast.

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
Conseratives good germans Hate conservatives Intelwars trump Trump Supporters

Salon writer insults conservatives as ‘good Germans’ standing by amid Trump’s reign of fascist terror

Chauncey DeVega, a political columnist for the liberal outlet, Salon, recently blasted modern-day conservatives for “enabling and defending” former President Donald Trump’s “crimes” in a scathing op-ed, comparing them to “good Germans” during Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party rule.

“Good Germans” is an ironic term often used to describe German citizens during World War II who claimed not to support the Nazi regime but who, in practice, did little or nothing to combat its terrible reign.

And so, to DeVega, because Trump is “a force of political, human, moral and economic destruction” and the leader of a national “neofascist and white supremacist movement” — much like Hitler was — those who stand idly by while he commits his crimes are merely “an extension of his political cult and crime family.”

DeVega’s column, seething in vitriol toward conservatives, shows just how terrified the left is of Trump, fretting over his influence even now after he has been voted out of office. After all, in a recent survey, Democratic voters listed “Trump supporters” as the No. 1 issue causing them concern.

“Although Trump was defeated by Joe Biden at the polls,” warned DeVega, he enjoys historic levels of support and “is now positioning himself as a shadow president.” Though he never exactly clarified what he meant by the conspiracy-laden term.

But in an effort to prove his point, DeVega lamented the fact that even after Trump incited political violence at the Capitol — which he characterized as “part of a larger plot to overthrow American democracy” — public opinion polls show the Republican Party remains loyal to him.

He also recalled that a recent Gallup survey found that a majority of Republicans desire that the party move further right, rather than closer to the center. In the poll, 40% of Republicans said they wanted the party to become “more conservative,” while 34% want it to “stay the same” and only 24% wanted it to become “more moderate.”

But this is where DeVega’s argument completely breaks down. Today’s conservatives are not, as he says, “hid[ing] behind fictions of plausible deniability for the evils committed by their leader.” Rather, they are celebrating his achievements and openly supporting his platform.

Nevertheless, DeVega argues that conservatives, “like the ‘good Germans’ of the Nazi era … are calling themselves ‘conservatives’ [in] an effort to shield themselves from responsibility and complicity.”

“Whatever ‘conservative’ once meant in American politics, it’s now just a flimsy rhetorical shield for fascism,” he added, showing he has no understanding of the American conservative movement whatsoever.

Share
Categories
elections Intelwars Podcasts trump

Episode 395 – Precedent Trump


So here we are in 2021, living in the smoking wreckage of Pax Americana. What was the meaning of the last four years? What lessons have been learned, and how will those lessons be applied going forward? What, in other words, was Precedent Trump?
Share
Categories
2024 back Intelwars Mitch McConnell trump

Mitch McConnell says he will ‘absolutely’ back Trump if former president is 2024 GOP nominee

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Thursday that if former President Donald Trump becomes the Republican Party’s presidential nominee again in 2024, he would “absolutely” throw his support behind the former president.

But, he says, a lot could happen between now then.

What are the details?

During an interview with Fox News‘ Bret Baier, the anchor asked McConnell if he believed Trump would be the GOP nominee during the next president election as some have predicted.

“Well, there’s a lot to happen between now and ’24,” the GOP leader responded, revealing, “I’ve got at least four members that I think are planning on running for president, plus some governors and others.”

“There’s no incumbent,” he continued, telling Baier it “should be a wide open race and fun for you all to cover.”

Baier then asked directly, “If [Trump] was the party’s nominee, would you support him?”

“The nominee of the party? Absolutely,” McConnell replied.


Mitch McConnell: Biden administration making it easy for GOP to unify

www.youtube.com

The Hill called McConnell’s declaration a “remarkable about-face” by the Kentucky Republican, who has delivered scathing public rebukes of Trump in recent weeks over the former president’s actions surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

Although McConnell voted to acquit Trump on constitutional grounds during the Senate impeachment trial over the House’s charge that the former president incited the insurrection, the minority leader said in a subsequent speech from the Senate floor and in The Wall Street Journal that Trump was responsible for the attack.

Trump reacted with a blistering public statement of his own, calling McConnell an “unsmiling political hack,” and warned Republicans against listening to the longtime GOP leader.

When asked by Baier whether the Republican Party was currently in a civil war, McConnell argued that it was actually the Democrats who are at battle within their own ranks.

“I think if you’re looking for a real civil war, look at the Democrats in the House,” McConnell said. “The progressives make it extremely difficult for Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi (D-Calif.) to operate given the narrow margin she has overall in the House.”

The GOP leader repeatedly refused to engage on questions regarding former President Trump, at one point telling Baier, “What happened in the past is not something relevant now. We’re moving forward.”

Share
Categories
CPAC House Republicans Intelwars Kevin McCarthy Leaders Liz Cheney Presser trump

Watch: ‘Awkward’ moment House GOP leaders take opposite stances on Trump at presser

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (Wyo.) are not on the same page when it comes to former President Donald Trump, as evidenced by them taking opposite stances at the end of a press conference several outlets have described as “awkward.”

What are the details?

McCarthy did not hesitate when asked whether Trump should be speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference this weekend, replying definitively, “Yes he should.”

When asked for her own response to the question, Cheney, the No. 3 GOP House leader replied, “That’s up to CPAC.”

“I’ve been clear on my views about President Trump,” Cheney continued. “I don’t believe that he should be playing a role in the future of the party or the country.”

As Cheney replied, No. 2 GOP House leader Steve Scalise (La.), could be seen shaking his head.

A brief silence ensued, before McCarthy joked, “On that high note, thank you all very much,” ending the presser.


Watch: GOP’s McCarthy And Cheney Disagree At Press Conference Over Trump At CPAC | NBC News NOW

www.youtube.com

McCarthy has remained a loyal defender of President Trump in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which Democrats — and some Republicans, including Cheney — hold the former president responsible for inciting.

But McCarthy has also remained a loyal defender of Cheney, pushing back against fellow Republicans’ calls for her to be removed from leadership after she voted to impeach Trump along with a handful of other GOP House members.

Cheney survived a vote threatening to boot her leadership following her vote, and has dismissed censure from her state party as well as calls for her to resign her seat entirely in the aftermath.

Cheney stays firm on Trump

Meanwhile, Cheney has held her ground on her position that Trump should have no part in the GOP moving forward.

On Tuesday, the Wyoming congresswoman took aim at Trump during an interview with the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute, saying:

“[It’s] incumbent upon everybody who takes an oath of office and swears to protect and defend the Constitution that we recognize what happened on Jan. 6, that we commit ourselves that it must never happen again, that we recognize the damage that was done by the president, President Trump, saying that somehow the election was stolen, making those claims for months and summoning the mob and provoking them then in the attack on the Capitol. And also, and very importantly, in refusing, despite multiple requests from people to ask him to stop what was happening to ask him to stop the violence to protect the Capitol to protect the counting of electoral votes — he didn’t do so.”

Share
Categories
Alex Jones Alex jones banned Andrew Cuomo Capitol riot Change my mind COMEDY Crowder Crowder bits Crowder bits playlist1776 Crowder clips Crowder confronts Crowderbits Cuomo Cuomo brothers Cuomo nusing homes CURRENT EVENTS Election 2020 fake news Funny conservative How to debate How to debunk insurection Intelwars January 6th liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mug club New York New York State news Nursing homes Politics Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder The who trump Video voter fraud WHO Youtube.com

EXCLUSIVE: Alex Jones opens up about Jan. 6 at the Capitol

“I tried to get ahead and stop it but I couldn’t move,” Alex Jones recalled as he opened up about the tragic scene that unfolded Jan. 6 outside the U.S. Capitol.

During an exclusive interview with Steven Crowder, a passionate Alex described reaching the Capitol building in Washington, D.C., where he witnessed “hundreds of thousands” people at a rally with a small group of them breaching the building.

“We are running. We get there and there is tear gas and explosions, and it’s surreal,” Alex said. He recalled using a bullhorn to make the rioters stop but “by that point the crowd could not even hear him.”

Steven asked Alex if he felt responsible [as an organizer of the event] for what happened that day.

Alex said he arrived to find “flash bangs” and “people beating cops” and he was sick over it.

Watch the clip for more from Alex.

Can’t watch? Download the podcast here.

 

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
attack Intelwars Laughed Mitch McConnell Political hack trump

Mitch McConnell ‘laughed’ but doesn’t plan to respond to Trump attack: report

Former President Donald Trump released a scorching statement against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday, lambasting the GOP leader as an “unsmiling political hack” and urging Republicans not to follow the seasoned kingmaker.

But according to a new report, McConnell’s “instant reaction” to the attack was laughter.

What are the details?

CNN chief congressional correspondent Manu Raju reported Wednesday that McConnell not only laughed in reaction to Trump’s criticisms, sources close to the minority leader say he has no plans to acknowledge the message or its author.

“You probably are not going to hear him utter the name Donald Trump ever again,” one source told the outlet. “He’s moving on.”

Prior to Trump’s lengthy rebuke, McConnell delivered a few public criticisms of the former president following the Senate’s second acquittal of Trump in a year. Although the Kentucky Republican voted against conviction on constitutional grounds, he sought to make it clear that he felt Trump’s actions played a significant role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

“There’s no question — none — that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of [Jan. 6.],” McConnell said Saturday from the Senate floor. He made the remark following the 57-43 vote to find Trump guilty of inciting an insurrection, which fell short of the 67-vote threshold needed to convict.

Then, in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, McConnell reiterated that there is “no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility” for the Capitol siege.

In reaction, Trump issued a statement saying that “the Republican Party can never again be respected or strong with political ‘leaders’ like Sen. Mitch McConnell at its helm,” adding that “Mitch is a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack, and if Republican Senators are going to stay with him, they will not win again.”

Worked together on GOP accomplishments

During Trump’s time in the White House, he and McConnell were able to work in tandem on a number of GOP accomplishments, including notably placing more than 200 federal judges into lifetime appointments and filling three U.S. Supreme Court seats.

But even before the latest impeachment trial, the two were pointing fingers at each other over losing control of the Senate after two devastating defeats in Georgia — where the president and his allies alleged ahead of a Jan. 5 runoff that the election system in the state was compromised.

Now, McConnell’s focus is on winning back control of the upper chamber by selecting GOP Senate candidates based on electability, while Trump has vowed to “endorse primary rivals who espouse ‘Making America Great Again’ and our policy of America First.”

Share
Categories
hack IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Mitch McConnell political statement trump

‘Unsmiling political hack’: Trump issues blistering statement against Mitch McConnell

Former President Donald Trump has released a scathing rebuke of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), calling the GOP leader an “unsmiling political hack” and warning Republicans against listening to the longtime lawmaker.

What are the details?

Trump issued a lengthy statement focused solely on attacking McConnell.

It began:

The Republican Party can never again be respected or strong with political “leaders” like Sen. Mitch McConnell at its helm. McConnell’s dedication to business as usual, status quo policies, together with his lack of political insight, wisdom, skill, and personality, has rapidly driven him from Majority Leader to Minority Leader, and it will only get worse. The Democrats and Chuck Schumer play McConnell like a fiddle—they’ve never had it so good—and they want to keep it that way! We know our America First agenda is a winner, not McConnell’s Beltway First agenda or Biden’s America Last.

After blaming McConnell for the GOP losing control of the Senate, the former president argued that “McConnell has no credibility on China because of his family’s substantial Chinese business holdings,” before saying of the minority leader, “Mitch is a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack, and if Republican Senators are going to stay with him, they will not win again.”

Trump’s statement comes after McConnell delivered two public condemnations of Trump for his actions surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters.

The Senate voted over the weekend to acquit Trump after the House impeached him on one charge of inciting an insurrection. Although McConnell himself voted to acquit citing constitutional grounds, he delivered a floor speech following the vote where he declared, “There’s no question — none — that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of [Jan. 6].”

McConnell went on to pen an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal where he defended his vote, but reiterated again that there is “no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility” for the Capitol siege.

However, McConnell attempted to leave the door open for Trump to continue to influence the party at least to some degree, telling The Journal in a separate story, “I’m not assuming that, to the extent the former president wants to continue to be involved, he won’t be a constructive part of the process.”

The finger pointing between Trump and McConnell comes as the GOP has experienced fracturing surrounding Trump’s second impeachment in a year, where Republican members in both the House and Senate joined Democrats in voting to convict the former president.

Trump has reportedly discussed the possibility of breaking away from the GOP to launch his own “MAGA” or “Patriot Party,” but made no mention of that in his statement. Instead, he signaled his intent to continue to influence the Republican Party, writing, “Where necessary and appropriate, I will back primary rivals who espouse Making America Great Again and our policy of America First. We want brilliant, strong, thoughtful, and compassionate leadership.”

Share
Categories
Change my mind COMEDY Conservative twins Crowder Crowder bits Crowder bits playlist1776 Crowder clips Crowder confronts Crowderbits CURRENT EVENTS fake news Food review Funny conservative Hodgetwins How to debate How to debunk Im in the way IMPEACHMENT Intelwars liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Mug club news Not me Pelosi Politics schumer Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder Theyre after you trump Video Youtube.com

Steven Crowder: Impeachment trial is about the First Amendment, NOT Trump

The Senate voted 56-44 on Tuesday to move to a trial to impeach former President Donald Trump. In this clip, Steven Crowder described the trial as an “attack on the First Amendment rather than being about Trump.”

Crowder believes the Democrat Party [and some Republicans] are willing to criminalize conservatives for saying something that is
“unpopular.” He believes the impeachment of a former president is about publicly punishing someone for questioning the system that is in place.

Watch the clip for Crowder’s full impeachment trial assessment.

Can’t watch? Download the podcast here.

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
Confucius institute Intelwars Joe Biden Plan schools trump

Biden quietly scraps Trump plan for US schools to disclose agreements with China-backed Confucius Institutes

The Biden administration has withdrawn a rule proposed by former President Donald Trump’s White House shortly before he left office, which would have required American schools to disclose their agreements with Confucius Institutes — a Chinese language program accused by U.S. officials of spreading communist propaganda fed from Beijing.

What are the details?

The Daily Caller reported that “the Trump administration submitted a proposed rule to the Department of Homeland Security on Dec. 31, 2020, titled ‘Establishing Requirement for Student and Exchange Visitor Program Certified Schools to Disclose Agreements with Confucius Institutes and Classrooms.'”

But the Biden administration rescinded the recently passed Trump policy on Jan. 26 — less than a week after he took office — a spokesperson for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed to Campus Reform.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) tweeted Tuesday in reaction, “It has been a year since the Chinese Communist Party let a pandemic spread around the world. Instead of holding them accountable for hiding the truth, the Biden Admin is rewarding China by allowing their propaganda to infiltrate our college campuses.”

But Newsweek noted the same day that “Trump administration’s foreign mission designation and last-minute executive order on the CI never actually banned the education programs altogether, nor did they issue guidelines on what the programs can and can’t teach.”

The outlet also pointed out that “at least 45 K-12 schools and universities in the U.S. have closed their CI programs in recent years, citing the same concerns about academic freedom and pro-China propaganda.

What’s the background?

Confucius Institutes were branded a foreign mission of the Chinese Communist Party by the Trump administration in August, a claim that has also been made by several Republican lawmakers and other U.S. officials.

David Stillwell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs, told the Associated Press at the time, “We’re not kicking them out. We’re just highlighting the fact that these folks do work for the Ministry of Education of the (Chinese) Communist Party.”

According to The Daily Caller:

Around 500 K-12 schools and 65 colleges in the U.S. have partnerships with the Confucius Institute U.S. Center, a U.S.-based affiliate of the Beijing-based Confucius Institute Headquarters. The institute, also known as Hanban, is affiliated with the Chinese Ministry of Education.

In March 2020, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) issued a letter warning 74 American colleges and school districts that “U.S. Government agencies, including within the Intelligence Community, assert that the Communist Chinese Government uses Confucius Institutes embedded in our academic institutions as a propaganda tool within the United States. Despite these concerns, your institution’s website indicates that a Confucius Institute is active on your campus.”

Share
Categories
Blazetv Chad prather Facebook.com Intelwars trump Video

‘It’s not about Donald Trump’: Chad Prather on why conservatives voted for Trump

Chad Prather shared details from a frustrating conversation he recently had with a friend about Donald Trump.

“I’ve got to get something off my chest!” he declared.

While on a recent four-hour car ride, Chad and his unnamed Republican friend went back and forth after his friend said he hated Donald Trump. According to Chad, after hours of prodding, his friend “could not list a single Trump policy” as the cause for his disdain.

Chad believes that anyone with a conservative platform is not pushing conspiracy theories about Trump. In Chad’s opinion, “It’s not about Donald Trump…conservatives are not living under the illusion that Donald Trump is a saint.”

“Let me tell you why conservatives voted for Donald Trump,” Chad said. Watch the clip for more.

Can’t watch? Download the podcast.

Use promo code CHAD to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Chad Prather?

To enjoy more of Chad’s comedy, craziness and common sense, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Share
Categories
deal Intelwars John matze Parler trump

Ousted Parler CEO John Matze says he didn’t want deal with Trump

Former Parler CEO John Matze says he was against a deal that gave former President Donald Trump partial ownership of the social media firm in exchange for making the site his exclusive platform, disclosing in a new interview that he believes Trump “might have bullied people inside the company.”

What are the details?

Matze, who was terminated by Parler’s board of directors last week, sat down with “Axios on HBO” and confirmed to the outlet that Parler and Trump representatives discussed a potential agreement to serve both parties — but Matze was against it.

Buzzfeed News first reported Friday that Parler was in talks with Trump associates before he left office regarding a proposal that would have granted the Trump Organization “a 40% stake in the company” if Trump would “make Parler his primary social network.”

“I didn’t like the idea of working with Trump, because he might have bullied people inside the company to do what he wanted,” Matze told Axios. “But I was worried that if we didn’t sign the deal, he might have been vengeful and told his followers to leave Parler.”

Buzzfeed reported that the deal was never finalized, but legal experts said the discussions alone, which occurred while Trump was still in office, raise legal concerns.

According to the outlet:

During a subsequent phone interview, Matze told Axios the Mar-a-Lago meeting was set up by Jeffrey Wernick, an early Parler investor and its eventual chief operating officer. He says it lasted a few hours and that he didn’t sleep over at the private club in Florida where Trump now lives.

Matze adds he doesn’t know if the first offer was made by Wernick or by Trump campaign officials.

What’s the background?

Parler has been almost entirely de-platformed after major tech firms Apple and Google pulled the app from cellphones last month and Amazon then refused to provide server hosting for the social networking firm over accusations that the company was not doing enough to moderate content in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Parler became a safe haven for conservative voices since it launched in 2018, by marketing itself as a free speech alternative to censor-loving networks Twitter and Facebook.

The company’s future is not clear, and Matze’s position as chief executive was a casualty as the company works to find a hosting service willing to make it widely available online once again.

Matze told Fox Business he is still not entirely sure why he was let go as CEO from the company he founded.


Former Parler CEO John Matze speaks out on why he was fired

www.youtube.com

Share
Categories
Erratic behavior Intelligence briefings Intelwars Joe Biden Slip trump

Biden says Trump should no longer receive intelligence briefings due to his ‘erratic behavior’

President Joe Biden says he believes former President Donald Trump should no longer receive intelligence briefings—a privilege granted to all former presidents—due to what he called Trump’s “erratic behavior.”

What are the details?

During an interview with “CBS Evening News with Norah O’Donnell” that aired Friday, the host asked Biden, “Should President Trump still receive intelligence briefings?”

“I think not,” Biden replied. When asked to explain, he said, “Because of his erratic behavior unrelated to the insurrection.”

O’Donnell noted, “I mean, you’ve called [Trump] an existential threat, you’ve called him dangerous, you’ve called him reckless.”

Biden responded, “Yeah, I have, and I believe it.”

The Democrat went on to say that while he “would rather not speculate out loud” about any fears he has about Trump receiving further intel, saying, “I just think that there’s no need for him to have the intelligence briefing.”

He the asked rhetorically, “What value is giving him an intelligence briefing? What impact does he have at all, other than the fact he might slip and say something?”


Biden says “no need” for Trump to still receive intel briefings

www.youtube.com

The Hill reported that “the White House said earlier this week that its national security team is conducting a review to determine whether Trump should continue to receive intelligence briefings after having left office,” noting that “CNN reported Thursday that the U.S. intelligence community would review any requests for intelligence briefings from Trump, in keeping with normal practice.”

President Trump is set to undergo a second impeachment trial in the Senate, after the House voted to impeach him for incitement of an insurrection due to his actions surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob of his supporters.

The former president has not wavered in his claim that the Nov. 3 election was “rigged” and stolen from him, and he held a rally ahead of the Capitol siege in protest of the Electoral College results—which were certified by Congress after members resumed the joint session that was interrupted by the deadly attack.

When O’Donnell asked Biden, a former longtime Senator from Delaware, how he would vote on whether to convict Trump were he still in the upper chamber, he refused to answer.

Biden then said of Trump, “Look, I ran like hell to defeat him because I thought he was unfit to be president. I’ve watched what everybody else watched, what happened when that crew invaded the United States Congress. But I’m not in the Senate now. I’ll let the Senate make that decision.”

Share
Categories
IMPEACHMENT Impeachment trial Impeachment witness Intelwars trump Trump testify

Trump team responds to Democrats’ impeachment testimony request: We won’t take part in your ‘public relations stunt’

After Democratic impeachment managers formally requested that former President Donald Trump testify under oath at the Senate impeachment trial next week, Trump’s legal team shot back calling the whole ordeal a “public relations stunt” and “unconstitutional.”

“We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt,” wrote Trump attorney David Schoen in a response letter to lead impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.).

“Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen,” he added. “The use of our Constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games.”

According to the Daily Beast, Trump adviser Jason Miller clarified in a statement to the news outlet, saying, “The president will not testify in an unconstitutional proceeding.”

Raskin had made the request in a letter to Trump and his attorneys on Thursday, alleging that they denied “many factual allegations” in their legal answer to the impeachment charge filed on Tuesday.

“You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense,” Raskin wrote in the letter. “In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021. We would propose that you provide your testimony (of course including cross-examination) as early as Monday, February 8, 2021, and no later than Thursday, February 11, 2021. We would be pleased to arrange such testimony at a mutually convenient time and place.”

Raskin asked that Trump reply with an answer by 5 p.m. Friday.

On Tuesday, Trump’s legal team rebuffed charges laid out by Democrats that he incited the violence at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 or that he attempted to disrupt the counting of Electoral votes. Instead the defense claimed that Trump was acting within his constitutional rights by expressing “his belief that the election results were suspect” and in no way directed his supporters to act violently.

While the formal request by no means requires Trump to testify, it perhaps serves as a sign the Democrats plan to make an aggressive case against him.

However, despite the Democrats’ bluster, the trial is not expected to result in a conviction. Last week, 45 of the GOP’s 50 senators voted to object to impeachment proceedings in a procedural motion, leading Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to call the whole prospect “dead on arrival.” Democrats would need at least 17 Republican senators to vote in support of impeachment to convict Trump.

The Associated Press reported that GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), a staunch ally of Trump, said the letter is nothing more than a “political ploy.”

This week, Graham threatened Democrats against turning the dead-end trial into a lengthy “political commercial” by calling witnesses, warning Republicans would open up “Pandora’s box” and turn the spectacle back on them.

Share
Categories
Congress IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Matt gaetz SEAT trump

Matt Gaetz says he is willing to leave his seat in Congress to defend Trump in impeachment trial

Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz said he would be willing to give up his seat in the House in order to serve on the defense team of former President Donald Trump during his second Senate impeachment trial, should Trump ask him to do so.

What are the details?

During an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room Pandemic” show, Gaetz explained that he and other lawmakers had already floated the idea of volunteering to defend Trump, but were told by the House Ethics Committee they could not so so as sitting members of Congress.

Bannon then asked Gaetz, “Would you then step down from Congress? Would you resign in order to defend the president…the way you want to defend him?”

“I love my district,” the congressman from Florida replied. “I love representing them, but I view this cancelation of the Trump presidency and the Trump movement as one of the major risks to my people both in my district and all throughout this great country.”

“Absolutely, if the president called me and wanted me to go defend him on the floor of the Senate, that would be the top priority in my life,” Gaetz continued, reiterating, “I would leave my House seat, I would leave my home, I would do anything I had to do to ensure that the greatest president in my lifetime—one of the greatest presidents our country has ever had, maybe the greatest president our country has ever had—got a full-throated defense that wasn’t crouched down.”

In reaction to Gaetz’s comments, Democratic Rep. Brendan Boyle (Pa.) joked on Twitter, “I strongly support my colleague Matt Gaetz doing this.”

President Trump was impeached by the House last month on his way out of office, on one charge of inciting an insurrection after a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol building Jan. 6 following a rally where he spoke in protest of the outcome of the election won by now-President Joe Biden.

But the former president hit a stumbling block with his representation.

The Washington Examiner reported:

The former president is being represented by David Schoen and Bruce Castor. Trump announced his new counsel over the weekend after his previous legal team quit, allegedly due to a dispute over legal strategy. The former president supposedly wanted to focus his defense around the promotion of unverified claims of election fraud in the 2020 election, which have been overwhelmingly refuted in court. The attorneys wanted to address the legality of prosecuting a president who has left office.

Share
Categories
IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Mike Rowe trump

WATCH: The never-ending impeachment of Donald Trump. Guest: Mike Rowe

Steven Crowder discusses all the ways the left’s latest attempt to impeach Donald Trump is pathetic. Also, Steven believes if you wear two masks, you are not his friend. All this, and Mike Rowe returns to the show!

Can’t watch? Download the podcast here.

Use promo code LWC to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven’s uncensored late-night comedy that’s actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.

Share
Categories
Dead on arrival IMPEACHMENT Intelwars Rand Paul Senate trump

Rand Paul says impeachment of Trump is ‘dead on arrival’ in Senate—and some Democrats appear to agree

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says the upcoming Senate impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump is “dead on arrival,” now that 45 of the upper chamber’s 50 GOP members are on the record declaring the proceedings unconstitutional.

Some Democrats have indicated that he is right, putting forth alternatives for condemning Trump over allegations that the former president “incited an insurrection” with his actions surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol building by a pro-Trump mob.

What are the details?

On Tuesday, Paul forced a procedural motion objecting to the impeachment trial on the grounds that Trump is no longer a sitting president, and all but five Republican Senators joined him in voting to stop the proceedings.

Paul told Glenn Beck ahead of the move that he knew the trial would move forward, but the actions of Republicans would indicate whether or not there was any chance of conviction in what he has referred to as an “unconstitutional sham.”

The Kentucky Republican had hoped to get 40 of his GOP colleagues to join him, and he actually gained a few more than expected.

He told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo the next day, “We had 45 people, 45 Republican senators say that the whole charade is unconstitutional. So, what does that mean? It means … the trial is dead on arrival.”

“There will be a show,” Paul acknowledged. “There will be a parade of partisanship, but the Democrats really will not be able to win. They will be able to play a partisan game that they wish to play. But it’s all over.”


Senator Paul Explains Impeachment Objection – January 26, 2021

www.youtube.com

One Democratic senator appears to recognize that “it’s all over,” too. The Washington Post reported that Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) is floating to colleagues the “alternative” of censuring Trump, pointing out that the 67 votes needed for a conviction simply aren’t there.

“To do a trial knowing you’ll get 55 votes at the max seems to me to be not the right prioritization of our time,” Kaine told reporters, adding, “The vote on the Paul motion…was completely clarifying that we’re not going to get near 67.”

Nonetheless, Democratic leadership is pushing forward with the trial. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) declared Wednesday:

“Make no mistake, there will be a trial, and the evidence against the former president will be presented in living color for the nation and every one of us to see once again. We will all watch what happened. We will listen to what happened, and then we will vote. We will pass judgment as our solemn duty under the Constitution demands. And in turn, we will all be judged on how we respond.”

H/T: The Washington Examiner

Share
Categories
Commentary Congress Intelwars Mitch McConnell political Politics The U.S. Senate trump

Why Mitch McConnell Backed Away From Trying To Convict Trump

Mitch McConnell really wanted to convict Donald Trump and ban him from ever running for office again, but he was forced to back off.  In fact, he just voted for a motion that declared that convicting Trump at this point would be unconstitutional.  That represents a stunning reversal by McConnell, because earlier this month he was telling other Republicans that he wanted Trump gone.  Putting the pieces together, it appears that McConnell really did try to get to 67 votes so that Trump would be convicted, but political reality forced him to back down in a major way.  Now a weakened McConnell will try to move forward as the minority leader in the Senate, and the future of his political career is very much in doubt.

Once the riot at the U.S. Capitol happened on January 6th, McConnell decided that he was done with Trump and never wanted to speak to him again

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said he never wants to speak to President Donald Trump again following a violent insurrection at the US Capitol on Wednesday, The Washington Post reported.

But of course at that point they had already not spoken for quite some time.

According to McConnell, the last time the two spoke was all the way back on December 15th

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that he hasn’t spoken to former President Trump since the middle of December, confirming news reports that the Senate GOP leader has cut off personal contact with the former president.

“The last time I spoke with him was the day after I declared that Biden had obviously won the election after the Electoral College [voted on] Dec. 14. It would have been Dec. 15,” McConnell told reporters.

Not content to keep his feud with Trump private, McConnell took it to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

When McConnell delivered a speech in which he directly blamed the chaos at the Capitol on Trump, it made headlines all over the nation…

“The mob was fed lies,” McConnell told the chamber, which two weeks earlier had been evacuated as rioters invaded the building. “They were provoked by the president and other powerful people.”

Once it became clear that the House was going to impeach Trump, rumors were running rampant that McConnell was going to back a move to convict Trump in the Senate.

For example, the following comes from a New York Times article entitled “McConnell Privately Backs Impeachment as House Moves to Charge Trump”

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, has told associates that he believes President Trump committed impeachable offenses and that he is pleased that Democrats are moving to impeach him, believing that it will make it easier to purge him from the party, according to people familiar with his thinking.

And CNN reported that a Republican member of Congress actually told them that “Mitch said to me he wants Trump gone”…

The lobbying started in the House after the January 6 attack on the Capitol and in the days leading up to impeachment. But it’s now more focused on Sen. Mitch McConnell, the powerful minority leader who has signaled he may support convicting Trump.

“Mitch said to me he wants Trump gone,” one Republican member of Congress told CNN. “It is in his political interest to have him gone. It is in the GOP interest to have him gone. The question is, do we get there?”

So why did Mitch McConnell change his mind so dramatically?

There are three main reasons.

First of all, it became clear that there wouldn’t be a way to get to 67 votes.  As I warned yesterday, that would probably be enough to force McConnell and his allies to back down.

Voting to convict Trump without succeeding would be political suicide for McConnell and his allies and they know it.

Secondly, Trump was threatening to start his own political party if he was convicted.

The “Patriot Party” would have split the votes of conservatives in every state, and it would have made it absolutely impossible for Republicans to take back control of the House or the Senate in 2022.

In fact, splitting conservatives between the Republican Party and the Patriot Party would have ensured one party rule in Washington for the foreseeable future.

As much as McConnell would like to get rid of Trump permanently, regaining the majority in the Senate is much more important to him.

Thirdly, other Republicans in the Senate were threatening to boot McConnell from his position as minority leader if he voted to convict Trump

“No, no, no,” Sen. Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican and Trump ally, told CNN when asked if he could support McConnell if he voted to convict Trump, calling such a vote a “dangerous precedent” and adding: “I don’t even think we should be having a trial.”

“If you’re wanting to erase Donald Trump from the party, you’re going to get erased,” Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on Fox News Wednesday. “This idea of moving forward without Donald Trump in the Republican Party is a disaster for the Republican Party.”

McConnell is a political survivor, and he could see the writing on the wall.

So he backed off.

But if he could figure out a way to get rid of Trump without any consequences, he would pull the trigger in a nanosecond.

Unfortunately for McConnell, now that everyone knows what he tried to do, he has been greatly weakened politically.

He may survive for a while, but the days remaining in his political career are definitely numbered.

If the Republicans are not able to regain control of the Senate in 2022, I have a feeling that Senate Republicans may decide that it is time for a new standard bearer.

Of course a lot could still happen between now and then, and my regular readers already know that I am not optimistic about America’s future at all.

The rot and decay in Washington is simply a reflection of the rot and decay that is growing throughout our society as a whole.

Our country is literally falling apart all around us, and decades of incredibly foolish decisions by our leaders are now catching up with us in a major way.

***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***

About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com.  In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The EndGet Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned)  By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe.  I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe.  I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article.  The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions.  I encourage you to follow me on social media on FacebookTwitter and Parler, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help.  During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.

The post Why Mitch McConnell Backed Away From Trying To Convict Trump first appeared on End Of The American Dream.

Share