2020 Election 911 Alexandria ocasio-cortez Among us Anti-american Get out the vote Ilhan omar Intelwars Leftists

AOC, Ilhan Omar take part in online event organized by vlogger who last year said ‘America deserved 9/11’

Far-left U.S. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) took part in an online get-out-the-vote event this week organized by Hasan Piker, an activist vlogger who last year said “America deserved 9/11,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.

What are the details?

The congresswomen played the popular video game “Among Us” and livestreamed it with other gamers Tuesday night on Twitch as part of a voting outreach to young people watching on the platform, USA Today said, adding that over 435,000 people viewed the event.

Ocasio-Cortez noted at the beginning of the stream that Piker, one of the gamers, “wrangled” the event together at the last minute, the Free Beacon said.

Last year, Piker — a former former contributor to the left-wing news and commentary group The Young Turks — attacked U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) in a video and said “America deserved 9/11,” the Free Beacon noted. Crenshaw lost his right eye in 2012 while serving in Iraq.

“This guy has the understanding of foreign policy of, like, a 12-year-old,” Piker said of Crenshaw, according to the outlet. “What the f***. What the f*** is wrong with this dude? Didn’t he go to war and like literally lose his eye because some mujahideen — a brave f***ing soldier — f***ed his eye hole with their d***.”

Piker also said, “America deserved 9/11, dude. F*** it, I’m saying it.”

Following backlash, Piker admitted his comments were “inappropriate” and poorly executed satire, the Wrap said.

“I didn’t say Americans deserved 9/11 — I said America deserves 9/11,” Piker added, according to the Wrap.

Even Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks called Piker’s words “incredibly crass” and “wrong,” the outlet noted.

Piker’s response? “Maybe you can chalk it up to English being my second language or whatever you want to chalk it up to,” he said, according to the Wrap.

What else?

Twitch suspended Piker for his comments last year, the Free Beacon said.

More from the outlet:

Ocasio-Cortez was scheduled to participate in an event Tuesday evening to honor the late Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin but pulled out last month after facing pressure from Palestinian activists. She has also refused to meet with multiple Jewish leaders and community activists in New York City.

Omar, of course, is well known for anti-Semitism and last year infamously characterized the events of 9/11 as “some people did something.” Ocasio-Cortez defended Omar as backlash hit due to her 9/11 statement, saying criticisms of Omar were an “incitement of violence against progressive women of color,” the Associated Press said.

911 American Flag Baylor university Conservatives Flag display Intelwars Sensitive content Trigger warning

Baylor University places ‘sensitive content’ warnings at 9/11 flag memorial created by conservative students. Oops.

Seems Baylor University deemed a display of 2,977 mini-U.S. flags — in memory of the victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — a tad much for the campus community to emotionally handle without some kind of trigger warning, so they provided one: “Sensitive content” signs.

What are the details?

Baylor’s chapter of Young Conservatives of Texas put together the display — a tradition that’s been going on at the school for years, Campus Reform reported, citing a news release from the student group.

But this year Baylor Student Activities told YCT it would place “expression activity” signs near the flags, the outlet said, adding that the mandate was handed down fewer than 24 hours before the event.

So YCT demanded an apology.

“We ask that the university formally apologize to the Baylor community for displaying the signs at our memorial in order to assert their commitment to the victims of 9/11,” Campus Reform noted, citing the news release.

And the outlet said the school indeed apologized to YCT as well as the group’s adviser.

What did the school have to say?

“Baylor University fully supports the 9/11 display of American flags depicting the thousands of lives lost as a result of the attacks that took place 19 years ago,” Lori Fogleman, the school’s assistant vice president of media and public relations, told Campus Reform.

She went on to explain to the outlet what went into the “sensitive content” signs: “Out of reverence for the exhibit of flags and in knowing that its moving symbolism could evoke a wide range of emotions, signage was placed near the display notifying those who passed by of its potential impact. This is a standard part of our process regarding outdoor displays which we implemented last year based on feedback from our campus community. We regret that the signage we used has taken away from the intent of the display and apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused.”

Fogleman added to Campus Reform that the university has instituted a new policy — and all temporary on-campus displays “that may evoke an emotional reaction” will be labeled as such.

“In this case, the exhibit’s purpose was to remember the thousands of lives lost in the 9/11 attacks; in essence, it was a temporary memorial to those who died on that tragic day,” she told the outlet. “Our process should have produced a notice informing students, faculty, staff, and visitors of the upcoming 9/11 display and reminding them of its solemn and reverential meaning. Unfortunately, the execution of this process was very poor.”

911 911 ceremony hate groups Intelwars Mayor New Jersey Police thin blue line White Supremacists

Mayor orders cops to remove thin blue line masks for 9/11 ceremony; police union head calls decision ‘disrespectful’

The mayor of a New Jersey city ordered his police officers to remove their thin blue line masks prior to a 9/11 tribute ceremony last week.

What are the details?

Fair Lawn PBA Local 67 said on its Facebook page that Mayor Kurt Peluso “ordered” Police Chief Glen Cauwels to tell participating officers to remove the masks since they are “political.”

“The Thin Blue Line is a tribute to all fallen police officers including those lost on 9-11,” the post added. “To interpret it otherwise would be hollow hearted. This is where we stand.”

Image source: Facebook/Fair Lawn PBA Local 67 screenshot

What did the mayor have to say?

Peluso told WKXW-FM that an Aug. 3 rally that “went in the wrong direction” prompted his decision about the masks.

More from the station:

According to coverage of the Aug. 3 event, Bergen County’s rapid deployment team was called in by police when a planned vigil at the Borough Hall devolved into a shouting match between Black Lives Matters protesters and supporters of law enforcement.

“There were a lot of hate groups here with their flags and banners, which really didn’t replicate what our community is,” Peluso told the station. “There’s some issues some of the residents had with the Blue Lives Matter flag. Our chief, borough attorney, and assistant borough manager at the time had a conversation and decided it was best not to wear them and go in different direction.”

The mayor added to WKXW that he viewed the 9/11 ceremony as a chance for everyone to “rally around the American flag and come together as a community. I mentioned to the chief I’d prefer if they didn’t wear those masks [at the ceremony] so we could stand together as a community.”

Peluso added to the station that “what’s really touching for me about 9/11 is the American flag. It’s something we all really appreciate during that time.”

What did police union heads have to say?

Patrick Colligan, president of the New Jersey State Policemen’s Benevolent Association, told WKXW he disagrees with the mayor’s call.

“The thin blue line is now apparently divisive because a group said it was, and a white supremacy group flew it at a rally some time ago,” Colligan told the station in a text. “It is nothing more than a source of pride within our profession. Mayor Peluso should have done some basic research before he jumped on the misinformation bandwagon. We lost 37 members of the Port Authority police on 9/11.”

Stephen Cannici, president of Fair Lawn’s PBA Local 67, told WKXW that he’s “sure” that officers who had to remove their thin blue line masks “were not happy about it, but they did comply with the order of the police chief.”

Cannici also told the station the mayor’s decision was “disrespectful.”

“We are united behind one flag. The thin blue line flag represents the law enforcement officers who have given their lives protecting the citizens of the country,” Cannici added to WKXW. “For me it’s just a respectful thing of showing honor to people who would give up their lives.”

Anything else?

The mayor added to the station that he has friends who are NYPD officers and that at the 9/11 Ground Zero ceremony, members of the force did not wear thin blue line masks.

“We understand there are some political issues at this time, and this is a day for us all to come together,” Peluso noted to WKXW “I think the NYPD really set the tone, and I think everyone should listen to them when it comes to 9/11.”

Thin blue line flags and masks have become a contentious issue of late:

911 911 saudi Intelwars saudi arabia Saudi arabia 911 Saudi arabia sept 11 Sept 11 saudi sept. 11

US federal judge orders two dozen Saudi officials and royals to testify in 9/11 attacks lawsuit

Two dozen Saudi Arabian officials, including members of the royal family, may have to testify about their knowledge of the events leading up to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. A federal judge ordered 24 current and former Saudi officials to be available for depositions for a lawsuit brought by family members who lost loved ones during the 9/11 attacks.

What are the details?

Federal Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in New York unveiled the ruling on Thursday, the eve of the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks. The judge ordered Saudi officials to testify and reveal what they knew before the terror attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans. Judge Netburn said that Saudi Arabia officials must provide depositions and were not protected by diplomatic immunity.

The judge asked that members of the royal family testify, including Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who was a former intelligence chief in Saudi Arabia and was the kingdom’s ambassador to the United States from 1983 to 2005.

Judge Netburn wants Bandar to testify because of his possible ties with Fahad al-Thumairy, a Saudi consular official based in Los Angeles and the imam of the King Fahd Mosque in Los Angeles.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, al-Thumairy was “reputed to be an Islamic fundamentalist and a strict adherent to orthodox Wahhabi doctrine” and “appears to have associated with a particularly radical faction within the community of local worshippers, and had a network of contacts in other cities in the United States.”

He also reportedly had associations with 9/11 hijackers Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi.

Judge Netburn noted that court documents obtained during the course of discovery “indicates that Prince Bandar likely has firsthand knowledge … [of] the role that al-Thumairy was assigned by the kingdom and the diplomatic cover” provided to him, as reported in Yahoo News.

Judge Netburn also called for Bandar’s longtime chief of staff, Ahmed al-Qattan, to testify. Court documents show that al-Qattan “likely has unique firsthand knowledge of al-Jarrah and al-Thumairy’s relevant pre-9/11 activity and any post-9/11 ratification of their conduct.”

Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was a foreign ministry official within the Saudi Embassy, who oversaw the activities of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs. Until last year, al-Jarrah worked in the Saudi Embassy in Morocco. In May, the FBI accidentally revealed al-Jarrah’s name as the Saudi official suspected of directing “crucial support” to two al-Qaeda hijackers involved in the 9/11 terror attacks.

Saleh bin Abdulaziz, who served as Minister of Islamic Affairs at the time of the attacks and still works for the Saudi government, was also asked to be available for depositions.

Some family members of Sept. 11 victims claim that Saudi officials were complicit with al-Qaeda and its leader Osama bin Laden before the commercial airliner attacks on New York’s World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as well as United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed into a field in Somerset County, Pennsylvania.

Of the 19 hijackers in the Sept. 11 attacks, 15 were Saudi citizens. The families are seeking billions of dollars in damages. The Saudi government has denied involvement in the terrorist attacks.

“This is the most important thing to happen other than JASTA being passed letting us sue Saudi Arabia,” the plaintiffs’ attorney, James Kreindler, said on Friday.

“We now get a chance to move up the totem pole of Saudi officials,” Kreindler stated. “We can begin unraveling the entire plot of Saudi officials working with al-Qaeda commit mass murder. We can start uncovering what they know.”

“We want to do discovery into everything Saudi officials did in the United States,” he said.

Kreindler said he hopes depositions begin “as soon as possible,” preferably starting within “weeks or months, not years.”

“This is a game changer,” said Brett Eagleson, whose father was killed in the attacks on the Twin Towers and is a spokesperson for the families involved in the 9/11 lawsuit. “This is the most significant ruling we’ve had to date in this lawsuit. And to have this on the eve of the anniversary of 9/11, you couldn’t script this any better. The families are elated.”

Michael Kellogg, an attorney for Saudi Arabia, declined to comment on Friday, according to the Washington Post.


Justice Rising on 9/11 Truth – Richard Gage on The Corbett Report – Corbett Report Extras


Richard Gage of joins us to discuss the various actions, inquests, studies, documentaries and conferences that are happening around the 19th anniversary of 9/11.

Richard Gage will be on the WRH radio show Sept. 9th.

911 Intelwars

First Responders Urge 9/11 Investigation — Sept. 11, 2019 Press Conference

Strange how the corporate media ignored this event.

Please make time to watch this.


September 11, 2001: “The Global War on Terrorism” is Fake. Al Qaeda is “Made in America”

The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage war on Afghanistan on “humanitarian grounds”, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the “international community”. Several prominent “progressive” intellectuals made a case for “retaliation against terrorism”, on moral and ethical grounds. The “just cause” military doctrine (jus ad bellum) was accepted and upheld at face value as a legitimate response to 9/11.

In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country in Central Asia of 30 million people.

The myth of the “outside enemy” and the threat of “Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the Bush administration’s military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and constitutional government in America.

Amply documented but rarely mentioned by the mainstream media, Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA going back to the Soviet- Afghan war. This was a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US Congress, which the mainstream media chose to either dismiss or ignore. The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War: “he turned against us”.

The 9/11 Commission Report has largely upheld the “outside enemy” mythology, heralding Al Qaeda as the “mastermind” organization behind the 9/11 attacks.

The official 9/11 narrative has not only distorted the causes underling the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, it has also erased the historical record of US covert support to international terrorism, while creating the illusion that America and “Western Civilization” are threatened.

Without an “outside enemy”, there could be no “war on terrorism”. The entire national security agenda would collapse “like a house of cards”. The war criminals in high office would have no leg to stand on.

After 9/11, the campaign of media disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the historical evidence on how this illusive Al Qaeda “outside enemy” had been fabricated and transformed into “Enemy Number One”.


Appeals court rules due process rights don’t apply to Guantanamo detainees

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that foreign detainees at Guantanamo Bay do not have the right to make due process claims in court.

The decision from the three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Constitution does not apply to those held at the military base.

Judge Neomi Rao, who was appointed to the court by President Trump, wrote in the decision that “the Due Process Clause may not be invoked by aliens without property or presence in the sovereign territory of the United States.”

The decision rejects the appeal of Abdulsalam Ali Abdulrahman al Hela, a Yemeni citizen who has been detained at the U.S. military base in Cuba since 2004. A district judge last year denied al Hela’s habeas corpus petition challenging his detention at the facility.

“We think the decision is incorrect and we’re considering our options,” David Remes, al Hela’s attorney, told The Hill on Friday. “The fundamental injustice at Guantanamo is holding individuals indefinitely without a charge. That’s the ultimate problem that needs to be addressed.”

Friday’s decision would likely be the most categorical denial of legal rights for Guantanamo detainees in nearly two decades of court battles over the military prison


BBC Foreknowledge of 9/11 Collapse of WTC Building Seven: British Man Won Law Suit against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up

This article was first posted on Global Research in March 2015. It is of crucial significance. It proves that the collapse of WTC building seven was a “terrorist act”. Both CNN and the BBC had foreknowledge of the collapse.

A class action law suit against the BBC should be contemplated?

The BBC had foreknowledge of a criminal act and failed to inform the public. ( M. Ch. GR Editor)


COVID-19: Pentagon Secrecy on Virus at Guantanamo Another Reason to Shut Offshore Prison, Democratic Senators Say

Lawmakers raised the case for closure days after the international Red Cross canceled its visit to Guantanamo Bay, citing concerns over the pandemic.

Lawmakers including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ed Markey (D-MA), and Ron Wyden (D-OR) denounced the Department of Defense’s response to their earlier letter, in which they demanded to know specifics regarding the government’s plan to keep Covid-19 from spreading in the facility, where a number of medically vulnerable detainees are being held indefinitely.

In addition to the prison being “inconsistent with our values” and doing nothing to keep Americans safer, the senators said Monday, the Pentagon’s lack of transparency regarding containment and mitigation methods makes it clear that Guantanamo Bay must no longer be used to detain people captured over the last two decades as part of the “War on Terror,” the majority of whom have not been charged with a crime.

911 Canceled Intelwars memorial nyc Tribute in light

NYC’s annual 9/11 ‘Tribute in Light’ memorial canceled over concern workers might get COVID-19

The National September 11 Memorial & Museum announced it will not put on its annual “Tribute in Light” memorial display this year, saying the health risks to the workers who would install the lights would be “far too great” because of COVID-19.

What are the details?

The museum stated on its website:

Tribute in Light, the world’s beloved twin beams of light, will not shine over lower Manhattan as part of this year’s 9/11 commemoration. This incredibly difficult decision was reached in consultation with our partners after concluding the health risks during the pandemic were far too great for the large crew required to produce the annual Tribute in Light. We hope to resume this iconic tribute for the 20th anniversary. In a spirit of unity and remembrance, the city will come together for a “Tribute in Lights” initiative to inspire the world and honor the promise to never forget.

Instead of the massive light beams shining symbolically where the Twin Towers once stood, the museum said “many iconic New York City buildings will be lighting their spires and facades in blue to honor those killed on 9/11.”

Folks on social media expressed outrage over the decision.

Conservative talk show host Larry O’Connor tweeted, “Give me a f*****g break! There was no fear for the workers used to paint a BLM mural at Trump Tower! NYC makes their priorities known. Duly noted.”

Someone else wrote, “So much for ‘never forget,'” while another replied, “It takes about 40 people to set up those lights. I would volunteer without hesitation to do this. I’m sure thousands would. Do not make the sky over Manhattan be dark. We need the light.”

One person pointed out, “NYC schools will be opening in September 9th, 9/11 Light Installation cancelled over COVID 19 fear. Do you see who is the @NYCMayor?”

“Call it a protest,” somebody suggested.

“First, they cancelled the reading of names. Now they can’t even put the lights up in commemoration,” another person tweeted. “This is completely dishonorable and disgraceful. I’m ashamed to be from this city right now.”

According to the New York Post, the museum had already “scrapped the in-person reading of 9/11 victims at the annual Ground Zero ceremony.”

However, the outlet noted, “last week, a nonprofit, The Tunnel to Towers Foundation, announced their own separate Lower Manhattan ceremony where select family members of 9/11 victims will be permitted to read the names of their loved ones.”

911 Black Lives Matter emergencies Intelwars Nevada library Police protests Sheriff daniel coverley

Nevada sheriff tells library: Want to back Black Lives Matter? Go ahead — just don’t call us for help.

The Douglas County Public Library in Nevada wanted to step up and support the local Black Lives Matter movement — but the county sheriff responded by saying officers would not respond to 911 calls to the facility in the event of dangerous protests and rioting.

What are the details?

According to the Washington Post, Douglas County Sheriff Daniel Coverley threatened to stop responding to any 911 calls to the library after the facility drafted a public statement in support of the local Black Lives Matter movement.

In a newly released diversity statement, the library said, “We support #BlackLivesMatter.”

Another portion of the statement added, “We resolutely assert and believe that all forms of racism, hatred, inequality, and injustice don’t belong in our society.”

In response, Coverley issued a statement of his own.

He wrote, “Due to your support of Black Lives Matter and the obvious lack of support or trust with the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, please do not feel the need to call 911 for help. I wish you good luck with disturbances and lewd behavior.”

Coverley also argued that Black Lives Matter-related protests have only caused “violence, property damage, and the closing of local businesses.”

‘Meant to state our inclusivity’

Douglas County Public Library Director Amy Dodson said that the message was intended to convey a message of inclusivity.

“It simply was meant to state our inclusivity at the library, that we are open and welcoming to everyone and we treat everyone equally,” Dodson insisted.

A spokesperson later told the Reno Gazette Journal that despite the sheriff’s bold statement, the department would, indeed continue to respond to emergency calls from the library.

In a later statement, Coverley said his action was in response to the high-stress environment under which police across the country are forced to operate.

“This has been a difficult time to be a law enforcement professional and can be disheartening when we perceive that our office may be under attack,” he said Tuesday. “My response was rooted in my belief that these issues need to be openly discussed in a way that values diversity and law enforcement.”

A joint statement of unity

According to the Post, Dodson and Coverley met, discussed the situation, and released a joint statement.

“Sheriff Coverley and I had a very candid conversation,” Dodson said in a statement approved by the sheriff. “We agreed that we both support the people of Douglas County and this may have been an unfortunate circumstance of misunderstanding.

“The library respects and supports the work of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office and appreciates everything they do to keep our community safe,” the statement concluded.

911 Intelwars Ohio Police Snitches Social distancing enforcement Toledo

Toledo police: Callers are ‘tying up’ 911 lines to snitch on social distancing violators. Reaction is pure annoyance.

Police in Toledo, Ohio, said Tuesday on Twitter that callers are “tying up” 911 lines to snitch on social distancing violators — and those reacting to the news are more than a little annoyed.

After police gave the health department’s number that people can call instead to report “people not social distancing at bars and restaurants,” Twitter commenters were collectively annoyed at those who were calling 911:

  • “Please don’t waste my tax dollars calling the police, Karen. Just stay inside your home in fear, clutching your pearls, while you watch MSNBC & CNN triggering you into an early grave; k thx.”
  • “Grow up America.”
  • “POLICE STATE!! Who do you call if you have ‘concerns’ about the people calling?? WTH.”
  • “It’s called the snitch line. All liberals that want to maintain authoritarian rule over the people call this number.”
  • “Act like adults people. It’s real simple.”
  • “Land of the free….. Lol.”
  • “You guys are literally making it harder for police by trying to enforce UNLAWFUL orders!”
  • “Disgusting how people are bowing down to all these tyrannical orders.”
911 FBI Intelwars saudi arabia September 11 Terrorism

FBI mistakenly reveals name of Saudi official suspected of directing ‘crucial support’ to 9/11 attackers

The Federal Bureau of Investigation accidentally revealed the name of a Saudi official suspected of directing “crucial support” to two al-Qaeda hijackers involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, according to a report from Yahoo News.

The name of the mid-level Saudi foreign ministry official was mistakenly released last week in a declaration by an FBI official in response to a lawsuit by families of 9/11 victims who accuse Saudi Arabia’s government of involvement in the terrorist attacks.

Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah was accidentally named in the declaration, which was incorrectly filed to a public docket. Al-Jarrah was a diplomat assigned to the Saudi embassy in Washington, D.C., between 1999 and 2000. “His duties apparently included overseeing the activities of Ministry of Islamic Affairs employees at Saudi-funded mosques and Islamic centers within the United States,” the report said.

The FBI didn’t redact al-Jarrah’s name in a document. The Department of Justice removed the document that was previously made public on accident. Michael Isikoff, the chief investigative journalist at Yahoo News who noticed the error, said a senior US government official confirmed the mistake.

The 9/11 families have been fighting for the identification of the Saudi official who allegedly had involvement in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks at the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, as well as in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon.

For years, the families have been asking for the identity of the Saudi diplomat who reportedly worked with two other Saudi nationals to assist and direct the hijackers.

Last September, on the anniversary of the terror attack, the Trump administration agreed to declassify the name of the diplomat, but did not release it publicly. The lawyers could be told the name under protective seal, but they could not discuss it publicly, according to NBC News.

Evidence that the FBI gathered about al-Jarrah and his communications about the two attackers remain under seal.

Two sources close to the case told NBC News that the “FBI and the Justice Department are asserting that since it was an erroneous disclosure, the name is still subject to a protective order and neither side is allowed to discuss it publicly.”

The families of the victims are suing Saudi Arabia for the deaths and damages from the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Of the 19 hijackers, 15 were Saudi citizens, as was 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. Two of the hijackers may have obtained their passports “legitimately or illegitimately” with the help of a family member who worked in a Saudi passport office.

The Saudi government has denied any involvement in the attacks. The 9/11 Commission “found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization.”

911 Americans with coronavirus COVID-19 Intelwars Joe Scarborough Morning Joe MSNBC WWII

Joe Scarborough: the atmosphere inside the White House is ‘very sober,’ and COVID-19 is ‘going to change the way Americans live’

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough says that the COVID-19 outbreak is more like World War II rather than like 9/11.

Speaking with presidential historian Jon Meacham, Scarborough said that the U.S. was facing a challenge comparable to WWII.

What are the details?

The “Morning Joe” co-host said that the weekend’s “sobering report” that estimated the death of at least 2 million Americans from the COVID-19 spread puts the country on par with WWII rather than the events that unfolded on Sept. 11, 2001.

“[That’s] more Americans than died in World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Civil War combined. It is a staggering number,” he said.

“The same thing happened in Great Britain, where they reversed course after finding out their models yesterday would lead to 250,000 British citizens dying,” he continued. “The White House is unusually focused and frightened about what is coming.”

Scarborough, who said he spoke to “high-ranking officials” this week, insisted that he received information that “this is going to be very bad.”

“We are going to have to, you know — it is all hands on deck,” he added. “This isn’t like 9/11. This is like World War II. It is going to change the way we live as Americans. And the atmosphere inside the White House was very sober.”

Scarborough pointed out that even President Donald Trump seems to be feeling the ominous atmosphere judging by his suggestions.

“As I hear the president yesterday talking about voluntary measures, and then suggesting they may have to lock down so-called hot spots, I was thinking, ‘That’s actually the best way to go at first,'” he admitted. “Because we Americans might not respond as well, certainly not as well as, let’s say, people in China, people in Singapore, to federal government locking things down. It is going region by region, state by state, locality by locality.”

What else?

Meacham added that he believes it feels more like “England and Britain during World War II.”

“The analogy I keep thinking of is less about America during World War II, because though we mobilized, we did it very late,” he explained. “Obviously, after Pearl Harbor and Germany declared war on us, 16 million Americans served, 11 percent of the male population, 2 million in Europe. There were victory gardens, and there was a full mobilization.”

He continued, “I think this is more like England and Britain during World War II. Civilians are actually combatants, if you will, if you followed the analogy. Everybody was at the front, right? Churchill said in the great ‘finest hour’ speech, you know, let us so conduct ourselves that if the British empire were to last 1,000 years, men will still say, this was their finest hour.”

He concluded, “[Churchill] needed everybody because Germany was dropping bombs on everybody. Where we’re living right now, the Luftwaffe is overhead in the form of a pandemic. It requires, dare I say it, Churchill-like leadership.”

03 17 2020 06 10 55


Lawyers for survivors of 9/11 victims accuse Saudi authorities of targeting witnesses: Legal team also reveals that murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi was ‘potential witness’ in lawsuit

A legal team representing survivors and familes of victims of the 9/11 attacks has accused Saudi authorities of trying to silence several witnesses.

An almost two-decades-old lawsuit brought to court by thousands of victims and their families accuses Saudi officials of having ties to the 11 September 2001 attacks on New York and Washington. About 3,000 people were killed.

On Wednesday, lawyers representing the families said that four of their witnesses in the case had been threatened or intimidated by alleged Saudi agents.

On those grounds, the plaintiffs’ legal team requested that the identities of the witnesses in the drawn-out legal battle be protected and kept secret.

Lawyers representing the Saudi government denied the allegations of witness tampering, saying the claims were “based on hearsay within hearsay”.

The defense also accused the plaintiffs’ lawyers of trying to gain a “tactical advantage” in legal deposition interviews with witnesses set to be organised later this month.

Jamal Khashoggi: ‘A potential witness’

The lawyers of the 9/11 victims invoked the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi officials in Turkey as evidence of the kingdom’s potential threat against their witnesses.

Andrew Maloney, one of several attorneys representing the plaintiffs, also for the first time revealed that Khashoggi, an ardent critic of the Saudi government, had been “a potential witness” before he was murdered.

“He had valuable information,” Maloney told the judge on Wednesday.

Maloney, during the emergency hearing that took place at a federal court in lower Manhattan, did not provide further details regarding what that information might have been.

911 Intelwars

Lawyers for survivors of 9/11 victims accuse Saudi authorities of targeting witnesses

A legal team representing survivors and familes of victims of the 9/11 attacks has accused Saudi authorities of trying to silence several witnesses.

An almost two-decades-old lawsuit brought to court by thousands of victims and their families accuses Saudi officials of having ties to the 11 September 2001 attacks on New York and Washington. About 3,000 people were killed.

On Wednesday, lawyers representing the families said that four of their witnesses in the case had been threatened or intimidated by alleged Saudi agents.

On those grounds, the plaintiffs’ legal team requested that the identities of the witnesses in the drawn-out legal battle be protected and kept secret.


How the ‘Interpreter’ Scam Brought 75,000 Iraqis and Afghans to America

One fact about all empires. The Homeland becomes over run by foreigners. Happens to every empire and helps to destroy it.

The latest battle over Special Immigrant Visas pitted Stephen Miller, President Trump’s senior advisor, against the Pentagon. The military brass was lobbying for 6,000 special immigrant visas for Iraqis who worked for American forces in the country. These visas were once again billed as helping “interpreters”.

That’s a lot of interpreters considering that there were only 5,200 American troops in Iraq.

How could there be more Iraqi interpreters for American troops than there are troops?


Rove’s Reality

How could Rove’s predictions so totally materialize? There’s a simple answer: ‘they’ got away with momentous lies at an early stage. The more authorities lie successfully the more they are likely to lie again in a big way to serve the purposes of earlier lies. The ‘they’ stands for those individuals and groups in the power system who operate beyond legal limits as a hydra-headed entity, whose coordination depends on the project, campaign, mission, or operation at hand. Those with much power got away with excessive extralegal use of it since the beginning of this century because systems of holding the powerful to account have crumbled on both sides of the Atlantic. Hence, potential opposition to what the reality architects were doing dwindled to almost nothing. At the same time, people whose job or personal inclination leads them to ferret out truth were made to feel guilty for pursuing it.
The best way, I think, to make sense of how this works is to study it as a type of intimidation. Sticking to the official story because you have to may not be quite as bad as forced religious conversion with a gun pointed at your head, but it belongs to the same category. It begins with the triggering of odd feelings of guilt. At least that is how I remember it. Living in Tokyo, I had just read Mark Lane’s Rush To Judgment, the first major demolishing in book form of the Warren Report on the murder of John F. Kennedy, when I became aware that I had begun to belong to an undesirable category of people who were taking the existence of conspiracies seriously. We all owe thanks to writers of Internet-based samizdat literature who’ve recently reminded us that the pejorative use of the conspiracy label stems from one of the greatest misinformation successes of the CIA begun in 1967.


Chuck Baldwin – This is ZOG (Zionist Occupational Gov’t.)

While US troops are fighting Israel’s wars abroad, the homeland has been conquered not by arms, but by money. How should Americans respond to being subjugated?

by Chuck Baldwin
(Abridged by
. The entire political debate in America centers on the left-right paradigm. If you are a Republican, Democrats are the enemy; if you are a Democrat, Republicans are the enemy. The entire political world revolves around this notion.

It’s all a game, a façade, a hoax.

Here’s how it works: When the ruling class wants to focus on building a socialist Welfare state, dismantling traditional cultural and religious norms and enacting gun control, it puts liberal Democrats in power. And when it wants to focus on building the Warfare State and creating foreign enemies for the purpose of expanding the “war on terror” and a global surveillance state, it puts conservative Republicans in charge.


Trump Issues Pardon for Ex-NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik

As with so many “news media” reports now it’s what is NOT REPORTED that is the real news. The following is a case in point. Whether intentional or not, key elements are missing in the NBC report and they constitute the pivotal point in the following story.

Comment – JuneBug1415 on Reddit
Bernard Kerik accepted a “loan” of $250k from Israel billionaire when meeting with Israel to discuss counter-terrorism 2 weeks before 9/11. And oh yea, he was the police commissioner that oversaw 9/11, was pardoned today.
Today Trump has granted clemency or pardoned 11 people all convicted of corruption. But the one that bothers me the most is Kerik.
He accepted a $250,000 interest-free “loan” from Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer and failed to report it. Kerik first met the billionaire, whose vast holdings include major defense contractors, when Kerik took a four-day trip to Israel less than two weeks before September 11, 2001 to discuss counter-terrorism with Israeli officials.

36-year-old 911 911 call arrest Arrested cell phone Cell phone plan Dispatch Disrupting public service Intelwars Ohio parents Shut of cell phone

Cops arrest woman who repeatedly called 911 complaining that her parents canceled her cellphone plan. She’s 36 years old.

Police arrested a 36-year-old Ohio woman last week after she would not stop calling 911 to tell police that her parents had canceled her cellphone plan, WEWS-TV reported.

On Feb. 13, Seloni Khetarpal of Canton, Ohio, “repeatedly” called police demanding that officers respond to the situation by coming to her home, court documents say.

During the first call, police reportedly warned her that the regional emergency dispatch should be dialed only in the case of an actual emergency requiring police assistance — but she didn’t listen. Hours later, Khetarpal called again insisting that the police do something.

According to court documents, she was belligerent” and insisted that her parents canceling her phone plan was a legitimate issue.

Later that evening, officers did finally come to her house but not for the reason she had hoped. She was arrested for disrupting public service, which is a fourth-degree felony. Khetarpal is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on Feb. 27.

The reason her parents canceled her cellphone plan has not been reported.

Anything else?

WOIO-TV obtained audio of the second call, where you can hear Khetarpal and a dispatch worker arguing over the legitimacy of the call.


9/11 – THE FOOTAGE THEY DIDN’T LET YOU SEE TWICE (9/11 2001 Documentary)

Show this short mini-documentary to anyone who has not seen at least 5 9/11 documentaries.

The events of 9/11, 2001. Rare Video footage that was not repeated on the news, or used by CNN ever wondered why?

911 Censorship Intelwars Internet Videos

Internet Censorship on 9/11 Free Fall

Host Andy Steele is joined by James Corbett of The Corbett Report to discuss the steps that YouTube has taken in recent years to diminish the presence of alternative information and voices on its platform. (Recorded December 2019)