democratic party Intelwars Lauren boebert Politics

Commentary: If I were a Democrat

If I were a Democrat, I’d centralize power in Washington by nationalizing our elections. It wouldn’t be enough to hold all three branches temporarily. I’d need to make it permanent.

So I’d change the rules.

If I were a Democrat, I’d flood the voter pool. I’d require all states to allow same-day voter registration. I’d mandate states automatically register felons, illegal aliens, and 16-year-olds to vote, and I’d require prisons, welfare offices, and ICE to provide their voter registration information.

I’d also use taxpayer dollars to establish aggressive voter recruitment programs at leftist training camps — otherwise known as colleges and universities.

If I were a Democrat, I’d begin a chronicle of lies that all voter verification laws are racist and with that distraction, I’d enable illegal voting.

Banning all voter ID laws would be another important step.

If any local official dared question the eligibility of one of my illegal voters, I would throw them in jail. I would threaten force until no one dared resist.

I’d block efforts to verify signatures and citizenship in the name of counting every vote — not just every legal one. I’d make it more difficult for poll watchers to ensure accountability: citizen oversight is a pest.

I’d make the fraud-ridden mail-in voting of the 2020 pandemic election permanent. To ensure my win on Election Day (or Election Month under our new scheme), I would allow aggressive ballot harvesting to begin 45 days before the election, and I’d count votes received 10 days late in case we need to drum up some missing ballots.

If I were a Democrat, I’d siphon the power of states to the federal government. I’d ignore the Constitution and prevent states from determining their own voting practices. If conservative states did not readily relinquish their authority, I would reduce their representation in Congress and give their electoral votes to my friends in California or New York.

For good measure, I’d strip all state legislatures of their ability to decide how Congressional districts are drawn, and I’d also prohibit states from enforcing their election law.

Next, I’d give D.C. statehood. Now I have the Senate.

If I were a Democrat, I’d marginalize the courts and limit access to challenges. I’d insist that all election lawsuits be processed only by my friends on the District Court in Washington, D.C.

If I were a Democrat, I’d talk about taking money out of politics, but would tax businesses to provide kickbacks and multiply my own campaign war chest by 600%.

If I were a Democrat, I’d be a career politician, so I’d enrich the Swamp while further bankrupting America.

To sweep away any ethics challenges, I’d change the bipartisan Federal Election Commission into a partisan board with a new czar governed by the ruling party — mine.

Now I know these changes are ambitious, and there could be backlash. So I’d silence dissent and cancel free speech. After I controlled the government, I’d want to control the people, so I’d cancel unauthorized thoughts. I’d empower bureaucrats to prosecute individual Americans for posting anything “fact-checkers” deem “misinformation.”

I’d dox and censor anyone who donated to my opponents by having the government publish their personal information. Then I’d weaponize the IRS to strip conservative churches and nonprofits of their tax-exempt status.

If I were a Democrat, I’d use the weight of the federal government to crush anyone who opposed me.

In other words, if I were a Democrat, I’d pass the “For the Swamp Act,” H.R. 1.

But I’m a conservative, and I will never stop fighting for the rights of states, limited government, and election integrity.

Antiliberal authoritarian democratic party Intelwars Left not liberal Rep dan crenshaw military extremism

Dan Crenshaw: The Left is NOT ‘liberal’ — they have become ‘genuinely authoritarian’

Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss the Left’s current efforts to rid the U.S. military of “extremism,” Democrats’ push to separate President Joe Biden from the nuclear codes, and how conservatives can use government to battle the far-left, their policies, and their efforts to control Americans.

Crenshaw called the military’s efforts to rid their ranks of extremism, “so obviously and clearly politically motivated,” as the entire premise is based on reports that some active service members and veterans participated in the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol.

“Mathematically, that’s not a good indication of where active duty military stand or where veterans stand more broadly,” Crenshaw said of the generalization that military personnel are extremists. “And I thought we were against that kind of profiling. Right? I thought that was against the liberal values that supposedly the Left stands for.”

“But, Glenn, you know very well the Left is not liberal,” he added. “The Left is very anti-liberal. And I think as conservatives, we have to say that more often. They have become genuinely authoritarian. Progressivism is not in sync with liberalism. All right? There’s a big difference between an Alan Dershowitz liberal and a Democrat Party progressive. They’re totally different.”

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation with Rep. Dan Crenshaw:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Campaign 2022 Defund the police democratic party Intelwars open borders Scott peters Socialism

House Democrat issues stark warning to own party about 2022: Can’t ‘get caught with our pants down again’

Despite having control of the White House and Congress, some Democrats do not feel comfortable about their position heading into the 2022 midterm elections.

In fact, one House Democrat is already warning that defeat lays ahead for the Democratic Party if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders allow the party’s progressive members to steer the party further to the left beyond what most Americans find palatable.

In a thoughtful interview with liberal think tank NDN, Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) said this week that Democrats cannot “get caught with our pants down again” in 2022.

Rep. Scott Peters. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Despite winning the White House, Peters suggested that Democrats must examine why they lost many seats in the House, explaining that Republicans successfully campaigned against Democrats by pointing out the party’s growing affinity for socialism, defunding the police, and progressive immigration policy.

“We were defined by Republicans in ways that were pretty effective around a couple of issues,” Peters said.

“One was that we were open borders … I think really Democrats are for fixing the immigration laws and then enforcing them,” Peters continued. “You heard that we were for defunding the police. I think part of that was that we never came up with a deal to show what we were for.”

“We also want to concentrate on this attack that we’re socialists, and I think it’s on us to show how markets and capitalism can be put to work for everybody,” Peters explained.

Peters is a vice chairman for the New Democrats Coalition, a congressional caucus of moderate Democrats.

Anything else?

While some Democrats continue to push their party further to the left, other Democrats know exactly why 2020 was not necessarily a longterm win for Democrats, despite now having control of the White House and Congress.

In a Democratic Party conference call after the 2020 election, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), a moderate Democrat, blasted far-left policies, attributing Democrats’ failure to deliver on the promised “blue wave” to some Democrats supporting deeply unpopular policies like “defund the police.”

“We need to be pretty clear,” Spanberger reportedly said on the call, “It was a failure. It was not a success. We lost incredible members of Congress.”

“We have to commit to not saying the words ‘defund the police’ ever again,” she said. “We need to not ever use the words socialist or socialism ever again.”

“If we run this race again we will get f***ing torn apart again in 2022,” Spanberger predicted.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), the No. 3 House Democrat, agrees with Spanberger’s analysis.

Clyburn has said that if Democrats “are going to run on Medicare for All, defund the police, socialized medicine, we’re not going to win” future elections.

Bernie Sanders Covid relief democratic party Intelwars Joe Biden stimulus checks

Bernie Sanders blasts Democrats for ‘unbelievable’ COVID economic relief proposal that moves the goalposts

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders blasted the Democratic Party over the weekend, voicing frustration over Democrats who are moving the goalposts on new coronavirus-related economic relief.

What is the background?

President Joe Biden’s massive $1.9 trillion COVID-related economic relief package includes $1,400 payments, and begins phasing out the payments for individuals who earn $75,000 and couples who earn $150,000.

But as Democrats and Republicans continue negotiating, some Democrats have signaled a willingness to lower the income threshold, meaning fewer Americans would be eligible for the third round of stimulus.

The Washington Post
reported last week that Democrats are considering phasing out the payments for individuals earning $50,000 per year and married couples who earn $100,000 per year. Republicans, however, have countered with a proposal lowering both the income level and the amount of stimulus.

The idea behind lowering income threshold is to target the aid to Americans who need it most. The Post reported that Biden’s administration is open to lowering the income eligibility threshold.

What did Sanders say?

The Vermont senator, technically an independent who caucuses with the Democratic Party, denounced Democrats who are open to lowering the income eligibility limit for the next round of COVID-related stimulus.

In fact, Sanders pointed out that if Democrats agree to lowering the threshold, working class Americans would have received more economic aid under former President Donald Trump than under Biden and the Democrat-controlled Congress.

“Unbelievable,” Sanders, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, tweeted.

“There are some Dems who want to lower the income eligibility for direct payments from $75,000 to $50,000 for individuals, and $150,000 to $100,000 for couples. In other words, working class people who got checks from Trump would not get them from Biden. Brilliant!” Sanders added.

Later tweeting from his official Senate account, Sanders said he “strongly” opposes lowering the income threshold.

“I strongly oppose lowering income eligibility for direct payments from $75,000 to $50,000 for individuals and $150,000 to $100,000 for couples. In these difficult times, ALL working class people deserve the full $1,400. Last I heard, someone making $55,000 a year is not ‘rich,'” Sanders said.

Anything else?

This is not the first time Democrats have moved the goalposts on a third round of economic stimulus.

As TheBlaze reported, Biden and the Democratic Party took flak from their own supporters last month over the $1,400 stimulus check proposal.

That’s because Democrats promised they would pass $2,000 stimulus checks if they took effective control of the Senate by winning both Georgia runoff races last month. In fact, just one day before the runoff elections, Biden promised the checks would be immediately passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress.

However, when Biden released his COVID economic relief plan one week later, it included only $1,400 payments, posturing the $600 payment passed in December under Trump as a “down payment.”

Covid relief Covid stimulus democratic party Intelwars Joe Biden stimulus checks

Biden, Democrats get torched by their own for breaking $2,000 stimulus promise: ‘Never voting D again’

President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party were blasted by their own supporters over the weekend after the Democratic Party made it clear that Biden would be pursuing $1,400 stimulus checks in another coronavirus relief bill — not $2,000 checks like Biden and other Democrats promised.

What are the details?

While campaigning during the Georgia runoff elections, Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, who both won their elections, made COVID relief a central campaign issue.

Biden did, too. While speaking in Atlanta the day before the election, Biden
promised that if Democrats took effective control of the Senate by winning both runoff elections, $2,000 stimulus payments would be distributed to Americans immediately.

However, Biden broke that promise before ever taking office.

As TheBlaze
reported, the details of Biden’s coronavirus relief package were made public about one week before his inauguration. Included in his plan are $1,400 stimulus checks — not the $2,000 checks that he promised. The lower amount is being attributed to the relief package passed in late December, which included $600 stimulus checks. Biden is calling the first check a “down payment” and is adding it to his proposal to achieve the $2,000 promise.

The Democratic Party solidified the lower amount on Saturday when it tweeted Biden’s $1,400 amount.

“@POTUS will build on the $600 down payment provided by Congress last year, sending an additional $1,400 to households across America, totaling direct payments to $2,000 per person,” the Democratic Party said.

What was the reaction?

The message was met with anger by Democrats and Democratic supporters, many of whom pointed out the clear contradiction between the current proposed amount and what was promised by Biden, Ossoff, and Warnock.

One person replied with a picture of a Warnock campaign ad that promised $2,000 checks, saying, “Where does this say $600 down payment + $1400 check?”

Another person pointed to Biden’s own words, which promised $2,000 checks.

  • “i canvassed my ass off for y’all in georgia and you turn around and treat us like we’re stupid,” another person said.
  • “The Democratic party deserves to go extinct,” one person said.
  • Y’all promised $2000 checks if you won the Senate, what’s this ‘down payment’ bulls***? I’m not selling you a car, I’m trying to keep a roof over my head and food on my table,” another person responded.
  • “I can’t believe you’re going to give up a generation of voters over $600 which was already a fraction of what other countries provided for their people,” another person replied.
  • “Build on a $600 down payment provided last year….lmao. Never voting D again,” one person vowed.
  • “People don’t like it when you treat them like they’re stupid,” another person said.
  • “Gaslighting the very people who trusted & voted for you,” another person responded.

With a bipartisan spirit, 10 Senate Republicans wrote Biden over the weekend with a COVID relief counterproposal. Their legislation would reportedly cost just $600 billion to Biden’s $1.9 trillion.

Bernie Sanders Campaign 2022 democratic party Intelwars

Bernie Sanders predicts the Democratic Party could be ‘wiped out’ in the 2022 midterm elections

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent lawmaker who caucuses with Democrats, warned the Democratic Party this week what will happen if Democrats do not improve American lives now that they control the White House, House, and have effective control over the Senate.

What did Sanders say?

Sanders predicted the Democratic Party will be “wiped out” in the 2022 midterm elections if they squander their opportunity to improve American lives.

“Given all that we face, now is not the time to think small. It is time to think big, very big,” Sanders said on Thursday, according to McClatchy reporter Francesca Chambers.

“With Joe Biden as president and Democrats controlling the House and Senate for the first time since 2010, we will be judged on what we deliver for the American people in their time of need. The people want action, not excuses,” Sanders explained.

“And let me be very clear. I have zero doubt that unless we significantly improve the lives of the American people this year, Democrats will get wiped out in the 2022 midterm elections,” Sanders predicted. “That is what happened when Democrats had the House, the Senate and the presidency under Bill Clinton in 1994 and that is what happened under Barack Obama in 2010.”

“Politicians and media focus a great deal on drama, personality and conflict,” Sanders added. “That’s how they define politics. That is not my view. Politics is nothing more complicated than delivering policy that positively impacts the lives of working families.

Of course, Sanders’ vision of what policies are beneficial significantly diverge from the majority of Americans. Sanders is a self-declared “democratic-socialist,” who advocates for European-style socialism.

Indeed, Sanders said this week that he would use his power in the Senate to implement as much of his big government agenda as possible while Democrats control Congress.

Sanders wrote in an essay for CNN:

The Senate’s 60-vote threshold to pass major legislation has become an excuse for inaction. But let’s be clear: We have the tools to overcome these procedural hurdles. As incoming Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, I will use a process known as budget reconciliation that will allow us to pass comprehensive legislation with only 51 votes.

What’s the history of Dem control?

Democrats have a poor history of leveraging control in Washington.

In fact, the last two times that Democrats had control of the White House and Congress — after Bill Clinton’s election in 1992 and Barack Obama’s election in 2008 — Democrats gave up control in the next national election

The 1994 midterm elections were particularly bad for Democrats; they lost control of the Senate, House, a net loss of 10 governorships, and numerous state legislatures. The 2010 midterm elections were equally as bad — coming amid the Tea Party movement — though Democrats managed to retain control of the Senate until the 2014 midterm elections.

democratic party Fox News Gender inclusive Gender language Intelwars Tucker Carlson Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard torches her own party for ‘gender-inclusive’ agenda: ‘Defies basic established science’

Democrat Tulsi Gabbard trashed her own party on Monday over the Democratic Party’s new push for a genderless agenda in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Gabbard was a member of the House until Sunday. She did not seek re-election after running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020.

What’s the background?

As TheBlaze reported, Democrats unveiled proposed changes for the House rules last week, which included eliminating “gendered” language from the rules in exchange for “gender-inclusive” language.

According to House Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern (D-Mass.), “changing pronouns and familial relationships” in the official House rules is necessary in order to “honor all gender identities.”

The genderless agenda became the focus of mockery after Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) ended a prayer in the House chamber on Sunday by saying “amen and a-woman.”

“Amen,” the traditional prayer ending, is a Hebrew word that is completely detached from biological gender. Hebrew is an inflected language, meaning grammatical gender is built into the language. Grammatical gender, of course, is not related to biological gender.

What did Gabbard say?

Speaking with Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Gabbard called the genderless agenda the “height of hypocrisy” and said it reveals how out of touch Democrats are.

“It’s the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the very biological existence of women,” Gabbard said.

“It’s mind-blowing because it shows just how out of touch with reality and the struggles of everyday Americans people in Congress are,” Gabbard added. “It shows that, you know, their first act as as this new Congress could have been to make sure that elderly Americans are able to get the COVID vaccine … but instead of doing something that could actually help save people’s lives, they’re choosing instead to say, ‘Well, you can’t say “mother” or “father” in any of this congressional language.’ It’s astounding.”

The progressive attempt to undermine science by erasing gender amounts to “denying my existence, denying the existence of of biological women,” Gabbard said.

“It defies common sense; it defies basic established science. It just doesn’t make any sense,” she explained.

Tulsi Gabbard rips ‘mind blowing’ House rule changes banning gendered language

Anything else?

The House approved the rule changes on Monday in a vote that went down party lines.

“We made this change for the sake of inclusion, not exclusion,” McGovern said of the language changes, the Hill reported.

Now, instead of words like “mother,” “father,” “son,” “daughter,” “himself,” “herself,” among others, the rules say “parents,” “siblings,” and “themselves.”

Alexandria ocasio-cortez AOC Campaign 2022 Chuck Schumer democratic party Intelwars Jay jacobs New York New york democrats

Top New York Democrat fires warning shot at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez over rumors she will run for Senate

Just days after the 2020 election, Democrats operatives began suggesting that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) should challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in the 2022 Democratic primary.

However, a top New York Democrat is already warning Ocasio-Cortez from launching such a challenge.

What are the details?

Jay Jacobs, chairman of the New York State Democratic Committee, told the New York Post on Saturday that Ocasio-Cortez should slam the brakes on any idea of challenging Schumer for his seat.

“I think it would be a primary driven by ambition more than by need,” Jacobs told the Post.

In fact, Jacobs predicted that Ocasio-Cortez would “absolutely” lose a head-to-head battle against Schumer.

“Chuck Schumer has been a progressive force in the state for decades,” he explained. “She has a constituency that admires her and supports her, and they’re in her community, and I think it would be a loss for them if she were to do that.”

What has AOC said?

When asked about her political aspirations in October, Ocasio-Cortez told Vanity Fair that she does not plan to remain in the House.

“I don’t know if I’m really going to be staying in the House forever,” she said. “I don’t see myself really staying where I’m at for the rest of my life.”

Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez told The Intercept earlier in December that the Democratic Party needs new leadership in Congress, a direct shot at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Schumer.

Pelosi has served in Congress for more than three decades, and Schumer has been in Congress for four decades this January. They have spent a combined three decades in Democratic congressional leadership.

Anything else?

While progressives would love to see Ocasio-Cortez advance their agenda in the Senate, the Democratic Party has become increasingly outspoken against Ocasio-Cortez’s brand of far-left politics.

After the 2020 election, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), a moderate Democrat, blasted far-left politics, attributing the progressive agenda, which includes items like “defund the police,” to Democrats’ election losses.

“We need to be pretty clear,” Spanberger reportedly said. “It was a failure. It was not a success. We lost incredible members of Congress.”

“We have to commit to not saying the words ‘defund the police’ ever again,” she said. “We need to not ever use the words socialist or socialism ever again.”

“If we run this race again we will get f***ing torn apart again in 2022,” Spanberger predicted.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) agreed, saying that if Democrats “are going to run on Medicare for All, defund the police, socialized medicine, we’re not going to win” future elections.

Meanwhile, House Democrats recently snubbed Ocasio-Cortez from a seat on the prized House Energy and Commerce Committee, which would have allowed her to promote her health care and climate policy goals. Democrats chose Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), a moderate Democrat, for the seat instead.

Alexandria ocasio-cortez Chuck Schumer democratic party House of Representatives Intelwars Interviews Nancy Pelosi The Intercept

AOC says it’s time for Dem. leaders Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer to go, cries that some Biden appointees from the Obama era are ‘horrible’

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) says that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) need to vacate their positions in the government and let the younger generation of burgeoning lawmakers take over.

She also said that the Democratic presidential legacy of stacking administrations with previous Democratic appointees and big business heads needs to stop.

What are the details?

In a recently published interview with the Intercept’s Jeremy Scahill, the young congresswoman said that the Democratic Party needs a serious leadership overhaul.

There’s just one problem, she says: Democrats have no idea how to move forward.

“If you create that vacuum, there are so many nefarious forces at play to fill that vacuum with something even worse,” she warned.

“A lot of this is not just about these two personalities [Pelosi and Schumer], but also about the structural shifts that these two personalities have led in their time in leadership,” she explained. “The structural shifts of power in the House, both in process and rule, to concentrate power in party leadership of both parties, frankly, but in Democratic Party leadership to such a degree that an individual member has far less power than they did 30, 40, 50 years ago.”

She also said that Pelosi and other House members need to prepare for what comes after Pelosi retires.

“The left isn’t really making a plan for that,” she said. “So I do think that it’s something that we really need to think about.”

As for the newly minted congresswoman, the speaker position is not something she is ready to tackle — yet.

“The House is extraordinarily complex and I’m not ready,” she admitted. “It can’t be me. I know that I couldn’t do that job.”

What else?

Ocasio-Cortez also took a swipe at the incoming Biden administration and said that the president-elect is stacking the vacancies with former Obama appointees and big business players, calling it “horrible.”

“I think it’s … part of a larger issue that we have right now, which is … the Biden administration is bringing back a lot of Obama appointees, which, depending on where you are in the party, may sound nice, I guess,” she explained. “But I think what a lot of people fail to remember is that we now have a Biden administration that’s bringing back a lot of Obama appointees, but when Obama was making appointments, he was bringing back a lot of Clinton appointees.”

The Intercept reported that “dozens of people” from Goldman-Sachs, McKinsey, Facebook, and Google have “quietly been added to the Biden transition team in recent weeks.”

Ocasio-Cortez explained that those very types of appointments are a “huge reason why we got [President] Donald Trump in the first place.”

“In addition to just the racism that was waiting to be reanimated in this country, [there] was just an extreme disdain for this moneyed political establishment that rules Washington,” she proclaimed.

2020 Election Alexandria ocasio-cortez Allie Allie beth stuckey Allie blazetv Allie stuckey America AOC Biden Biden vs. Trump black Black Lives Matter blaze Blaze podcasts Blaze radio autonomous zone Blaze tv Blazetv Capitol hill autonomous zone Capitol hill occupied protest Change my mind Chaz Chop COMEDY Commentary conservative Conservative commentary Conservative commentator Coronavirus COVID-19 Crowder Crowder confronts CURRENT EVENTS Democrat ad Democrat Party democratic party discussion election Election 2020 fake news Fox Business Fox News Funny conservative George floyd protests Glenn Beck Honest democrat ad Intelwars Joe Biden Learn history liberal libertarian Louder with crowder Lwc Make America Great Again millennial Mug club news parody Pat Pat gray Pat gray podcast Pat gray radio Pat gray unleashed Pat gray videos Pat grey Politicad ad Political comedy political news Political parody Political vlog Political vlogger Politics President Trump Protests Radio Relatable with allie beth stuckey Relatable with allie stuckey reopen america republican republican party Riots Sara gonzales Sara gonzales unfiltered Seattle Socialism Stephen Crowder Steven Crowder TALK RADIO The Blaze TheBlaze trump Trump 2020 Trump vs biden values Video Vlog Vlogger Welcome to braz

VOTE NOW: Which is your favorite BlazeTV Parody video of 2020?

BlazeTV staff members combed through social media pages and channels for the most popular content produced throughout the year. Over the next 12 days, you decide 2020’s standout videos.

Our first category: Best Parody!

Kung Flu Fighting (Parody of ‘Kung Fu Fighting’)

AOC Tells People: Don’t Go Back To Work…Um, WHAT?

An Honest Ad From Your Democratic Party Spokesperson

OBEY: The Woke Party Demands Your Compliance (‘1984’ Parody)

Vote for your favorite parody now!

Want more BlazeTV?

To enjoy more straight talk from BlazeTV’s all-star lineup, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Alexandria ocasio-cortez AOC Campaign 2022 Defund the police democratic party doug schoen Far-left Intelwars

Top Dem pollster has eerie prediction for Democrats if they don’t abandon socialism, ‘defund the police’

Doug Schoen, the longtime Democratic pollster who has worked for the Clintons, has a warning for the Democratic Party if they want to be competitive in upcoming elections: abandon the far-left progressive agenda.

Speaking with the New York Post, Schoen said his data show that Democrats will suffer massive losses in the 2022 midterm elections if they “go the progressive route.”

“The data says to me that if the Democrats go the progressive route they can lose the House and the Senate overwhelmingly in 2022,” Schoen explained.

“The incoming Biden administration has to understand that unless they take a moderate path, that is a likely potential outcome for the Democrats,” he added.

Following last month’s election, Schoen’s polling firm, Schoen Cooperman Research, spoke with 1,000 voters. The respondents overwhelmingly said a Joe Biden presidency should embrace moderate Democratic politics, not the progressive agenda pushed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and her far-left friends.

“The hardcore activists, they like AOC. The rest of the country outside of hardcore party activists are not so keen on AOC or her agenda,” Schoen told the Post. “The question for the Democrats is how to keep the progressives on the reservation without fracturing the party.”

Anything else?

Schoen’s post-election survey found that one policy, in particular, has hurt Democrats: the push to “defund the police.”

This, of course, is no surprise given how angry moderate Democrats, many of whom narrowly won re-election when they thought a “blue wave” was coming, were after the election.

In a post-election House Democrats conference call, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (R-Va.) excoriated the faction of her party that embraces socialism and the “defund the police” agenda.

“We need to be pretty clear. It was a failure. It was not a success,” Spanberger reportedly said of the election. “We lost incredible members of Congress.”

“We have to commit to not saying the words ‘defund the police’ ever again,” she added. “We need to not ever use the words socialist or socialism ever again. It does matter, and we have lost good members because of that.”

“If we run this race again we will get f***ing torn apart again in 2022,” Spanberger predicted.

Even former President Barack Obama has criticized the embrace of “defund the police,” explaining this week that advocating such policy turns off a large swath of the country.

“If you believe, as I do, that we should be able to reform the criminal justice system so that it’s not biased and treats everybody fairly, I guess you can use a snappy slogan, like Defund the Police, but, you know, you lost a big audience the minute you say it, which makes it a lot less likely that you’re actually going to get the changes you want done,” Obama said.

He continued, “But if you instead say, Hey, you know what? Let’s reform the police department so that everybody’s being treated fairly. And not just in policing, but in sentencing, how can we divert young people from getting into crime? And if there was a homeless guy, can maybe we send a mental health worker there instead of an armed unit that could end up resulting in a tragedy?”

“You know, suddenly a whole bunch of folks who might not otherwise listen to you are listening to you,” Obama said.

Cancel culture democratic party Gina carano Intelwars Social Media Star wars: the mandalorian actress Twitter

Cancel mob comes for Disney star after she dares question the election results on social media

Much of social media called for Disney to fire “Star Wars: The Mandalorian” star Gina Carano on Saturday after she had the audacity to question the election results over the weekend.

What are the details?

Carano, a former MMA fighter turned Disney star, shared a meme on Twitter featuring two blindfolded men. The caption said, “BREAKING NEWS: Democratic government leaders now recommends we all wear blindfolds along with masks so we can’t see what’s really going on.”

Following her tweet, hashtag #FireGinaCarano began trending on the social media platform. Many users using the hashtag also copied Disney’s streaming service on the demand.

At the time of this reporting, Carano’s tweet has been liked more than 32,000 times.

In response to the meme, one user wrote, “It’s really disgusting how [Star Wars actors] John Boyega and Kelly Marie Tran were viciously attacked by racist and sexist people, resulting in reduced roles and zero support from Disney, and Gina Carano gets a major role while associating herself with those very same people. #FireGinaCarano.”

Another added, “Gina has has gone all in crazy. That’s okay though, i just don’t want to see it. @Disney #FireGinaCarano.”

“Woah, Gina this is extremely irresponsible. If you are referring to the election, there is no proof of any fraud. If you at referring to mask wearing, we should be doing that and if we all did it we would be able to go outside sooner,” yet another user railed.

What else?

Prior to the offending tweet, Carano appeared to call into question the results of the 2020 presidential election between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden.

In a Nov. 5 tweet, Carano wrote, “We need to clean up the election process so we are not left feeling the way we do today. Put laws in place that protect us against voter fraud. Investigate every state. Film the counting. Flush out the fake votes. Require ID. Make Voter Fraud end in 2020. Fix the system.”

2020 Election democratic party Intelwars Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi refuses to accept responsibility for Dem House losses, claims Facebook isn’t doing enough to suppress stories of voter fraud

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has been taking increasing heat within her own caucus for House Democrats’ dismal showing in the Nov. 3 election, in which they were widely expected to expand their majority and instead appear likely to lose 10 seats or more.

Dissatisfaction with election results may lead Pelosi to face the first serious intra-party challenge to her leadership in the House since she assumed the mantle of lead House Democrat in 2004.

In a news conference Friday, Pelosi appeared to tell reporters about Democratic desires to see another coronavirus stimulus package and omnibus package passed, and instead the assembled reporters appeared more interested in peppering Pelosi with questions about the future of her leadership in the House.

The Hill senior staff writer Scott Wong characterized the exchange, and Pelosi’s testy responses, on Twitter.

Pelosi trotted out a list of excuses, including the assertion that many of the House seats Democrats won in 2018 were in “Trump districts.” She also credited President Trump with turning out the vote in many of those districts.

She also attempted to assuage Democratic fears by pointing out that, if Biden assumes the presidency, the Democratic Party will have “more power.”

When asked point blank about her party’s shrinking caucus, she claimed to be proud of her caucus because, even though it is smaller, it is “beautifully diverse,” bringing to mind the old “Spinal Tap” saw about the things people say when they become less popular.

appeal more selective

She was then asked, point blank, if she took responsibility for Democrats losing seats in the House, and had an … unusual response.

She did, however, note one entity that apparently deserved blame: Facebook. In response to a question about “election interference” that implied that posts questioning the validity of the count in hotly contested states like Pennsylvania and Michigan, Pelosi claimed that Facebook was “part of the problem,” in spite of the platform’s aggressive efforts to “fact check” those stories.

Although conservatives have long complained, with apparent justification, that Facebook targets conservative publications and figures for disproportionate disciplinary actions, Pelosi appears to have bought into the facially implausible line that Facebook actually favors conservatives. The contention appears to be based upon the claim, based on erroneous and dishonestly compiled data, that center-right publications get more traffic on Facebook.

Social media giant Twitter has also aggressively censored suggestions that anything improper happened with either mail-in voting or vote counting, slapping numerous warning labels on tweets from President Donald Trump and outright banning or suspending other users who they claim have violated their policies.

2020 presidential election Anarchists Antifa Black Lives Matter democratic party Intelwars Joe Biden oregon vandalism

‘F*** Biden’: Anarchists spray-paint walls, bust out windows at Democratic HQ in Portland; declare ‘No Presidents’

Just hours after most mainstream media outlets declared Democratic nominee Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 election over President Donald Trump, Biden’s supposed leftist comrades in Portland, Oregon, weren’t celebrating victory.

Instead they busted windows at the Multnomah County Democrats building and spray-painted messages such as “F*** Biden” and “No Presidents” — along with the universal symbol of anarchists.

Image source: Portland police

You hate to see it

Such vandalism — presumably carried out by those who are no fans of Trump — could be cause for concern among Democrats, particularly when it’s taking place in a leftist stronghold like Portland.

Image source: Portland police

It strongly mirrored a similar incident on election night when hundreds of Black Lives Matter protesters shut down the streets of southeast Portland and confronted residents — even ones who backed Biden.
Case in point was a man who stood on his porch and hollered at the protesters, “There’s my Biden sign! Don’t destroy anything! Be peaceful!”

The man’s support for Biden won him no friends among the marauding leftists, one of whom yelled back at him, “No one cares about your white-ass opinion! Who do you think you are telling black people how to protest? You f***ing white-ass privilege old man!”

Another man yelled at protesters, “Dude, I’m on your f***ing side!” — after which a woman screamed back at him, “No, you’re not! No, you’re f***ing not!”

Content warning: Language:

In Washington, D.C., on Saturday,
black-clad demonstrators marched toward Black Lives Matter Plaza and held a large sign that read: “FREE THE PEOPLE, FIGHT THE POWER, F*** THE POLICE – DEFUND, DISARM, DISBAND.” Another sign said: “BURN DOWN THE AMERICAN PLANTATION.”

The group chanted, “What do we want? Justice When do we want it? Now! If we don’t get it — Burn it down! BURN. IT. DOWN!” along with, “F*** Trump! F*** Biden! No more presidents!”

In Detroit, one leftist group wasn’t too thrilled with Biden, either, and chanted, “F*** Donald Trump! F*** Biden too! Both of them don’t give a f*** about you!”

Anything else?

Police arrested three suspects in the aftermath of the vandalism at the Multnomah County Democrats building,
KATU-TV reported:

  • Maximillian Jennings, 22, was booked on first-degree criminal mischief;
  • Thomas Mollrocek, 33, was booked on second-degree criminal mischief and third-degree escape;
  • James Walker Prettyman, 24, was booked on second-degree criminal mischief, the station said.

L to R: Maximillian Jennings, Thomas Mollrocek, James Walker PrettymanImage source: Portland police

All three were booked into jail, KATU reported.

Police said demonstrators gathered outside the building and reportedly started tagging it and shattering windows, the station reported, adding that officers moved in and made targeted arrests of those who allegedly were part of the vandalism.

Image source: Portland police

Here’s a clip of the damage. (
Content warning: Spray-painted F-bomb. No one claims leftists are poor spellers):

2020 presidential election democratic party Intelwars Jennifer Rubin Joe Biden President Donald Trump republican party Twitter voter fraud

Long list of media, Democrats threaten retribution against Trump supporters, Republicans

Journalist Drew Holden shared a lengthy — and alarming — list of media outlets, fellow journalists, and members of the Democratic Party who are threatening retribution against Republicans supporting President Donald Trump and his allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and more.

Holden concluded the lengthy list — which you can read in its entirety herewriting, “At the end of the day, I can’t imagine these folks will be shipping conservatives off to the gulags in a divided government, much as they would like to.

But it fundamentally cuts against the spirit of America to suggest someone should be punished for their political views.”

“We are not some post-genocide society,” he added. “The suggestion that we need a Rwandan-styled Truth and Reconciliation Commission is preposterous. And free societies don’t develop political hit lists.

This champagne fascism from the Left needs to stop. Now would be a good time.”

What are the details?

Holden on Saturday
tweeted, “With Biden having been declared the winner (for now) by major media outlets, I figured it would be a good time to share some of the people who’ve threatened retribution against Trump supporters.”

“The list,” he added, “is a lot longer than I had anticipated it would be.”

Those on the list included former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, who
wrote, “When this nightmare is over, we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, comfort those who have been harmed by his hatefulness, and name every official, politician, executive, and media mogul whose greed and cowardice enabled this catastrophe.”

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes
added, “The most humane and reasonable way to deal with all these people, if we survive this, is some kind of truth and reconciliation commission.”

The Nation magazine published a commentary on the subject
titled “We’re Going to Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to Recover from Trump.”

The Philadelphia Inquirer published a similar piece
titled “What Brings U.S. together in ’21? A Truth Commission? Or Something Else?”

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) was at least one Democratic politician calling for a list as well.

wrote, “Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future.”

Further, the Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin said Republicans supporting President Donald Trump’s allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election should be ejected from polite society.

On Friday, Rubin — a “conservative” opinion columnist for the Post —
tweeted, “Any R now promoting rejection of an election or calling to not to follow the will of voters or making baseless allegations of fraud should never serve in office, join a corporate board, find a faculty position or be accepted into ‘polite’ society. We have a list.”

In 2019, Rubin called for the Republican Party to ‘burn down’

During a panel discussion on MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” Rubin said that if any Republicans were in office by the time President Donald Trump vacated the White House, the remainder of the party should be razed — with no survivors.

“It’s not only that Trump has to lose, but that all his enablers have to lose. We have to collectively in essence burn down the Republican Party,” Rubin explained at the time. “We have to level them because if there are survivors, if there are people who weather this storm, they will do it again. They will take this as confirmation that, ‘Hey, it just pays to ride the waves. Look at me. I made it through.’ And so up and down the ticket, federal, state, and local offices, the country has to repudiate this.”

This time, Rubin made the remarks in response to the news that former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer was joining the cast of “Dancing with the Stars.”

Again, Rubin used the “polite society” argument.

“What we should be doing in shunning these people,” Rubin insisted in her remarks. “Shunning, shaming these people is a statement of moral indignation that these people are not fit for a polite society. I think it’s absolutely abhorrent that any institution of higher learning, any news organization, or any entertainment organization that has a news outlet would hire these people.”

Alexandria ocasio-cortez AOC Campaign 2020 democratic party Intelwars Progressive Socialism

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez lashes out at Democratic Party, hints at quitting politics

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the progressive firebrand who cruised to re-election last week, suggested in a new interview that she might be on her way out of politics.

What did Ocasio-Cortez say?

Speaking with the New York Times, Ocasio-Cortez said she might depart from politics as it becomes even more clear that her far-left progressive agenda is not welcome in the Democratic Party.

When asked if she is considering a Senate run in the next couple of years, Ocasio-Cortez said, “I genuinely don’t know.”

“I don’t even know if I want to be in politics. You know, for real, in the first six months of my term, I didn’t even know if I was going to run for re-election this year,” she added. “It’s the incoming. It’s the stress. It’s the violence. It’s the lack of support from your own party. It’s your own party thinking you’re the enemy.”

She continued, “But I’m serious when I tell people the odds of me running for higher office and the odds of me just going off trying to start a homestead somewhere — they’re probably the same.”

Ocasio-Cortez spent much of the interview lashing out at the Democratic Party for not accepting her brand of ultra-left politics, claiming that progressive policies are winning elections — not losing them.

She said:

I’ve been begging the party to let me help them for two years. That’s also the damn thing of it. I’ve been trying to help. Before the election, I offered to help every single swing district Democrat with their operation. And every single one of them, but five, refused my help. And all five of the vulnerable or swing district people that I helped secured victory or are on a path to secure victory. And every single one that rejected my help is losing. And now they’re blaming us for their loss.

So I need my colleagues to understand that we are not the enemy. And that their base is not the enemy. That the Movement for Black Lives is not the enemy, that Medicare for all is not the enemy. This isn’t even just about winning an argument. It’s that if they keep going after the wrong thing, I mean, they’re just setting up their own obsolescence.

Speaking specifically about how the Democratic Party establishment has reacted to her progressive politics, Ocasio-Cortez said, “The last two years have been pretty hostile. Externally, we’ve been winning. Externally, there’s been a ton of support, but internally, it’s been extremely hostile to anything that even smells progressive.”

What are Democrats and media saying?

Moderate Democrats, however, do not share Ocasio-Cortez’s sentiment. House Democrats participated in a conference call last week, where they lamented on losing many seats on Election Day and blamed progressive politics for those losses, the New York Times reported.

Meanwhile, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough said Friday that the election was an “absolute repudiation” of the Democratic Party’s vision for America.

“There is no way to put this other than to say … Joe Biden winning looks like a one-off. This election for the most part was an absolute repudiation of the Democratic Party as a brand. Their brand doesn’t work across most of America. It just doesn’t,” he said.

Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang also sounded the alarm that if the Democratic Party doesn’t change course now, they’re going to continue losing elections.

Campaign 2020 democratic party Intelwars Joe Scarborough

MSNBC host hits Dem Party with hard reality check over election results: ‘An absolute repudiation’

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough gave the Democratic Party a reality check that will probably go ignored after the media declared former Vice President Joe Biden the president-elect.

What’s the background?

Although Biden is the likely winner of the election, Democrats suffered significant losses outside of the presidential contest. Not only did Republicans cut into the Democratic majority in the House, but Republicans will likely maintain their majority in the Senate, and Republicans made gains on the state level in New Hampshire and Alaska.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump and the Republican Party made significant gains among most demographic groups.

As TheBlaze reported, Trump’s support among Hispanic Americans, women, black Americans, Asian Americans, and generally most demographic groups increased this year compared to 2016. He only performed worse among white men, which is Trump’s strongest demographic group.

What did Scarborough say?

The MSNBC host said the election’s results were a “repudiation” of the far-left Democratic agenda that the party’s most liberal lawmakers want to force on America.

Scarborough’s comments were made on his show “Morning Joe” Friday morning before the media declared Biden the election winner.

“I’ve got to put a sidebar in here because after the dust settles, if Joe Biden ends up winning the presidency, then I think a lot of people are going to turn to what happened to the Democratic Party,” Scarborough said, Fox News reported.

“There is no way to put this other than to say … Joe Biden winning looks like a one-off. This election for the most part was an absolute repudiation of the Democratic Party as a brand. Their brand doesn’t work across most of America. It just doesn’t,” he continued.

“They got routed in Senate races they should have won. And I mean, and if you don’t believe me, just look back at all the predictions. Are Democrats going to win nine, 10, 11 Senate seats? The House results are perhaps even more shocking. Nobody thought that this was going to be close. The weekend before the election, Republican pollsters were talking about hemorrhaging support in suburbs and couldn’t believe the numbers. They said, ‘We’re going to get destroyed.’ Well, it ended up [that] they couldn’t believe the numbers for a good reason. The numbers were wrong!” Scarborough said.

The MSNBC host went on to say that he has spoken to experts who predict that “Republicans are going to have a huge year in 2022” if “Democrats don’t correct course.”

Anything else?

Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang is also sounding the alarm that, despite likely winning the White House, Democrats are losing overall.

Yang explained on CNN that the Democratic Party has a “fundamental problem” — they’re focused on identity politics, not the working-class.

“There’s something deeply wrong when working-class Americans have that response to a major party that theoretically is supposed to be fighting for them, so you have to ask yourself what has the Democratic Party been standing for in their minds?” Yang said.

“And in their minds the Democratic Party, unfortunately, has taken on this role of the coastal urban elites who are more concerned about policing various cultural issues than improving their way of life, that has been declining for years.” he explained. “And so if you’re in that situation, this to me is a fundamental problem for the Democratic Party because if they don’t figure this out, then this polarization and division will get worse not better.”

Yang predicted that if the Democratic Party does not turn course, then it will result in “continued acceleration towards the institutional mistrust that animated the Trump vote and will continue to do so.”

democratic party Dumpster fire election house democrats Intelwars Pelosi

‘It’s a dumpster fire’: House Democrats reportedly pointing fingers after stunning election losses

There was a significant amount of infighting and finger-pointing going on among Democrats in the House of Representatives Wednesday as the majority suffered a stunning defeat all across the country on Election Day, Politico reported.

Only days before, the outlet noted, top Democrats including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) mused about the party’s chances to expand their majority in the chamber by up to a dozen seats. Polls in races around the nation showed Democrats up overall and making plays in Republican strongholds like Texas.

But as votes began to pour in Tuesday, Democratic hopes and dreams were quickly dashed. TheBlaze’s Chris Pandolfo noted that “Republicans won upset victories over several Democratic incumbents” and are poised to “gain as much as 10 seats in a year the media raised the possibility they’d lose as many as 15 or more.”

Consequently, the mood among Democrats around Capitol Hill was much less chipper and several members began pointing fingers. Here’s more from Politico:

Even with tens of thousands of ballots still to be counted, shell-shocked Democratic lawmakers, strategists and aides privately began trying to pin the blame: The unreliable polls. The GOP’s law-and-order message amid a summer of unrest. The “hidden Trump voters.” The impeachment hangover. The lack of a coronavirus stimulus deal.

Some corners of the party were also beginning to question the message and tactics at the top, with several Democrats predicting — and some even demanding — a significant overhaul within the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, including possibly even ousting chairwoman Cheri Bustos, whose Illinois race has yet to be called.

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) told reporters, “There’s still a lot of uncertainty. I would say the high expectations that a number of pollsters and pundits created obviously have not been met. We’ll have a Democratic majority in the House, and it remains to be seen how big that will be.”

But some lawmakers were far less subtle: “It’s a dumpster fire,” said one Democrat, who remained anonymous.

Rep. Henry Cuellar, a senior Blue Dog Democrat in South Texas pointed to his party’s failures in rural areas outside big cities.

“If we don’t change the strategy, it’s going to be the same in 2022,” he predicted.

There is reportedly speculation that Pelosi’s leadership is in question ahead of Congress’ return after the election. A poor performance during the 2020 general election might finally spark a change at the top for Democrats.

Barack Obama Campaign 2020 cenk uygur democratic party Donald Trump Intelwars Joe Biden

Left-wing ‘Young Turks’ host melts down over lack of blue wave, lashes out at Democrats — and Obama

Liberal commentator Cenk Uygur, who founded “The Young Turks,” melted down during his network’s coverage of the election, lashing out at the Democratic Party establishment for failing to deliver on that “blue wave” that they spent months boasting about.

If fact, Uygur even took aim at former President Barack Obama.

What happened?

The far-left progressive host exclaimed that establishment Democrats need to clear the way for non-moderate Democrats, pointing to Tuesday’s close results as evidence that establishment Democrats are out-of-touch.

“Get out of the way — both Jake Tapper and Nancy Pelosi and every editor at the New York Times — has to get out of our way!” Uygur pleaded.

“Let us hit the Republicans in the face! Instead of playing patty cakes with them,” Uygur continued. “How many elections are we going to get to a razor’s edge with a monster idiot fascist like Donald Trump?”

“One last thing on this: Forget [Trump] being a racist, forget him being a fascist… the guy’s IQ is lower than 70 — he’s an idiot!” Uygur went on to say. “He’s a total moron! And you couldn’t figure out how to crush him in an election? Man, the corporate Democrats and mainstream media suck at this. They absolutely, positively suck, and they brainwash smart people into compliance.”

Later, Uygur said that Democrats “definitively screwed up” because they did not win in a landslide.

What did he say about Obama?

After voicing frustration because the Democratic establishment selected Joe Biden over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to challenge President Donald Trump, Uygur said Obama is “massively responsible” for Biden’s narrow victory or loss.

“No one in the media will ever let you say that. If you say that in media, you’ll be banned,” Uygur said. “The rest of the media will ban you if you say one unkind word about Barack Obama. And in fact, they will accuse you of being a racist — he’s their corporate shield.”

Uygur went on to blast Obama for barely campaigning on Biden’s behalf.

“Now I understand coronavirus and all that, but you don’t have to sit in your basement or your yacht all election and wait until a week before the election to do anything,” Uygur said.

“So would Obama be partly responsible? He’d be a giant part of the responsibility of losing,” he added.

2020 presidential election Christian voters democratic party evangelicals Intelwars Kirk Cameron President Donald Trump

Kirk Cameron says evangelical Trump supporters are waking up to see ‘socialism and communism’ knocking on their doors — and they’re rallying to stop it

Conservative Christian actor Kirk Cameron says that evangelicals are rallying to vote for President Donald Trump because they can clearly see “socialism and communism” at the door.

What are the details?

In an interview with Fox News‘ “America’s Newsroom,” Cameron said that people of faith are worried that the country will descend into socialism or communism if a Democrat is elected president.

“I see people of faith waking up to the scary idea that socialism and communism are knocking on our doors this Halloween season, and they’re disguised in the costumes of public health and social justice,” Cameron said.

Cameron, an entertainer outspoken about his faith, added that the enthusiasm for President Donald Trump is staggering.

“I can tell you that as I travel the country and teach in churches, I’m seeing a couple of things that are just astounding. … The enthusiasm level for people going out and rallying for a presidential election is unbelievable: 96-mile car trains, 30,000 vehicles, 58,000 people in Pennsylvania. Regardless of the side of the aisle you’re on, this enthusiasm level is unprecedented.”


Fox News reports that Cameron and other evangelical Trump supporters held an event titled “Non-Essential” in order to rally the more than 40 million inactive Christian voters to cast a ballot for the president on Tuesday.

During the interview, the California resident also pointed to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) as an example of what “non-essential” also means.

“Our governor just deemed going to church non-essential and Thanksgiving, with all my grown children in my living room, non-essential,” he added.

Anything else?

In October, Cameron told the Christian Post, “I think if someone had said to us six months ago, ‘There’s a virus that’s going to shut down every business, you’re not going to be able to go to church for Easter, and your kids are not going to graduate from high school and they can’t even start back in school in the fall,’ I think we would have said, ‘That’s nuts. You’re crazy. What kind of conspiracy theory person are you?’ And here we are today with just everything upside down.”

... 2020 democrats 2020 Election 2020 elections 60 Minutes blaze Blaze podcasts Blaze tv Blazetv Commentary conservative Conservative commentary Conservative News democratic party election Harris Intelwars Joe Biden Kamala Kamala Harris news Pat Pat gray Pat gray radio Pat gray unleashed Pat gray videos Pat grey Pat unleashed Pathhead Policy Politics Progressive Radio TALK RADIO TheBlaze USA Video

Kamala Harris says she will NOT bring socialist policies to a Biden administration

“60 Minutes” correspondent Norah O’Donnell pressed Sen. Kamala Harris on her reputation of being considered “the most liberal United States senator.”

In this clip, Pat Gray discussed the interview, and how O’Donnell pushed Harris about being a socialist.

“As we’ve said multiple times, [Kamala Harris] is the most liberal person, the most progressive senator we had in all of the Senate,” Pat said, “including Bernie Sanders, including Elizabeth Warren.”

O’Donnell sought clarification on whether Harris would support the policies of running mate, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Harris noted that Biden did not share her support for socialist policies, including the Green New Deal and legalizing marijuana.

“Are going to bring those progressive policies — that you supported as senator — into a Biden administration,” O’Donnell asked.

In Harris’ response, she claimed part of a deal she made with Biden was to share her lived experience and give an honest perspective on policy matters.

“And is that a socialist or progressive perspective?” O’Donnell asked.

Harris said she would not bring a socialist perspective to the table. Harris added that she would not have joined the Democratic ticket if she didn’t support Biden’s vision for America.

For more interview details, click here.

Pat commented on the bizarre interview and gave his opinion of Harris’ denial of being a socialist.

Watch the video for more.

Use promo code PAT to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

... 2020 democrats 2020 Election 2020 elections 60 Minutes blaze Blaze podcasts Blaze tv Blazetv Commentary conservative Conservative commentary Conservative News democratic party election Harris Intelwars Joe Biden Kamala Kamala Harris news Pat Pat gray Pat gray radio Pat gray unleashed Pat gray videos Pat grey Pat unleashed Pathhead Policy Politics Progressive Radio TALK RADIO TheBlaze USA Video

Kamala Harris says she will NOT bring socialist policies to a Biden administration

“60 Minutes” correspondent Norah O’Donnell pressed Sen. Kamala Harris on her reputation of being considered “the most liberal United States senator.”

In this clip, Pat Gray discussed the interview, and how O’Donnell pushed Harris about being a socialist.

“As we’ve said multiple times, [Kamala Harris] is the most liberal person, the most progressive senator we had in all of the Senate,” Pat said, “including Bernie Sanders, including Elizabeth Warren.”

O’Donnell sought clarification on whether Harris would support the policies of running mate, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Harris noted that Biden did not share her support for socialist policies, including the Green New Deal and legalizing marijuana.

“Are going to bring those progressive policies — that you supported as senator — into a Biden administration,” O’Donnell asked.

In Harris’ response, she claimed part of a deal she made with Biden was to share her lived experience and give an honest perspective on policy matters.

“And is that a socialist or progressive perspective?” O’Donnell asked.

Harris said she would not bring a socialist perspective to the table. Harris added that she would not have joined the Democratic ticket if she didn’t support Biden’s vision for America.

For more interview details, click here.

Pat commented on the bizarre interview and gave his opinion of Harris’ denial of being a socialist.

Watch the video for more.

Use promo code PAT to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Cynical theories democratic party Former never-trumper Intelwars James lindsay New discourses

Former never-Trumper James Lindsay on why he just CAN’T vote for Joe Biden

This is a moment “Cynical Theories” author James Lindsay probably hoped would never come. The liberal mathematician and host of the “New Discourses Podcast” recently came out as “unhappily” voting Republican, including for President Donald Trump, because the Democratic Party is now being controlled by a far-left movement that seeks to destroy our country and the U.S. Constitution.

He joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to explain why this election isn’t “Trump versus Biden.” It’s Trump versus a “movement that wants to tear apart American society at its very foundation.” Lindsay warned that if it isn’t stopped, the left can toss out our rights by rewriting the Constitution — or abolishing it altogether.

“A lot of people don’t understand what’s happening with the election we have right now,” he said. “They think it’s a choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. And at the surface level, of course, it is. We’re voting for each candidate to be duly put into the office of president. But that’s not what we really have going on. We have, in Donald Trump, a man who’s going to govern as we’ve all seen — the way he feels like he’s going to govern. And we have in Joe Biden, a man captured by a movement that wants to tear apart the American society at its very foundation.”

Lindsay noted the popular leftist narratives that call to “abolish anything they don’t like,” which now includes the U.S. Constitution. He added that “this is the movement that is controlling the Democratic Party.”

“It is my belief, that there has been a largely effective kind of silent coup of the Democratic Party, that’s turned it completely under the control of this movement. And that’s what we’re going to be electing with Joe Biden. So I can’t do it,” he said.

Watch the video below for more details:

democratic party Election 2020 Foreign Policy Intelwars Joe Biden Russia Vladimir Putin

Russian President Putin favorably compares Biden and Democrats to Soviet Communists

Russian President Vladimir Putin favorably compared presidential candidate Joe Biden and the Democratic Party to Soviet communism in an interview with the Rossiya TV channel released Wednesday.

Putin once again denied that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. election and pledged to work with whomever wins the 2020 election, Newsweek reported. But he favorably remarked on the Democratic Party’s ideology, comparing it to the old Soviet Union’s Communist Party, and said those shared values may be a “basis for developing contacts” with Biden should he win the White House.

“The Democratic Party is traditionally closer to the so-called liberal values, closer to social democratic ideas,” Putin said. “And it was from the social democratic environment that the Communist Party evolved.”

“After all, I was a member of the Soviet Communist Party for nearly 20 years,” Putin added. “I was a rank-and-file member, but it can be said that I believed in the party’s ideas. I still like many of these left-wing values. Equality and fraternity. What is bad about them? In fact, they are akin to Christian values.

“Yes, they are difficult to implement, but they are very attractive, nevertheless,” he continued. “In other words, this can be seen as an ideological basis for developing contacts with the Democratic representative.”

Putin also noted the Soviet Union rhetorically supported the civil rights movement for black Americans and suggested this is another common value he shares with the American left-wing in the context of Black Lives Matter protests in the United States.

Black Americans “constitute a stable electorate” for Democrats, Putin said. “The Soviet Union also supported the African Americans’ movement for their legitimate rights.”

He also tied the civil rights movement to communist ideology.

“Back in the 1930s, Communist International leaders wrote that both black and white workers had a common enemy — imperialism and capitalism. They also wrote that these people could become the most effective group in the future revolutionary battle,” Putin said.

“So, this is something that can be seen, to a degree, as common values, if not a unifying agent for us,” he explained. “People of my generation remember a time when huge portraits of Angela Davis, a member of the U.S. Communist Party and an ardent fighter for the rights of African Americans, were on view around the Soviet Union.”

Although Putin noted Biden has used “sharp anti-Russia rhetoric” against Russian election meddling and Russia’s foreign policy, he specifically identified nuclear arms control as an area he’s ready to partner with Biden, should the Democratic candidate win.

“Candidate Biden has said openly that he was ready to extend the New START or to sign a new strategic offensive reductions treaty,” Putin said. “This is already a very significant element of our potential future cooperation.”

He reiterated his willingness to work with Trump or Biden, whomever wins.

“I would like to repeat what I have said more than once before. We will work with any future president of the United States, the one whom the American people give their vote of confidence,” Putin said.