AstraZeneca Cabal central bankers Companies COVID-19 Headline News human beings injures Intelwars killing LIES long lasting mandatory negative effects New World Order no consequences no liability propaganda Scam severe side effects stand up vaccines wake up willful misconduct

Big Pharma Will Not Be Responsible For COVID-19 Side Effects Caused By Vaccines

This should come as no surprise, but big pharmaceutical companies will not be held responsible for any damages and side effects to people who get a coronavirus vaccine. A senior executive for pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca has confirmed that his company cannot face legal action for any potential side effects caused by its COVID vaccine.

Those who will be affected adversely will have no legal recourse against the company creating the vaccines. They will not be made safe or effective, since they literally don’t have to be.

AstraZeneca is one of 25 pharmaceutical companies worldwide already testing their COVID vaccines on humans, in preparation for injecting hundreds of millions of people. These are flush times for Britain’s largest pharmaceutical company, worth something in the order of £70 million. They have just reported bumper profits of $12.6 billion in the last six months alone.

But despite its healthy balance sheet, AstraZeneca is unwilling to be held responsible for any potential side effects of its ‘hopeful’ vaccine candidate. In other words, the company is completely protected, or indemnified, against lawsuits from people who are injected with their vaccine and experience negative effects, regardless of how severe or long-lasting they are. –RT

While regular everyday people are being fined for not wearing masks, big pharma can literally permanently damage or kill as many people as they want in the name of “national interest” in order to vaccinate everyone. We live in a system that is truly upside down and backward.

Ruud Dobber, a senior AstraZeneca executive, told ReutersIn the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries, it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest.’’ For “national interest,” read “government interest.” Whether what is happening is good for the actual people of vaccinated countries is, to put it very mildly, an open question. A forced global vaccine with unknown contents and side effects will benefit only a few.

The United States has already done their “job” as far as the New World Order cabal of central bankers are concerned.

[The U.S. has] a special legal framework in which no pharmaceutical companies face lawsuits for side effects of vaccines in case of ‘public health emergencies’. This legislation, known as the PREP Act, was the product of a massive lobbying effort from the US pharmaceutical industry, and was introduced despite vigorous opposition from consumer groups. Unless the vaccine maker intentionally murders or injures you – willful misconduct – you cannot sue them. -RT

This message should ring loud and clear to every single human on this planet: vaccine manufacturers want nothin to do with the consequences of their vaccines. But they do need you to line up to take it.


AstraZeneca Coronavirus Coronavirus vaccine COVID-19 Covid-19 vaccine Intelwars Moderna Pfizer

Vaccine developer says people must wear masks and socially distance even after vaccine is available

A vaccine developer at the Baylor College of Medicine told Business Insider that people should not expect an immediate return to normal life once a vaccine is available.

Several companies are working as quickly as possible to develop a safe and effective vaccine, which has been viewed by some as necessary for lockdowns to end and schools to reopen. While a vaccine may significantly reduce the risk of serious disease from the novel coronavirus, social distancing and face masks may still be a part of life, said vaccine developer Maria Elena Bottazzi.

“They automatically are going to say, ‘oh great, I’m just going to get my little vaccine, and I can go back and do exactly the things I was doing last year,'” Bottazzi told Business Insider. “That is absolutely not true.”

Ideally, Bottazzi said, a vaccine would give sterilizing immunity, meaning it would totally prevent people from becoming infected. Many vaccines don’t reach that level of effectiveness, however, and only reduce the chance of developing severe symptoms of a particular disease.

Vaccines improve over time, which means the first version of the COVID-19 vaccine that is made available to the public might not be 100% effective. In fact, Moderna’s vaccine, which is entering phase 3 of trials, is aiming to demonstrate 60% effectiveness.

Moderna CEO Stephanie Bancel said that if the vaccine reaches 90% effectiveness, then people can safely stop wearing masks — unless they have high-risk health conditions, in which case they may need to continue wearing them. Bancel said the company hopes to know more about their vaccine’s efficacy as early as October or as late as December.

For comparison, the 2019-2020 flu vaccine is only about 45% effective against the seasonal flu and typically ranges between 40% and 60% effectiveness every year. A vaccine was never successfully developed for the SARS coronavirus in 2002, and eventually demand for such a vaccine went away, as the virus ran its course and mostly disappeared without spreading nearly as widely as COVID-19 has.

In summary, the masks could be here to stay through the end of 2020, and potentially even longer depending on how successful the COVID-19 vaccines are.

“The moment you get a vaccine doesn’t mean you’re going to put your mask in the trash,” Bottazzi told Business Insider. “That is not going to happen. I hope people don’t think that is going to be the magic solution for all.”