COVER UP FBI foia intelligence failures Intelwars legal action saudi arabia

FBI agent sought CIA help to investigate Sarasota Saudis who fled U.S. before 9/11

The FBI agent who led the post 9/11 investigation of Saudis who moved out of their Sarasota-area home under suspicious circumstances two weeks before the 2001 al Qaeda attacks urged the FBI to seek information from the CIA about whether they assisted the terrorist hijackers. That’s among the final disclosures the FBI made recently to […]

The post FBI agent sought CIA help to investigate Sarasota Saudis who fled U.S. before 9/11 appeared first on 911Truth.Org.

Chuck Schumer Coronavirus relief Donald Trump executive action Intelwars Lawsuit legal action Nancy Pelosi

Democrats will take legal action against Trump to stop coronavirus relief executive action: report

Democrats are expected to take legal action against President Donald Trump for his executive orders aimed at providing Americans with critical economic relief during the coronavirus pandemic.

What’s the background?

Trump took unilateral action late Saturday after negotiations between Democrats in Congress and the White House broke down last week. Democrats were demanding more than $3 trillion tax dollars be spent in the next relief bill, a prospect that Republicans and the White House outright rejected.

According to Politico, Democrats finally shaved $1 trillion from their demands on Friday, but their requests remained bloated at more than $2 trillion. The White House ultimately rejected the alleged compromise.

However, because Congress was heading to recess with no compromise, Trump chose to take action. He signed a series of executive orders that will provide Americans with a $400 supplemental unemployment stipend, defer payroll taxes for Americans who make less than $100,000 annually, extend the federal eviction moratorium, and further defer student loan payments and forgive interest.

What are Democrats expected to do?

According to the Los Angeles Times, Democrats are expected to pursue legal action against the president over the executive orders, putting the relief in jeopardy.

However, it’s unclear whether Trump has the legal authority to make such changes on his own, because the power to collect taxes, spend money and write laws rests with Congress. His orders are expected to face legal challenges from Democrats that could blunt their impact.

In a joint statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) blasted Trump.

“Today’s meager announcements by the President show President Trump still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families. We’re disappointed that instead of putting in the work to solve Americans’ problems, the President instead chose to stay on his luxury golf course to announce unworkable, weak and narrow policy announcements to slash the unemployment benefits that millions desperately need and endanger seniors’ Social Security and Medicare,” they said.

What did Republicans say?

According to Republican leaders, Democrats are not being honest about what caused the failure to pass additional COVID-19 relief.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Democrats “sabotaged backroom talks with absurd demands that would not help working people.”

“Democrats have continued to block all of it while holding out for non-COVID-related liberal demands like a huge tax cut for rich people in blue states and a massive slush fund for state and local governments that is many times the size of the actual coronavirus shortfall they are projected to face,” McConnell said. “Weeks ago, some predicted that Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader Schumer might actually prefer if the American people received no further bipartisan aid before the election. Sadly, they have done nothing to suggest otherwise.”

Though most Republicans applauded Trump’s action, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) released a statement condemning Trump for “lawmaking by executive order.”

“The pen-and-phone theory of executive lawmaking is unconstitutional slop. President Obama did not have the power to unilaterally rewrite immigration law with DACA, and President Trump does not have the power to unilaterally rewrite the payroll tax law. Under the Constitution, that power belongs to the American people acting through their members of Congress,” Sasse said.

COVER UP Intelwars Justice Department legal action saudi arabia unconstitutional

Barr, Grenell block 9/11 families access to evidence with broad, ‘unprecedented’ claims of secrecy

US Attorney General William Barr U.S. Attorney General William Barr and acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell broadly invoked the state secrets privilege this week to block 9/11 survivors and family members from obtaining crucial evidence to support their multi-billion dollar damages lawsuit against Saudi Arabia. In sworn public declarations filed in federal court […]

The post Barr, Grenell block 9/11 families access to evidence with broad, ‘unprecedented’ claims of secrecy appeared first on 911Truth.Org.

Cui bono? Intelwars legal action unconstitutional

Secret Terrorism Watchlist Found Unconstitutional

In the dark, nearly two-decade long history of America’s war on terror certain initiatives stand out. The rendition and torture of suspected terrorists around the world. Drone warfare. Warrantless surveillance of private citizens. And the creation of watchlists, shadowy and opaque in their construction, with devastating consequences for communities caught in the dragnet. In the summer […]

The post Secret Terrorism Watchlist Found Unconstitutional appeared first on 911Truth.Org.