Categories
Bad court rulings census Courts Executive Orders Illegal Immigration Intelwars

Horowitz: Courts finally clamp down on executive actions … that deal with illegal aliens

It’s almost as if the courts have been abolished. One governor after another has crushed our foundational liberties with impunity because of an unprecedented approach to confronting a respiratory virus. Every aspect of our lives and liberty has been stripped or thrown into chaos based on the capricious whims of executive fiat. Almost no court has intervened to protect the Bill of Rights. In comes a panel of judges for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals last Thursday and finally puts a stop to executive orders … but only as they relate to illegal aliens, not American citizens!

We now live in a country where American citizens have no right to open a business or to breathe free air without a mask, but illegal aliens have a right to be counted in the census and distort citizen representation! State governors can place interstate travel bans and restrictions on Americans in other states, but the president of the United States cannot prevent foreign nationals from breaking into the country and must even use their very presence in the country and their unilateral choice of state residency to add to the electoral totals of states like California. Welcome to the Twilight Zone.

After the president was rebuffed by the courts in his attempt to count the number of U.S. citizens in the census, his backup plan was to at least discount those foreign nationals who are in the country illegally. On July 21, he released a memorandum instructing Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to supply the requisite information needed to ensure illegal aliens aren’t counted in the census. After all, isn’t one purpose of a census to know how many people can vote in a given area?

Yet, as we are being quarantined against our will and toddlers are being forced to mask up without any recourse in the court system, illegal aliens always get immediate representation in the courts. At the behest of New York’s government, the Second Circuit issued an injunction on the order, claiming that the president engaged in “an unlawful exercise of the authority granted to the President.” Suddenly, the courts are concerned with executive fiat that affects our lives!

Two of the three judges — Richard Wesley and Peter Hall — are Republican appointees. This is yet another case of Republican-appointed judges handing civilization-changing victories to the Left, a result that never occurs the other way around from Democrat-appointed judges.

The twisted irony about New York obtaining standing in this case and ultimately prevailing is that the reason why immigration policy was given over to the federal government was precisely to ensure that states don’t admit undesirable aliens as a means of juicing up their representation in the national government. But that is exactly what states like New York and California are doing. They get to thwart federal law, thanks to numerous court rulings, and criminalize the enforcement of immigration law, thereby ensuring that illegal aliens are incentivized to come to their states. Then they turn around and demand they be counted. Talk about benefiting from the fruits of the crime!

As I’ve noted before, even if the dictate of the 14th Amendment to count “whole persons” compelled us to count immigrants, it could not encompass those who entered without consent. Our courts have stated in an interrupted stream of case law that any alien not legally admitted to the country is as if he is literally standing outside our boundary. “The petitioner, although physically within our boundaries, is to be regarded as if he had been stopped at the limit of our jurisdiction, and kept there while his right to enter was under debate,” states the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Ju Toy, 1905.

The same way one doesn’t need a reinterpretation of the Constitution to recognize that illegal aliens cannot be counted, one doesn’t need an update of statute either. As John Noonan, former Ninth Circuit judge, said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1985, “If there was an invading army on American soil, one does not suppose the Bureau of Census would count the enemy troops.”

How sad that a clause of the 14th Amendment designed to ensure that black Americans were not disenfranchised is now being used to disenfranchise all Americans in favor of foreign invaders.

This ruling comes just days after a California judge ruled that the president cannot end the counting of the census itself this month and must continue it into October. Now judges apparently control all executive functions, and there is no pushback from the executive branch or an effort to draw the line on separation of powers.

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Minnesota ruled that a Somali immigrant who had provided aid to al-Shabab must be released early because of the virus. At the same time, a Los Angeles judge ruled that a pastor couldn’t hold services indoors, again, because of that same virus.

Oh, and remember how almost no businesses owner won in court the right to keep their businesses from arbitrarily being deemed unessential by government? The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which was supposedly made more conservative by Trump, ruled against Oklahoma City’s anti-panhandling law. Blocking traffic and harassing motorists at highway medians is deemed a First Amendment right and is evidently essential during the virus, but a gym owner who tries to keep his business open is arrested.

See a pattern here of which “rights” are upheld and which ones are repudiated?

One thing is clear: The courts are worse than ever, despite the promise for change. They have failed to protect a single legitimate constitutional right. As such, why should society and other branches of government feel compelled to abide by their concoction of novel “rights” that would have shocked the consciences of our Founders?

Share
Categories
census Congressional apportionment Illegal aliens census Intelwars Trump census Trump memo

New Trump memo omits illegal aliens from census count used to determine House seats

President Donald Trump signed a memorandum Tuesday aiming to exclude the illegal immigrant population from the 2020 census apportionment base used to determine how many House seats each state will have.

“For the purpose of the reapportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census, it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status,” the president wrote in the memo, arguing that the new policy “is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy.”

Under the new guidelines, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and census officials are directed to provide the president with the total number of undocumented immigrants living in the United States, at which point the president can exclude that number from the apportionment base.

The memo argues that the Constitution “does not specifically define which persons must be included in the apportionment base.” It suggests that the illegal immigrant population should be categorized similarly to other groups — such as those who are in the country only temporarily for business or tourism, or foreign diplomatic personnel — that are not counted in the apportionment base.

“My administration will not support giving congressional representation to aliens who enter or remain in the country unlawfully, because doing so would create perverse incentives and undermine our system of government,” Trump said in a statement announcing the new policy.

What’s the background?

President Trump has been working diligently to include citizenship data in the 2020 census. Last year, his administration attempted to include a citizenship question in the census, but that move was effectively blocked by the Supreme Court.

After the citizenship question effort stalled out, Trump directed the Department of Commerce in an executive order “to strengthen its efforts, consistent with law, to obtain State administrative records concerning citizenship.”

As a part of that effort, the administration began reaching out to individual states in order to arrange data-sharing agreements. As of last week, the administration had entered such agreements with four states — Iowa, Nebraska, South Carolina, and South Dakota — which agreed to share driver’s license and state identification information.

Democrats are furious

Immediately following its announcement, Democrats in Congress slammed the memo and promised a legal fight.

Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer chalked it up as an unconstitutional attempt to disparage immigrant communities.

Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi similarly promised to contest the move, calling it “unconstitutional and unlawful.”

Democratic members of the House Oversight Committee, including Chair Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), announced that they would hold an emergency meeting next week to discuss a plan of action against the move.

Share
Categories
2020 census Alexandria ocasio-cortez AOC census Illegal Immigration Intelwars

AOC urges illegal immigrants to complete 2020 census form — and study finds it could have huge implications

Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is urging illegal immigrants to participate in the 2020 census.

During an interview with “Late Night” host Seth Myers, the New York Democrat said that “every single person, no matter your documentation status” should complete the census.

“We’re all going to get census forms— we’re gonna get mailed a prompt to fill out the census in the next two weeks or so,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “And so I think what’s really important is that we all fill this out. It happens once every 10 years.”

“Every single person, no matter your documentation status, no matter your housing status, income, etc., is to be counted,” she explained.

She further explained that data collected in the once-per-decade census is used to determine apportionment of federal funds as well as how many members of Congress each state is allotted, which also has Electoral College implications.

“Your census data is not shared with any other federal agency at all,” she said. “So don’t worry if you’re having a creative living situation, it’s not going to be told to your landlord or anything crazy like that.”


youtu.be

It is true that the Census does not collect data on citizenship. President Donald Trump attempted to re-add the question to the census, but the effort was blocked by the Supreme Court last year.

However, because congressional apportionment is based on census data, illegal immigration can have a drastic effect on power dynamics in Washington. That means states with higher illegal immigrant populations — like California, Texas, and New York — will be positively impacted by continued illegal immigration.

In fact, the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that non-citizens and their U.S. born children, which includes legal immigrants and illegal immigrants, will redistribute 10 congressional seats: California will gain four, Texas will gain three, while New York, Florida, and New Jersey each gain one.

Specifically, CIS estimates that illegal immigrants and their children will be responsible for redistributing five congressional seats: California and Texas each gain two, while New York gains one.

The U.S. Census Bureau will begin distributing census invitations next week.

Share